Pick Grok Code Fast 1 for fast, cheap agentic coding at $0.20/$1.50 or low-latency code generation and terminal tasks. Pick Mistral Medium 3 for strong cost-to-capability at $0.40/$2.00 or general reasoning, coding and multimodal tasks. On a tight budget at scale, Grok Code Fast 1 is the value pick.
Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI, US) and Mistral Medium 3 (Mistral AI, France) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. Grok Code Fast 1 is xAI's speed-tier coding model at $0.20/$1.50 with a 256K window — cheap, fast agentic code over frontier quality. Mistral Medium 3 is mistral's mid-tier model at $0.40/$2.00 — efficient general capability with a 128K window, below the 1M-context frontier tier. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences
Price: Grok Code Fast 1 is about 2× cheaper on input ($0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens vs $0.4/$2 per 1M tokens) — meaningful once you are processing millions of tokens a month.
Context window: Grok Code Fast 1 holds 2× more — 256K (~384 pages) vs 128K (~192 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
Recency: Grok Code Fast 1 is the newer model by about 4 months (released August 28, 2025), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Ecosystem: this is a US-vs-France matchup — they differ in pricing philosophy, data-residency options, and tooling ecosystems, not only benchmarks.
Specifications
Spec
Grok Code Fast 1
Mistral Medium 3
Provider
xAI (US)
Mistral AI (France)
Released
August 28, 2025
May 7, 2025
Context window
256K (~384 pages)
128K (~192 pages)
Price (in/out)
$0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens
$0.4/$2 per 1M tokens
Open weight?
No — API only
No — API only
Modalities
text, code
text, image, code
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
Fast, cheap agentic coding at $0.20/$1.50: Grok Code Fast 1 — At $0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens it undercuts Mistral Medium 3 ($0.4/$2 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.
Low-latency code generation and terminal tasks: Grok Code Fast 1 — XAI's speed-tier coding model at $0.20/$1.50 with a 256K window — cheap, fast agentic code over frontier quality — and it runs cheaper at $0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens.
High-volume coding pipelines where speed beats peak quality: Grok Code Fast 1 — XAI's speed-tier coding model at $0.20/$1.50 with a 256K window — cheap, fast agentic code over frontier quality — and it carries the larger 256K context.
Strong cost-to-capability at $0.40/$2.00: Mistral Medium 3 — Mistral Medium 3 lists strong cost-to-capability at $0.40/$2.00 among its strengths; Grok Code Fast 1 does not.
General reasoning, coding and multimodal tasks: Mistral Medium 3 — Grok Code Fast 1 is comparatively weak here — a speed-tier coding model, not a frontier reasoner
Efficient mid-tier deployment for production workloads: Mistral Medium 3 — Mistral Medium 3 lists efficient mid-tier deployment for production workloads among its strengths; Grok Code Fast 1 does not.
Lowest cost at scale: Grok Code Fast 1 — At $0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Largest single-prompt input: Grok Code Fast 1 — Its 256K window is about 2× larger than Mistral Medium 3's 128K, fitting roughly 384 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume: Grok Code Fast 1 — At $0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens it undercuts Mistral Medium 3, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases: Grok Code Fast 1 — Larger 256K window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is fast, cheap agentic coding at $0.20/$1.50: Grok Code Fast 1 — It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is strong cost-to-capability at $0.40/$2.00: Mistral Medium 3 — That is its strongest area.
An enterprise with regional data-residency rules: Grok Code Fast 1 or Mistral Medium 3 — Origin (US vs France) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.
Grok Code Fast 1: where it fits
XAI's speed-tier coding model at $0.20/$1.50 with a 256K window — cheap, fast agentic code over frontier quality. Released August 28, 2025 by xAI, it is built for fast, cheap agentic coding at $0.20/$1.50, low-latency code generation and terminal tasks, high-volume coding pipelines where speed beats peak quality, and a 256K window sized for real codebases.
