LFM3-1.7B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
Liquid AI · US | NVIDIA · US · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick LFM3-1.7B for very small open-weight text model - about 1.73b parameters with a 256k-token context for on-device use or liquid says it can power agentic applications that used to need 9b parameters. Pick NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra for the most capable open-weight model from a us lab (artificial analysis intelligence index of about 48) or fast, efficient long-horizon agentic reasoning via a hybrid mamba-transformer design.
LFM3-1.7B (Liquid AI) and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra (NVIDIA) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. LFM3-1.7B is liquid AI's October 27, 2026 on-device text model - about 1.73B parameters and 256K context, with open weights under a license capped at $10M annual revenue. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is nVIDIA's open-weight reasoning flagship (about 550B total, 55B active) — the most capable open model from a US lab, built for long-running agents. Their biggest split is context window, and the breakdown below shows exactly how that plays out for your workload.
Key differences at a glance
- ▸Context window: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra holds 3.9× more — 1M (~1,500 pages) vs 256K tokens (~384 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
- ▸Recency: LFM3-1.7B is the newer model by about 5 months (released October 27, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | LFM3-1.7B | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Liquid AI (US) | NVIDIA (US) |
| Released | October 27, 2026 | June 4, 2026 |
| Context window | 256K tokens (~384 pages) | 1M (~1,500 pages) |
| Price (in/out) | Open weight (self-host / free) | Open weight (self-host / free) |
| Open weight? | Yes — self-hostable | Yes — self-hostable |
| Modalities | text | text, code |
| SWE-Bench Verified | Not published | Not published |
| MRCR v2 @ 1M | Not published | Not published |
Who wins what
Very small open-weight text model - about 1.73B parameters with a 256K-token context for on-device use
LFM3-1.7B
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is comparatively weak here — trails the best Chinese open models on overall intelligence
Liquid says it can power agentic applications that used to need 9B parameters
LFM3-1.7B
Liquid AI's October 27, 2026 on-device text model - about 1.73B parameters and 256K context, with open weights under a license capped at $10M annual revenue — and it is the newer of the two.
Part of a six-model LFM3 family covering text, vision, audio, omni and decision tasks
LFM3-1.7B
LFM3-1.7B lists part of a six-model LFM3 family covering text, vision, audio, omni and decision tasks among its strengths; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra does not.
The most capable open-weight model from a US lab (Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index of about 48)
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
NVIDIA's open-weight reasoning flagship (about 550B total, 55B active) — the most capable open model from a US lab, built for long-running agents — and it carries the larger 1M context.
Fast, efficient long-horizon agentic reasoning via a hybrid Mamba-Transformer design
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
Its 1M window holds about 3.9× more than LFM3-1.7B's 256K tokens in a single prompt.
A fully open release — weights, training data, and recipes under a permissive license
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
LFM3-1.7B is comparatively weak here — lFM Open License v1.0 covers commercial use only below $10M annual revenue; larger firms need a paid license
Largest single-prompt input
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
Its 1M window is about 3.9× larger than LFM3-1.7B's 256K tokens, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is very small open-weight text model - about 1.73b parameters with a 256k-token context for on-device use
→ LFM3-1.7B
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is the most capable open-weight model from a us lab (artificial analysis intelligence index of about 48)
→ NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
That is its strongest area.
LFM3-1.7B: where it fits
Liquid AI's October 27, 2026 on-device text model - about 1.73B parameters and 256K context, with open weights under a license capped at $10M annual revenue. Released October 27, 2026 by Liquid AI, it is built for very small open-weight text model - about 1.73B parameters with a 256K-token context for on-device use, liquid says it can power agentic applications that used to need 9B parameters, part of a six-model LFM3 family covering text, vision, audio, omni and decision tasks, and supports 16 languages.
Its trade-offs are real: lFM Open License v1.0 covers commercial use only below $10M annual revenue; larger firms need a paid license, liquid says it is not recommended for agentic coding or complex multi-step reasoning because of its size, text-only; vision and audio need other LFM3 checkpoints, and no published per-token API price found. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra: where it fits
NVIDIA's open-weight reasoning flagship (about 550B total, 55B active) — the most capable open model from a US lab, built for long-running agents. Released June 4, 2026 by NVIDIA, it is built for the most capable open-weight model from a US lab (Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index of about 48), fast, efficient long-horizon agentic reasoning via a hybrid Mamba-Transformer design, a fully open release — weights, training data, and recipes under a permissive license, and strong coding for an open model (SWE-Bench Verified in the high 60s).
Its trade-offs: trails the best Chinese open models on overall intelligence, and a 550B mixture-of-experts is heavy to self-host, and the 1M context is rarely served in full. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.
The bottom line for this matchup
LFM3-1.7B and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — LFM3-1.7B for very small open-weight text model - about 1.73b parameters with a 256k-token context for on-device use, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra for the most capable open-weight model from a us lab (artificial analysis intelligence index of about 48). Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Want both LFM3-1.7B and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
See pricingFrequently asked questions
Is LFM3-1.7B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, LFM3-1.7B leans toward very small open-weight text model - about 1.73b parameters with a 256k-token context for on-device use while NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra leans toward the most capable open-weight model from a us lab (artificial analysis intelligence index of about 48), and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, LFM3-1.7B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra?
They are priced almost identically, so cost will not decide between them.
Which has the bigger context window?
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra — 1M vs 256K tokens, about 3.9× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both LFM3-1.7B and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you LFM3-1.7B, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, LFM3-1.7B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra?
LFM3-1.7B — released October 27, 2026, about 5 months after NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra.
Related comparisons
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.