DeepSeek V3.2 vs Gemma 4
DeepSeek · China | Google · US · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick DeepSeek V3.2 for long-context efficiency via deepseek sparse attention (dsa) or agentic tool-use with thinking integrated into tool calls (thinking/non-thinking modes). Pick Gemma 4 for self-hosted, data-private deployment or running locally or on edge devices. On a tight budget at scale, Gemma 4 is the value pick.
DeepSeek V3.2 (DeepSeek, China) and Gemma 4 (Google, US) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. DeepSeek V3.2 is a cost-efficient, open-weight (MIT) 685B-parameter MoE model whose DeepSeek Sparse Attention delivers GPT-5-comparable reasoning with far cheaper long-context inference. Gemma 4 is google's open-weight family: Apache 2.0 licensed, multimodal, and sized from edge devices up, for private self-hosting. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
- ▸Context window: Gemma 4 holds 2× more — 256K (~384 pages) vs 131K (~197 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
- ▸Recency: Gemma 4 is the newer model by about 4 months (released April 2, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
- ▸Ecosystem: this is a China-vs-US matchup — they differ in pricing philosophy, data-residency options, and tooling ecosystems, not only benchmarks.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | DeepSeek V3.2 | Gemma 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek (China) | Google (US) |
| Released | December 1, 2025 | April 2, 2026 |
| Context window | 131K (~197 pages) | 256K (~384 pages) |
| Price (in/out) | $0.28/$0.42 per 1M tokens | Open weight (self-host / free) |
| Open weight? | Yes — self-hostable | Yes — self-hostable |
| Modalities | text, code | text, image, code |
| SWE-Bench Verified | 73.1% | Not published |
| MRCR v2 @ 1M | Not published | Not published |
Who wins what
Long-context efficiency via DeepSeek Sparse Attention (DSA)
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2 lists long-context efficiency via DeepSeek Sparse Attention (DSA) among its strengths; Gemma 4 does not.
Agentic tool-use with thinking integrated into tool calls (thinking/non-thinking modes)
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2 lists agentic tool-use with thinking integrated into tool calls (thinking/non-thinking modes) among its strengths; Gemma 4 does not.
Elite competition math and reasoning (AIME 2025 93.1, Codeforces 2386)
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2 lists elite competition math and reasoning (AIME 2025 93.1, Codeforces 2386) among its strengths; Gemma 4 does not.
Self-hosted, data-private deployment
Gemma 4
Google's open-weight family: Apache 2.0 licensed, multimodal, and sized from edge devices up, for private self-hosting — and it carries the larger 256K context.
Running locally or on edge devices
Gemma 4
Google's open-weight family: Apache 2.0 licensed, multimodal, and sized from edge devices up, for private self-hosting — and it is the newer of the two.
Fine-tuning on your own data
Gemma 4
Gemma 4 lists fine-tuning on your own data among its strengths; DeepSeek V3.2 does not.
Lowest cost at scale
Gemma 4
Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of DeepSeek V3.2's $0.28/$0.42 per 1M tokens.
Largest single-prompt input
Gemma 4
Its 256K window is about 2× larger than DeepSeek V3.2's 131K, fitting roughly 384 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ Gemma 4
At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts DeepSeek V3.2, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ Gemma 4
Larger 256K window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is long-context efficiency via deepseek sparse attention (dsa)
→ DeepSeek V3.2
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is self-hosted, data-private deployment
→ Gemma 4
That is its strongest area.
An enterprise with regional data-residency rules
→ Gemma 4 or DeepSeek V3.2
Origin (China vs US) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.
DeepSeek V3.2: where it fits
A cost-efficient, open-weight (MIT) 685B-parameter MoE model whose DeepSeek Sparse Attention delivers GPT-5-comparable reasoning with far cheaper long-context inference. Released December 1, 2025 by DeepSeek, it is built for long-context efficiency via DeepSeek Sparse Attention (DSA), agentic tool-use with thinking integrated into tool calls (thinking/non-thinking modes), elite competition math and reasoning (AIME 2025 93.1, Codeforces 2386), and low-cost, open-weight (MIT) self-hosting.
Its trade-offs are real: superseded - no longer listed on DeepSeek's current pricing page as of August 2026; DeepSeek V4-Flash/V4-Pro are the current models, text-only — no image, audio, or video input, and sWE-Bench Verified (73.1) trails the top closed coding models (Claude 4.5 Sonnet 77.2, Gemini 3 Pro 76.2). At $0.28 in / $0.42 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
Gemma 4: where it fits
Google's open-weight family: Apache 2.0 licensed, multimodal, and sized from edge devices up, for private self-hosting. Released April 2, 2026 by Google, it is built for self-hosted, data-private deployment, running locally or on edge devices, fine-tuning on your own data, and multimodal tasks over a 256K context.
Its trade-offs: trails frontier closed models on the hardest tasks, and needs your own hardware to run. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.
The bottom line for this matchup
This is less "which is smarter" and more "which ecosystem fits." DeepSeek V3.2 (China) and Gemma 4 (US) differ on pricing philosophy, data-residency, and tooling as much as on raw scores. Gemma 4 is the cheaper option, which matters at volume. The pragmatic move is to run one real task through both and judge the outputs against your own constraints — including where your data is allowed to be processed.
Want both DeepSeek V3.2 and Gemma 4 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
See pricingFrequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek V3.2 or Gemma 4 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for Gemma 4, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, DeepSeek V3.2 leans toward long-context efficiency via deepseek sparse attention (dsa) while Gemma 4 leans toward self-hosted, data-private deployment, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or Gemma 4?
Gemma 4 is cheaper — $0.28/$0.42 per 1M tokens vs Open weight (self-host / free).
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 4 — 256K vs 131K, about 2× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both DeepSeek V3.2 and Gemma 4 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you DeepSeek V3.2, Gemma 4 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, DeepSeek V3.2 or Gemma 4?
Gemma 4 — released April 2, 2026, about 4 months after DeepSeek V3.2.
Related comparisons
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.