Its trade-offs are real: text and code only — no image, audio or video input, xAI did not publish a SWE-Bench Verified score, a speed-tier coding model, not a frontier reasoner, and narrow focus — built for code, not general knowledge work. At $0.2 in / $1.5 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
Mistral Medium 3: where it fits
Mistral's mid-tier model at $0.40/$2.00 — efficient general capability with a 128K window, below the 1M-context frontier tier. Released May 7, 2025 by Mistral AI, it is built for strong cost-to-capability at $0.40/$2.00, general reasoning, coding and multimodal tasks, efficient mid-tier deployment for production workloads, and text and image input.
Its trade-offs: a 128K context — smaller than the 1M-window flagships here, no published SWE-Bench Verified score, a mid-tier model, not a frontier reasoner, and proprietary, unlike Mistral's open-weight releases. At $0.4 in / $2 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
This is less "which is smarter" and more "which ecosystem fits." Grok Code Fast 1 (US) and Mistral Medium 3 (France) differ on pricing philosophy, data-residency, and tooling as much as on raw scores. Grok Code Fast 1 is the cheaper option, which matters at volume. The pragmatic move is to run one real task through both and judge the outputs against your own constraints — including where your data is allowed to be processed.
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok Code Fast 1 or Mistral Medium 3 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Grok Code Fast 1 leans toward fast, cheap agentic coding at $0.20/$1.50 while Mistral Medium 3 leans toward strong cost-to-capability at $0.40/$2.00, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Grok Code Fast 1 or Mistral Medium 3?
Grok Code Fast 1 is cheaper — $0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens vs $0.4/$2 per 1M tokens, roughly 2× apart on input.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok Code Fast 1 — 256K vs 128K, about 2× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Grok Code Fast 1 and Mistral Medium 3 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Grok Code Fast 1, Mistral Medium 3 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Grok Code Fast 1 or Mistral Medium 3?
Grok Code Fast 1 — released August 28, 2025, about 4 months after Mistral Medium 3.
Grok Code Fast 1 vs Mistral Medium 3
xAI · US | Mistral AI · France · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick Grok Code Fast 1 for fast, cheap agentic coding at $0.20/$1.50 or low-latency code generation and terminal tasks. Pick Mistral Medium 3 for strong cost-to-capability at $0.40/$2.00 or general reasoning, coding and multimodal tasks. On a tight budget at scale, Grok Code Fast 1 is the value pick.
Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI, US) and Mistral Medium 3 (Mistral AI, France) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. Grok Code Fast 1 is xAI's speed-tier coding model at $0.20/$1.50 with a 256K window — cheap, fast agentic code over frontier quality. Mistral Medium 3 is mistral's mid-tier model at $0.40/$2.00 — efficient general capability with a 128K window, below the 1M-context frontier tier. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
▸Price: Grok Code Fast 1 is about 2× cheaper on input ($0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens vs $0.4/$2 per 1M tokens) — meaningful once you are processing millions of tokens a month.
▸Context window: Grok Code Fast 1 holds 2× more — 256K (~384 pages) vs 128K (~192 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
▸Recency: Grok Code Fast 1 is the newer model by about 4 months (released August 28, 2025), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
▸Ecosystem: this is a US-vs-France matchup — they differ in pricing philosophy, data-residency options, and tooling ecosystems, not only benchmarks.
Side-by-side specs
Spec
Grok Code Fast 1
Mistral Medium 3
Provider
xAI (US)
Mistral AI (France)
Released
August 28, 2025
May 7, 2025
Context window
256K (~384 pages)
128K (~192 pages)
Price (in/out)
$0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens
$0.4/$2 per 1M tokens
Open weight?
No — API only
No — API only
Modalities
text, code
text, image, code
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
Fast, cheap agentic coding at $0.20/$1.50
Grok Code Fast 1
At $0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens it undercuts Mistral Medium 3 ($0.4/$2 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.
Low-latency code generation and terminal tasks
Grok Code Fast 1
XAI's speed-tier coding model at $0.20/$1.50 with a 256K window — cheap, fast agentic code over frontier quality — and it runs cheaper at $0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens.
