GPT-5.2 vs Muse Spark 1.1
OpenAI · US | Meta · US · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick GPT-5.2 for strong all-round reasoning or reliable structured output. Pick Muse Spark 1.1 for scaled tool use — 88.1 on mcp atlas, ahead of opus 4.8 and gpt-5.5 (vendor-reported) or subagent orchestration — trained to run as a main agent or a subagent that escalates when stuck. On a tight budget at scale, Muse Spark 1.1 is the value pick.
GPT-5.2 (OpenAI) and Muse Spark 1.1 (Meta) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. GPT-5.2 is a capable GPT-5-generation all-rounder, now succeeded by GPT-5.5. Muse Spark 1.1 is meta's first paid, closed-weight frontier model — class-leading agentic tool use at a quarter of rivals' price, but it trails on coding. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
- ▸Price: Muse Spark 1.1 is about 1.4× cheaper on input ($1.25/$4.25 per 1M tokens vs $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens) — modest, but it adds up at steady volume.
- ▸Context window: Muse Spark 1.1 holds 2.6× more — 1M (~1,573 pages) vs 400K (~600 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
- ▸Recency: Muse Spark 1.1 is the newer model by about 7 months (released July 9, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | GPT-5.2 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI (US) | Meta (US) |
| Released | December 11, 2025 | July 9, 2026 |
| Context window | 400K (~600 pages) | 1M (~1,573 pages) |
| Price (in/out) | $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens | $1.25/$4.25 per 1M tokens |
| Open weight? | No — API only | No — API only |
| Modalities | text, image, code | text, image, video, code |
| SWE-Bench Verified | Not published | Not published |
| MRCR v2 @ 1M | Not published | 54.1% |
Who wins what
Strong all-round reasoning
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 lists strong all-round reasoning among its strengths; Muse Spark 1.1 does not.
Reliable structured output
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 lists reliable structured output among its strengths; Muse Spark 1.1 does not.
Broad ecosystem and tooling
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 lists broad ecosystem and tooling among its strengths; Muse Spark 1.1 does not.
Scaled tool use — 88.1 on MCP Atlas, ahead of Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 (vendor-reported)
Muse Spark 1.1
At $1.25/$4.25 per 1M tokens it undercuts GPT-5.2 ($1.75/$14 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.
Subagent orchestration — trained to run as a main agent or a subagent that escalates when stuck
Muse Spark 1.1
Meta's first paid, closed-weight frontier model — class-leading agentic tool use at a quarter of rivals' price, but it trails on coding — and it runs cheaper at $1.25/$4.25 per 1M tokens.
Professional agentic work — 54.7 on JobBench, a wide margin over rivals (vendor-reported)
Muse Spark 1.1
Meta's first paid, closed-weight frontier model — class-leading agentic tool use at a quarter of rivals' price, but it trails on coding — and it carries the larger 1M context.
Lowest cost at scale
Muse Spark 1.1
At $1.25/$4.25 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Largest single-prompt input
Muse Spark 1.1
Its 1M window is about 2.6× larger than GPT-5.2's 400K, fitting roughly 1,573 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ Muse Spark 1.1
At $1.25/$4.25 per 1M tokens it undercuts GPT-5.2, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ Muse Spark 1.1
Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is strong all-round reasoning
→ GPT-5.2
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is scaled tool use — 88.1 on mcp atlas, ahead of opus 4.8 and gpt-5.5 (vendor-reported)
→ Muse Spark 1.1
That is its strongest area.
GPT-5.2: where it fits
A capable GPT-5-generation all-rounder, now succeeded by GPT-5.5. Released December 11, 2025 by OpenAI, it is built for strong all-round reasoning, reliable structured output, broad ecosystem and tooling, and professional workflows.
Its trade-offs are real: superseded by GPT-5.5, and smaller context than flagships. At $1.75 in / $14 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
Muse Spark 1.1: where it fits
Meta's first paid, closed-weight frontier model — class-leading agentic tool use at a quarter of rivals' price, but it trails on coding. Released July 9, 2026 by Meta, it is built for scaled tool use — 88.1 on MCP Atlas, ahead of Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 (vendor-reported), subagent orchestration — trained to run as a main agent or a subagent that escalates when stuck, professional agentic work — 54.7 on JobBench, a wide margin over rivals (vendor-reported), and managing its own context: it compacts the 1M window mid-run instead of relying on external windowing.
Its trade-offs: not the coding leader its launch framing implied — Meta's own report concedes it trails Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 on every coding benchmark, the 1M window oversells its recall: 54.1 on MRCR v2 at 1M against GPT-5.5's 74.0, closed weights end the free, self-hostable Llama path — this is the first model Meta has charged for, and uS-only public preview behind a waitlist, and every benchmark is vendor-reported with no third-party replication. At $1.25 in / $4.25 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
GPT-5.2 and Muse Spark 1.1 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. Muse Spark 1.1 costs less per token; Muse Spark 1.1 holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — GPT-5.2 for strong all-round reasoning, Muse Spark 1.1 for scaled tool use — 88.1 on mcp atlas, ahead of opus 4.8 and gpt-5.5 (vendor-reported). Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Want both GPT-5.2 and Muse Spark 1.1 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
See pricingFrequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, GPT-5.2 leans toward strong all-round reasoning while Muse Spark 1.1 leans toward scaled tool use — 88.1 on mcp atlas, ahead of opus 4.8 and gpt-5.5 (vendor-reported), and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 or Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper — $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens vs $1.25/$4.25 per 1M tokens, roughly 1.4× apart on input.
Which has the bigger context window?
Muse Spark 1.1 — 1M vs 400K, about 2.6× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both GPT-5.2 and Muse Spark 1.1 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you GPT-5.2, Muse Spark 1.1 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, GPT-5.2 or Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 — released July 9, 2026, about 7 months after GPT-5.2.
Related comparisons
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.