Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 for agentic coding — 77.2% on swe-bench verified, the best score any model had posted at its launch or computer use and gui automation (61.4% osworld at launch). Pick GPT-5.2 for strong all-round reasoning or reliable structured output. On a tight budget at scale, GPT-5.2 is the value pick.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.2 (OpenAI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is september 2025's coding state of the art at $3/$15 — still supported, but 200K-capped and twice superseded. GPT-5.2 is a capable GPT-5-generation all-rounder, now succeeded by GPT-5.5. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences
Price: GPT-5.2 is about 1.7× cheaper on input ($1.75/$14 per 1M tokens vs $3/$15 per 1M tokens) — modest, but it adds up at steady volume.
Context window: GPT-5.2 holds 2× more — 400K (~600 pages) vs 200K (~300 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
Recency: GPT-5.2 is the newer model by about 2 months (released December 11, 2025), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Specifications
Spec
Claude Sonnet 4.5
GPT-5.2
Provider
Anthropic (US)
OpenAI (US)
Released
September 29, 2025
December 11, 2025
Context window
200K (~300 pages)
400K (~600 pages)
Price (in/out)
$3/$15 per 1M tokens
$1.75/$14 per 1M tokens
Open weight?
No — API only
No — API only
Modalities
text, image, code
text, image, code
SWE-Bench Verified
77.2%
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
Agentic coding — 77.2% on SWE-Bench Verified, the best score any model had posted at its launch: Claude Sonnet 4.5 — Claude Sonnet 4.5 lists agentic coding — 77.2% on SWE-Bench Verified, the best score any model had posted at its launch among its strengths; GPT-5.2 does not.
Computer use and GUI automation (61.4% OSWorld at launch): Claude Sonnet 4.5 — Claude Sonnet 4.5 lists computer use and GUI automation (61.4% OSWorld at launch) among its strengths; GPT-5.2 does not.
Long-horizon autonomy — Anthropic reported 30+ hours of sustained focus on multi-step tasks: Claude Sonnet 4.5 — Claude Sonnet 4.5 lists long-horizon autonomy — Anthropic reported 30+ hours of sustained focus on multi-step tasks among its strengths; GPT-5.2 does not.
Strong all-round reasoning: GPT-5.2 — A capable GPT-5-generation all-rounder, now succeeded by GPT-5.5 — and it runs cheaper at $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens.
Reliable structured output: GPT-5.2 — Claude Sonnet 4.5 is comparatively weak here — missing the modern API surface: no adaptive thinking, no effort control, and half the max output of newer Sonnets
Broad ecosystem and tooling: GPT-5.2 — A capable GPT-5-generation all-rounder, now succeeded by GPT-5.5 — and it carries the larger 400K context.
Lowest cost at scale: GPT-5.2 — At $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Largest single-prompt input: GPT-5.2 — Its 400K window is about 2× larger than Claude Sonnet 4.5's 200K, fitting roughly 600 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume: GPT-5.2 — At $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens it undercuts Claude Sonnet 4.5, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases: GPT-5.2 — Larger 400K window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is agentic coding — 77.2% on swe-bench verified, the best score any model had posted at its launch: Claude Sonnet 4.5 — It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is strong all-round reasoning: GPT-5.2 — That is its strongest area.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: where it fits
September 2025's coding state of the art at $3/$15 — still supported, but 200K-capped and twice superseded. Released September 29, 2025 by Anthropic, it is built for agentic coding — 77.2% on SWE-Bench Verified, the best score any model had posted at its launch, computer use and GUI automation (61.4% OSWorld at launch), long-horizon autonomy — Anthropic reported 30+ hours of sustained focus on multi-step tasks, and tracking its own remaining token budget natively, which few models do.
Its trade-offs are real: superseded twice — Sonnet 4.6 and Sonnet 5 match or beat it at the same or lower price, capped at 200K since Anthropic retired its 1M beta in April 2026, while its successors ship 1M as standard, and missing the modern API surface: no adaptive thinking, no effort control, and half the max output of newer Sonnets. At $3 in / $15 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
GPT-5.2: where it fits
A capable GPT-5-generation all-rounder, now succeeded by GPT-5.5. Released December 11, 2025 by OpenAI, it is built for strong all-round reasoning, reliable structured output, broad ecosystem and tooling, and professional workflows.
Its trade-offs: superseded by GPT-5.5, and smaller context than flagships. At $1.75 in / $14 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5.2 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. GPT-5.2 costs less per token; GPT-5.2 holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Claude Sonnet 4.5 for agentic coding — 77.2% on swe-bench verified, the best score any model had posted at its launch, GPT-5.2 for strong all-round reasoning. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-5.2 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for GPT-5.2, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Claude Sonnet 4.5 leans toward agentic coding — 77.2% on swe-bench verified, the best score any model had posted at its launch while GPT-5.2 leans toward strong all-round reasoning, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-5.2?
GPT-5.2 is cheaper — $3/$15 per 1M tokens vs $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens, roughly 1.7× apart on input.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.2 — 400K vs 200K, about 2× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5.2 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-5.2 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-5.2?
