gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

OpenAI · US  |  MiniMax · China · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick gpt-oss-120b for self-hostable on a single 80gb h100 gpu via mxfp4 or configurable reasoning depth (low/medium/high). Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for $0.15/$0.60 per million tokens (cached $0.015) with flat pricing regardless of prompt length or 428b-parameter moe (about 23b active) with weights on hugging face from october 23, 2026. On a tight budget at scale, gpt-oss-120b is the value pick.

gpt-oss-120b (OpenAI, US) and MiniMax M3.1 Flash (MiniMax, China) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. gpt-oss-120b is openAI's open-weight 117B-parameter MoE reasoning model (5.1B active) that runs on a single 80GB GPU and approaches o4-mini on reasoning, coding, and tool use. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is miniMax's October 19, 2026 always-thinking agentic Flash model - 1M context, text/image/video input, $0.15/$0.60 and open weights under a community license. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

Specgpt-oss-120bMiniMax M3.1 Flash
ProviderOpenAI (US) MiniMax (China)
ReleasedAugust 5, 2025 October 19, 2026
Context window131K (~197 pages) 1M tokens (~1,500 pages)
Price (in/out)Open weight (self-host / free) $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens
Open weight?Yes — self-hostable Yes — self-hostable
Modalitiestext, code text, image, video, code
SWE-Bench Verified62.4% Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Self-hostable on a single 80GB H100 GPU via MXFP4

gpt-oss-120b

gpt-oss-120b lists self-hostable on a single 80GB H100 GPU via MXFP4 among its strengths; MiniMax M3.1 Flash does not.

Configurable reasoning depth (low/medium/high)

gpt-oss-120b

gpt-oss-120b lists configurable reasoning depth (low/medium/high) among its strengths; MiniMax M3.1 Flash does not.

Agentic tool use, function calling, and code execution

gpt-oss-120b

gpt-oss-120b lists agentic tool use, function calling, and code execution among its strengths; MiniMax M3.1 Flash does not.

$0.15/$0.60 per million tokens (cached $0.015) with flat pricing regardless of prompt length

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Its 1M tokens window holds about 7.6× more than gpt-oss-120b's 131K in a single prompt.

428B-parameter MoE (about 23B active) with weights on Hugging Face from October 23, 2026

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

gpt-oss-120b is comparatively weak here — 131K context and 5.1B active params trail the largest frontier closed models

DeepSWE v1.1 of 73.7% and OSWorld V2 of 61.7 (MiniMax-reported)

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax's October 19, 2026 always-thinking agentic Flash model - 1M context, text/image/video input, $0.15/$0.60 and open weights under a community license — and it carries the larger 1M tokens context.

Lowest cost at scale

gpt-oss-120b

Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of MiniMax M3.1 Flash's $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.

Largest single-prompt input

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Its 1M tokens window is about 7.6× larger than gpt-oss-120b's 131K, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

→ gpt-oss-120b

At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts MiniMax M3.1 Flash, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

→ MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Larger 1M tokens window fits more in one prompt.

Anyone whose priority is self-hostable on a single 80gb h100 gpu via mxfp4

→ gpt-oss-120b

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is $0.15/$0.60 per million tokens (cached $0.015) with flat pricing regardless of prompt length

→ MiniMax M3.1 Flash

That is its strongest area.

An enterprise with regional data-residency rules

→ gpt-oss-120b or MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Origin (US vs China) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.

gpt-oss-120b: where it fits

OpenAI's open-weight 117B-parameter MoE reasoning model (5.1B active) that runs on a single 80GB GPU and approaches o4-mini on reasoning, coding, and tool use. Released August 5, 2025 by OpenAI, it is built for self-hostable on a single 80GB H100 GPU via MXFP4, configurable reasoning depth (low/medium/high), agentic tool use, function calling, and code execution, and full chain-of-thought visibility for debugging.

Its trade-offs are real: text-only, no image, audio, or video input, and 131K context and 5.1B active params trail the largest frontier closed models. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: where it fits

MiniMax's October 19, 2026 always-thinking agentic Flash model - 1M context, text/image/video input, $0.15/$0.60 and open weights under a community license. Released October 19, 2026 by MiniMax, it is built for $0.15/$0.60 per million tokens (cached $0.015) with flat pricing regardless of prompt length, 428B-parameter MoE (about 23B active) with weights on Hugging Face from October 23, 2026, deepSWE v1.1 of 73.7% and OSWorld V2 of 61.7 (MiniMax-reported), and artificial Analysis Intelligence Index of 42, 13 points above MiniMax M3.

Its trade-offs: thinking is always on and default effort is max, which inflates output-token cost, behind DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on Artificial Analysis's independent index, custom MiniMax Community license: attribution required, and products above $20M annual revenue need written authorization, and benchmarks are mostly self-reported; no SWE-bench Verified figure published. At $0.15 in / $0.6 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

This is less "which is smarter" and more "which ecosystem fits." gpt-oss-120b (US) and MiniMax M3.1 Flash (China) differ on pricing philosophy, data-residency, and tooling as much as on raw scores. gpt-oss-120b is the cheaper option, which matters at volume. The pragmatic move is to run one real task through both and judge the outputs against your own constraints — including where your data is allowed to be processed.

Want both gpt-oss-120b and MiniMax M3.1 Flash without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is gpt-oss-120b or MiniMax M3.1 Flash better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for MiniMax M3.1 Flash, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, gpt-oss-120b leans toward self-hostable on a single 80gb h100 gpu via mxfp4 while MiniMax M3.1 Flash leans toward $0.15/$0.60 per million tokens (cached $0.015) with flat pricing regardless of prompt length, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-120b or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

gpt-oss-120b is cheaper — Open weight (self-host / free) vs $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash — 1M tokens vs 131K, about 7.6× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.

Can I use both gpt-oss-120b and MiniMax M3.1 Flash together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you gpt-oss-120b, MiniMax M3.1 Flash and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, gpt-oss-120b or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash — released October 19, 2026, about 15 months after gpt-oss-120b.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.