MiMo-V2.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
Xiaomi · China | Nanbeige LLM Lab (BOSS Zhipin) · China · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5 for native omnimodal — strong image and video understanding or very low cost (~half the inference of the pro tier). Pick Nanbeige4.3-33B for 33b dense open-weight model under apache 2.0 with a 524,288-token context or artificial analysis intelligence index of 20, first of the 8 models in its comparison class. On a tight budget at scale, Nanbeige4.3-33B is the value pick.
MiMo-V2.5 (Xiaomi) and Nanbeige4.3-33B (Nanbeige LLM Lab (BOSS Zhipin)) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. MiMo-V2.5 is xiaomi's cheap omnimodal model — Pro-level agentic perception across image and video at a fraction of the cost. Nanbeige4.3-33B is nanbeige LLM Lab's October 25, 2026 Apache 2.0 open model - 33B parameters and 512K context, aimed at agentic coding on modest hardware. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
- ▸Context window: MiMo-V2.5 holds 1.9× more — 1M (~1,500 pages) vs 512K tokens (~786 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
- ▸Recency: Nanbeige4.3-33B is the newer model by about 6 months (released October 25, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | MiMo-V2.5 | Nanbeige4.3-33B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi (China) | Nanbeige LLM Lab (BOSS Zhipin) (China) |
| Released | April 22, 2026 | October 25, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M (~1,500 pages) | 512K tokens (~786 pages) |
| Price (in/out) | $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens | Open weight (self-host / free) |
| Open weight? | Yes — self-hostable | Yes — self-hostable |
| Modalities | text, image, audio, video, code | text, code |
| SWE-Bench Verified | Not published | Not published |
| MRCR v2 @ 1M | Not published | Not published |
Who wins what
Native omnimodal — strong image and video understanding
MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi's cheap omnimodal model — Pro-level agentic perception across image and video at a fraction of the cost — and it carries the larger 1M context.
Very low cost (~half the inference of the Pro tier)
MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 lists very low cost (~half the inference of the Pro tier) among its strengths; Nanbeige4.3-33B does not.
Agent-framework integration
MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 lists agent-framework integration among its strengths; Nanbeige4.3-33B does not.
33B dense open-weight model under Apache 2.0 with a 524,288-token context
Nanbeige4.3-33B
Nanbeige LLM Lab's October 25, 2026 Apache 2.0 open model - 33B parameters and 512K context, aimed at agentic coding on modest hardware — and it is the newer of the two.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index of 20, first of the 8 models in its comparison class
Nanbeige4.3-33B
Nanbeige4.3-33B lists artificial Analysis Intelligence Index of 20, first of the 8 models in its comparison class among its strengths; MiMo-V2.5 does not.
Lab-reported Terminal-Bench 2.1 of 80.9 and DeepSWE of 65.5
Nanbeige4.3-33B
Nanbeige4.3-33B lists lab-reported Terminal-Bench 2.1 of 80.9 and DeepSWE of 65.5 among its strengths; MiMo-V2.5 does not.
Lowest cost at scale
Nanbeige4.3-33B
Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of MiMo-V2.5's $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.
Largest single-prompt input
MiMo-V2.5
Its 1M window is about 1.9× larger than Nanbeige4.3-33B's 512K tokens, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ Nanbeige4.3-33B
At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts MiMo-V2.5, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ MiMo-V2.5
Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is native omnimodal — strong image and video understanding
→ MiMo-V2.5
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is 33b dense open-weight model under apache 2.0 with a 524,288-token context
→ Nanbeige4.3-33B
That is its strongest area.
MiMo-V2.5: where it fits
Xiaomi's cheap omnimodal model — Pro-level agentic perception across image and video at a fraction of the cost. Released April 22, 2026 by Xiaomi, it is built for native omnimodal — strong image and video understanding, very low cost (~half the inference of the Pro tier), agent-framework integration, and 1M context for full documents in one pass.
Its trade-offs are real: not the deepest reasoning tier (see V2.5-Pro), and limited Western tooling and support. At $0.14 in / $0.28 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
Nanbeige4.3-33B: where it fits
Nanbeige LLM Lab's October 25, 2026 Apache 2.0 open model - 33B parameters and 512K context, aimed at agentic coding on modest hardware. Released October 25, 2026 by Nanbeige LLM Lab (BOSS Zhipin), it is built for 33B dense open-weight model under Apache 2.0 with a 524,288-token context, artificial Analysis Intelligence Index of 20, first of the 8 models in its comparison class, and lab-reported Terminal-Bench 2.1 of 80.9 and DeepSWE of 65.5.
Its trade-offs: coding benchmarks are self-reported, with non-standard settings noted on the model card and no independent reproduction, no public first-party API or per-token price; Artificial Analysis lists no publicly available API, and text-only input. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.
The bottom line for this matchup
MiMo-V2.5 and Nanbeige4.3-33B overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. Nanbeige4.3-33B costs less per token; MiMo-V2.5 holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — MiMo-V2.5 for native omnimodal — strong image and video understanding, Nanbeige4.3-33B for 33b dense open-weight model under apache 2.0 with a 524,288-token context. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Want both MiMo-V2.5 and Nanbeige4.3-33B without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
See pricingFrequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5 or Nanbeige4.3-33B better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, MiMo-V2.5 leans toward native omnimodal — strong image and video understanding while Nanbeige4.3-33B leans toward 33b dense open-weight model under apache 2.0 with a 524,288-token context, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or Nanbeige4.3-33B?
Nanbeige4.3-33B is cheaper — $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens vs Open weight (self-host / free).
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5 — 1M vs 512K tokens, about 1.9× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both MiMo-V2.5 and Nanbeige4.3-33B together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you MiMo-V2.5, Nanbeige4.3-33B and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, MiMo-V2.5 or Nanbeige4.3-33B?
Nanbeige4.3-33B — released October 25, 2026, about 6 months after MiMo-V2.5.
Related comparisons
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.