GPT-5.2 — released December 11, 2025, about 2 months after Claude Sonnet 4.5.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5.2
Anthropic · US | OpenAI · US · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 for agentic coding — 77.2% on swe-bench verified, the best score any model had posted at its launch or computer use and gui automation (61.4% osworld at launch). Pick GPT-5.2 for strong all-round reasoning or reliable structured output. On a tight budget at scale, GPT-5.2 is the value pick.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.2 (OpenAI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is september 2025's coding state of the art at $3/$15 — still supported, but 200K-capped and twice superseded. GPT-5.2 is a capable GPT-5-generation all-rounder, now succeeded by GPT-5.5. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
▸Price: GPT-5.2 is about 1.7× cheaper on input ($1.75/$14 per 1M tokens vs $3/$15 per 1M tokens) — modest, but it adds up at steady volume.
▸Context window: GPT-5.2 holds 2× more — 400K (~600 pages) vs 200K (~300 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
▸Recency: GPT-5.2 is the newer model by about 2 months (released December 11, 2025), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
Spec
Claude Sonnet 4.5
GPT-5.2
Provider
Anthropic (US)
OpenAI (US)
Released
September 29, 2025
December 11, 2025
Context window
200K (~300 pages)
400K (~600 pages)
Price (in/out)
$3/$15 per 1M tokens
$1.75/$14 per 1M tokens
Open weight?
No — API only
No — API only
Modalities
text, image, code
text, image, code
SWE-Bench Verified
77.2%
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
Agentic coding — 77.2% on SWE-Bench Verified, the best score any model had posted at its launch
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 lists agentic coding — 77.2% on SWE-Bench Verified, the best score any model had posted at its launch among its strengths; GPT-5.2 does not.
Computer use and GUI automation (61.4% OSWorld at launch)
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 lists computer use and GUI automation (61.4% OSWorld at launch) among its strengths; GPT-5.2 does not.
Long-horizon autonomy — Anthropic reported 30+ hours of sustained focus on multi-step tasks
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 lists long-horizon autonomy — Anthropic reported 30+ hours of sustained focus on multi-step tasks among its strengths; GPT-5.2 does not.
Strong all-round reasoning
GPT-5.2
A capable GPT-5-generation all-rounder, now succeeded by GPT-5.5 — and it runs cheaper at $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens.
Reliable structured output
GPT-5.2
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is comparatively weak here — missing the modern API surface: no adaptive thinking, no effort control, and half the max output of newer Sonnets
Broad ecosystem and tooling
GPT-5.2
A capable GPT-5-generation all-rounder, now succeeded by GPT-5.5 — and it carries the larger 400K context.
Lowest cost at scale
GPT-5.2
At $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Largest single-prompt input
GPT-5.2
Its 400K window is about 2× larger than Claude Sonnet 4.5's 200K, fitting roughly 600 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ GPT-5.2
At $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens it undercuts Claude Sonnet 4.5, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ GPT-5.2
Larger 400K window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is agentic coding — 77.2% on swe-bench verified, the best score any model had posted at its launch
→ Claude Sonnet 4.5
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is strong all-round reasoning
→ GPT-5.2
That is its strongest area.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: where it fits
September 2025's coding state of the art at $3/$15 — still supported, but 200K-capped and twice superseded. Released September 29, 2025 by Anthropic, it is built for agentic coding — 77.2% on SWE-Bench Verified, the best score any model had posted at its launch, computer use and GUI automation (61.4% OSWorld at launch), long-horizon autonomy — Anthropic reported 30+ hours of sustained focus on multi-step tasks, and tracking its own remaining token budget natively, which few models do.
Its trade-offs are real: superseded twice — Sonnet 4.6 and Sonnet 5 match or beat it at the same or lower price, capped at 200K since Anthropic retired its 1M beta in April 2026, while its successors ship 1M as standard, and missing the modern API surface: no adaptive thinking, no effort control, and half the max output of newer Sonnets. At $3 in / $15 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
GPT-5.2: where it fits
A capable GPT-5-generation all-rounder, now succeeded by GPT-5.5. Released December 11, 2025 by OpenAI, it is built for strong all-round reasoning, reliable structured output, broad ecosystem and tooling, and professional workflows.
Its trade-offs: superseded by GPT-5.5, and smaller context than flagships. At $1.75 in / $14 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5.2 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. GPT-5.2 costs less per token; GPT-5.2 holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Claude Sonnet 4.5 for agentic coding — 77.2% on swe-bench verified, the best score any model had posted at its launch, GPT-5.2 for strong all-round reasoning. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Want both Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5.2 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-5.2 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for GPT-5.2, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Claude Sonnet 4.5 leans toward agentic coding — 77.2% on swe-bench verified, the best score any model had posted at its launch while GPT-5.2 leans toward strong all-round reasoning, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-5.2?
GPT-5.2 is cheaper — $3/$15 per 1M tokens vs $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens, roughly 1.7× apart on input.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.2 — 400K vs 200K, about 2× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5.2 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-5.2 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-5.2?
GPT-5.2 — released December 11, 2025, about 2 months after Claude Sonnet 4.5.
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.