GPT-5.1 vs LFM3-1.7B

OpenAI · US  |  Liquid AI · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick GPT-5.1 for adaptive reasoning that scales compute to task difficulty or general-purpose reasoning, coding and tool use. Pick LFM3-1.7B for very small open-weight text model - about 1.73b parameters with a 256k-token context for on-device use or liquid says it can power agentic applications that used to need 9b parameters. Choose LFM3-1.7B if you need self-hosting or data privacy; GPT-5.1 if you want a managed API.

GPT-5.1 (OpenAI) and LFM3-1.7B (Liquid AI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. GPT-5.1 is openAI's late-2025 GPT-5.1 at $1.25/$10 — a capable general model since surpassed by the GPT-5.2–5.6 line. LFM3-1.7B is liquid AI's October 27, 2026 on-device text model - about 1.73B parameters and 256K context, with open weights under a license capped at $10M annual revenue. They diverge most on price, context window and open vs. closed weights — each quantified below from the models' real specs.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecGPT-5.1LFM3-1.7B
ProviderOpenAI (US) Liquid AI (US)
ReleasedNovember 13, 2025 October 27, 2026
Context window400K (~600 pages) 256K tokens (~384 pages)
Price (in/out)$1.25/$10 per 1M tokens Open weight (self-host / free)
Open weight?No — API only Yes — self-hostable
Modalitiestext, image, code text
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Adaptive reasoning that scales compute to task difficulty

GPT-5.1

LFM3-1.7B is comparatively weak here — liquid says it is not recommended for agentic coding or complex multi-step reasoning because of its size

General-purpose reasoning, coding and tool use

GPT-5.1

OpenAI's late-2025 GPT-5.1 at $1.25/$10 — a capable general model since surpassed by the GPT-5.2–5.6 line — and it carries the larger 400K context.

A large ~400K context for long documents and sessions

GPT-5.1

Its 400K window holds about 1.6× more than LFM3-1.7B's 256K tokens in a single prompt.

Very small open-weight text model - about 1.73B parameters with a 256K-token context for on-device use

LFM3-1.7B

Open weights make this possible at all — GPT-5.1 is API-only, so it cannot leave the vendor's servers.

Liquid says it can power agentic applications that used to need 9B parameters

LFM3-1.7B

Liquid AI's October 27, 2026 on-device text model - about 1.73B parameters and 256K context, with open weights under a license capped at $10M annual revenue — and its weights are open while GPT-5.1 is API-only.

Part of a six-model LFM3 family covering text, vision, audio, omni and decision tasks

LFM3-1.7B

GPT-5.1 is comparatively weak here — premium output price at $10/1M for a now-older model

Lowest cost at scale

LFM3-1.7B

Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of GPT-5.1's $1.25/$10 per 1M tokens.

Largest single-prompt input

GPT-5.1

Its 400K window is about 1.6× larger than LFM3-1.7B's 256K tokens, fitting roughly 600 pages in one prompt.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

→ LFM3-1.7B

At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts GPT-5.1, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

→ GPT-5.1

Larger 400K window fits more in one prompt.

A team with data-privacy or self-hosting needs

→ LFM3-1.7B

Open weights let you run it on your own hardware; GPT-5.1 is API-only.

Anyone whose priority is adaptive reasoning that scales compute to task difficulty

→ GPT-5.1

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is very small open-weight text model - about 1.73b parameters with a 256k-token context for on-device use

→ LFM3-1.7B

That is its strongest area.

GPT-5.1: where it fits

OpenAI's late-2025 GPT-5.1 at $1.25/$10 — a capable general model since surpassed by the GPT-5.2–5.6 line. Released November 13, 2025 by OpenAI, it is built for adaptive reasoning that scales compute to task difficulty, general-purpose reasoning, coding and tool use, a large ~400K context for long documents and sessions, and text and image input.

Its trade-offs are real: superseded by GPT-5.2 through GPT-5.6 — kept for compatibility rather than being current, no reliably published SWE-Bench Verified figure, exact context window unconfirmed (400K vs 410K across trackers), and premium output price at $10/1M for a now-older model. At $1.25 in / $10 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

LFM3-1.7B: where it fits

Liquid AI's October 27, 2026 on-device text model - about 1.73B parameters and 256K context, with open weights under a license capped at $10M annual revenue. Released October 27, 2026 by Liquid AI, it is built for very small open-weight text model - about 1.73B parameters with a 256K-token context for on-device use, liquid says it can power agentic applications that used to need 9B parameters, part of a six-model LFM3 family covering text, vision, audio, omni and decision tasks, and supports 16 languages.

Its trade-offs: lFM Open License v1.0 covers commercial use only below $10M annual revenue; larger firms need a paid license, liquid says it is not recommended for agentic coding or complex multi-step reasoning because of its size, text-only; vision and audio need other LFM3 checkpoints, and no published per-token API price found. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.

The bottom line for this matchup

The defining split here is open vs. closed. LFM3-1.7B gives you weights you control — self-host it, fine-tune it, keep data in-house, pay only for hardware. GPT-5.1 gives you a managed, always-updated API with no infrastructure to run. Teams with GPUs, privacy requirements, or huge volume often favour the open model; teams that want zero ops and the latest capabilities favour the closed one. Capability is close enough that this operational question, not the benchmark, usually decides it.

Want both GPT-5.1 and LFM3-1.7B without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.1 or LFM3-1.7B better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, GPT-5.1 leans toward adaptive reasoning that scales compute to task difficulty while LFM3-1.7B leans toward very small open-weight text model - about 1.73b parameters with a 256k-token context for on-device use, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1 or LFM3-1.7B?

LFM3-1.7B is open-weight, so self-hosting means no per-token fee (you pay for hardware instead), while GPT-5.1 is API-metered at $1.25/$10 per 1M tokens. For most teams without GPUs, the API model is cheaper to start; at very high volume, self-hosting can win.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.1 — 400K vs 256K tokens, about 1.6× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.

Can I use both GPT-5.1 and LFM3-1.7B together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you GPT-5.1, LFM3-1.7B and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, GPT-5.1 or LFM3-1.7B?

LFM3-1.7B — released October 27, 2026, about 12 months after GPT-5.1.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.