High-volume coding pipelines where speed beats peak quality
Grok Code Fast 1
XAI's speed-tier coding model at $0.20/$1.50 with a 256K window — cheap, fast agentic code over frontier quality — and it carries the larger 256K context.
Strong cost-to-capability at $0.40/$2.00
Mistral Medium 3
Mistral Medium 3 lists strong cost-to-capability at $0.40/$2.00 among its strengths; Grok Code Fast 1 does not.
General reasoning, coding and multimodal tasks
Mistral Medium 3
Grok Code Fast 1 is comparatively weak here — a speed-tier coding model, not a frontier reasoner
Efficient mid-tier deployment for production workloads
Mistral Medium 3
Mistral Medium 3 lists efficient mid-tier deployment for production workloads among its strengths; Grok Code Fast 1 does not.
Lowest cost at scale
Grok Code Fast 1
At $0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Largest single-prompt input
Grok Code Fast 1
Its 256K window is about 2× larger than Mistral Medium 3's 128K, fitting roughly 384 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ Grok Code Fast 1
At $0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens it undercuts Mistral Medium 3, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ Grok Code Fast 1
Larger 256K window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is fast, cheap agentic coding at $0.20/$1.50
→ Grok Code Fast 1
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is strong cost-to-capability at $0.40/$2.00
→ Mistral Medium 3
That is its strongest area.
An enterprise with regional data-residency rules
→ Grok Code Fast 1 or Mistral Medium 3
Origin (US vs France) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.
Grok Code Fast 1: where it fits
XAI's speed-tier coding model at $0.20/$1.50 with a 256K window — cheap, fast agentic code over frontier quality. Released August 28, 2025 by xAI, it is built for fast, cheap agentic coding at $0.20/$1.50, low-latency code generation and terminal tasks, high-volume coding pipelines where speed beats peak quality, and a 256K window sized for real codebases.
Its trade-offs are real: text and code only — no image, audio or video input, xAI did not publish a SWE-Bench Verified score, a speed-tier coding model, not a frontier reasoner, and narrow focus — built for code, not general knowledge work. At $0.2 in / $1.5 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
Mistral Medium 3: where it fits
Mistral's mid-tier model at $0.40/$2.00 — efficient general capability with a 128K window, below the 1M-context frontier tier. Released May 7, 2025 by Mistral AI, it is built for strong cost-to-capability at $0.40/$2.00, general reasoning, coding and multimodal tasks, efficient mid-tier deployment for production workloads, and text and image input.
Its trade-offs: a 128K context — smaller than the 1M-window flagships here, no published SWE-Bench Verified score, a mid-tier model, not a frontier reasoner, and proprietary, unlike Mistral's open-weight releases. At $0.4 in / $2 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
This is less "which is smarter" and more "which ecosystem fits." Grok Code Fast 1 (US) and Mistral Medium 3 (France) differ on pricing philosophy, data-residency, and tooling as much as on raw scores. Grok Code Fast 1 is the cheaper option, which matters at volume. The pragmatic move is to run one real task through both and judge the outputs against your own constraints — including where your data is allowed to be processed.
Want both Grok Code Fast 1 and Mistral Medium 3 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
Is Grok Code Fast 1 or Mistral Medium 3 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Grok Code Fast 1 leans toward fast, cheap agentic coding at $0.20/$1.50 while Mistral Medium 3 leans toward strong cost-to-capability at $0.40/$2.00, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Grok Code Fast 1 or Mistral Medium 3?
Grok Code Fast 1 is cheaper — $0.2/$1.5 per 1M tokens vs $0.4/$2 per 1M tokens, roughly 2× apart on input.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok Code Fast 1 — 256K vs 128K, about 2× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Grok Code Fast 1 and Mistral Medium 3 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Grok Code Fast 1, Mistral Medium 3 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Grok Code Fast 1 or Mistral Medium 3?
Grok Code Fast 1 — released August 28, 2025, about 4 months after Mistral Medium 3.
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.