Inkling vs LFM3-1.7B

Thinking Machines Lab · US  |  Liquid AI · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Inkling for the first model release from mira murati's thinking machines lab (ex-openai cto) - one of the most closely-watched new labs in ai or a 975b-parameter moe (41b active) with native text, image, and audio reasoning in one model. Pick LFM3-1.7B for very small open-weight text model - about 1.73b parameters with a 256k-token context for on-device use or liquid says it can power agentic applications that used to need 9b parameters.

Inkling (Thinking Machines Lab) and LFM3-1.7B (Liquid AI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Inkling is mira Murati's Thinking Machines Lab debuts with Inkling - a 975B open-weight MoE with native multimodal reasoning and a dialable thinking-effort control. LFM3-1.7B is liquid AI's October 27, 2026 on-device text model - about 1.73B parameters and 256K context, with open weights under a license capped at $10M annual revenue. Their biggest split is context window, and the breakdown below shows exactly how that plays out for your workload.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecInklingLFM3-1.7B
ProviderThinking Machines Lab (US) Liquid AI (US)
ReleasedJuly 15, 2026 October 27, 2026
Context window1M (~1,500 pages) 256K tokens (~384 pages)
Price (in/out)Open weight (self-host / free) Open weight (self-host / free)
Open weight?Yes — self-hostable Yes — self-hostable
Modalitiestext, image, audio, code text
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

The first model release from Mira Murati's Thinking Machines Lab (ex-OpenAI CTO) - one of the most closely-watched new labs in AI

Inkling

Mira Murati's Thinking Machines Lab debuts with Inkling - a 975B open-weight MoE with native multimodal reasoning and a dialable thinking-effort control — and it carries the larger 1M context.

A 975B-parameter MoE (41B active) with native text, image, and audio reasoning in one model

Inkling

LFM3-1.7B is comparatively weak here — liquid says it is not recommended for agentic coding or complex multi-step reasoning because of its size

A dialable 'thinking effort' knob (0.2-0.99) that lets you trade speed for depth of reasoning per-request

Inkling

Inkling lists a dialable 'thinking effort' knob (0.2-0.99) that lets you trade speed for depth of reasoning per-request among its strengths; LFM3-1.7B does not.

Very small open-weight text model - about 1.73B parameters with a 256K-token context for on-device use

LFM3-1.7B

Liquid AI's October 27, 2026 on-device text model - about 1.73B parameters and 256K context, with open weights under a license capped at $10M annual revenue — and it is the newer of the two.

Liquid says it can power agentic applications that used to need 9B parameters

LFM3-1.7B

LFM3-1.7B lists liquid says it can power agentic applications that used to need 9B parameters among its strengths; Inkling does not.

Part of a six-model LFM3 family covering text, vision, audio, omni and decision tasks

LFM3-1.7B

LFM3-1.7B lists part of a six-model LFM3 family covering text, vision, audio, omni and decision tasks among its strengths; Inkling does not.

Largest single-prompt input

Inkling

Its 1M window is about 3.9× larger than LFM3-1.7B's 256K tokens, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.

Which should you pick?

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

→ Inkling

Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.

Anyone whose priority is the first model release from mira murati's thinking machines lab (ex-openai cto) - one of the most closely-watched new labs in ai

→ Inkling

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is very small open-weight text model - about 1.73b parameters with a 256k-token context for on-device use

→ LFM3-1.7B

That is its strongest area.

Inkling: where it fits

Mira Murati's Thinking Machines Lab debuts with Inkling - a 975B open-weight MoE with native multimodal reasoning and a dialable thinking-effort control. Released July 15, 2026 by Thinking Machines Lab, it is built for the first model release from Mira Murati's Thinking Machines Lab (ex-OpenAI CTO) - one of the most closely-watched new labs in AI, a 975B-parameter MoE (41B active) with native text, image, and audio reasoning in one model, a dialable 'thinking effort' knob (0.2-0.99) that lets you trade speed for depth of reasoning per-request, and fully open weights (Apache 2.0) at frontier scale - unusual for a model this large and this new.

Its trade-offs are real: a brand-new lab's first release - no multi-generation track record yet, no official hosted API price - available via third-party hosts only at launch, and independent third-party benchmark verification is still limited given how recently it shipped. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.

LFM3-1.7B: where it fits

Liquid AI's October 27, 2026 on-device text model - about 1.73B parameters and 256K context, with open weights under a license capped at $10M annual revenue. Released October 27, 2026 by Liquid AI, it is built for very small open-weight text model - about 1.73B parameters with a 256K-token context for on-device use, liquid says it can power agentic applications that used to need 9B parameters, part of a six-model LFM3 family covering text, vision, audio, omni and decision tasks, and supports 16 languages.

Its trade-offs: lFM Open License v1.0 covers commercial use only below $10M annual revenue; larger firms need a paid license, liquid says it is not recommended for agentic coding or complex multi-step reasoning because of its size, text-only; vision and audio need other LFM3 checkpoints, and no published per-token API price found. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.

The bottom line for this matchup

Inkling and LFM3-1.7B overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. Inkling holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Inkling for the first model release from mira murati's thinking machines lab (ex-openai cto) - one of the most closely-watched new labs in ai, LFM3-1.7B for very small open-weight text model - about 1.73b parameters with a 256k-token context for on-device use. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.

Want both Inkling and LFM3-1.7B without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling or LFM3-1.7B better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Inkling leans toward the first model release from mira murati's thinking machines lab (ex-openai cto) - one of the most closely-watched new labs in ai while LFM3-1.7B leans toward very small open-weight text model - about 1.73b parameters with a 256k-token context for on-device use, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Inkling or LFM3-1.7B?

They are priced almost identically, so cost will not decide between them.

Which has the bigger context window?

Inkling — 1M vs 256K tokens, about 3.9× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.

Can I use both Inkling and LFM3-1.7B together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Inkling, LFM3-1.7B and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Inkling or LFM3-1.7B?

LFM3-1.7B — released October 27, 2026, about 3 months after Inkling.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.