Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B for fast, cheap inference from a sparse moe (3.8b active of 25.2b total) or near-31b-dense quality at a fraction of the compute and memory-bandwidth cost. Pick North Mini Code for agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks or efficient sparse moe — 3b active of 30b, runs on a single h100. On a tight budget at scale, North Mini Code is the value pick.
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Google) and North Mini Code (Cohere) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Gemma 4 26B A4B is an Apache-2.0 open MoE with 25.2B total but only 3.8B active parameters, delivering near-31B-dense quality at a fraction of the inference cost. North Mini Code is cohere's first agentic coding model: an open-weight 30B/3B-active MoE built for real software-engineering and terminal tasks that runs on a single H100. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences
Context window: Gemma 4 26B A4B holds 1× more — 256K (~393 pages) vs 256K (~384 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
Recency: North Mini Code is the newer model by about 2 months (released June 9, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Specifications
Spec
Gemma 4 26B A4B
North Mini Code
Provider
Google (US)
Cohere (Global)
Released
April 2, 2026
June 9, 2026
Context window
256K (~393 pages)
256K (~384 pages)
Price (in/out)
$0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens
Open weight (self-host / free)
Open weight?
Yes — self-hostable
Yes — self-hostable
Modalities
text, image, video, code
text, code
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
67.6%
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
Fast, cheap inference from a sparse MoE (3.8B active of 25.2B total): Gemma 4 26B A4B — A core design strength of Gemma 4 26B A4B.
Near-31B-dense quality at a fraction of the compute and memory-bandwidth cost: Gemma 4 26B A4B — A core design strength of Gemma 4 26B A4B.
Strong reasoning and coding (88.3% AIME 2026 no-tools, 77.1% LiveCodeBench v6): Gemma 4 26B A4B — A core design strength of Gemma 4 26B A4B.
Agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks: North Mini Code — A core design strength of North Mini Code.
Efficient sparse MoE — 3B active of 30B, runs on a single H100: North Mini Code — A core design strength of North Mini Code.
High throughput (up to 2.8x Devstral Small 2) at low latency: North Mini Code — A core design strength of North Mini Code.
Lowest cost at scale: North Mini Code — At Open weight (self-host / free), it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Largest single-prompt input: Gemma 4 26B A4B — Its 256K window is about 1× larger, fitting roughly 393 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume: North Mini Code — At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts Gemma 4 26B A4B, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases: Gemma 4 26B A4B — Larger 256K window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is fast, cheap inference from a sparse moe (3.8b active of 25.2b total): Gemma 4 26B A4B — It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks: North Mini Code — That is its strongest area.
Gemma 4 26B A4B: where it fits
An Apache-2.0 open MoE with 25.2B total but only 3.8B active parameters, delivering near-31B-dense quality at a fraction of the inference cost. Released April 2, 2026 by Google, it is built for fast, cheap inference from a sparse MoE (3.8B active of 25.2B total), near-31B-dense quality at a fraction of the compute and memory-bandwidth cost, strong reasoning and coding (88.3% AIME 2026 no-tools, 77.1% LiveCodeBench v6), and multimodal input (text/image, plus video processed as frames up to 60s) with native function calling.
Its trade-offs are real: all 25.2B parameters must be loaded into memory even though only 3.8B are active per token, and 256K context trails 1M-token frontier rivals, and this variant has no audio input (audio is E2B/E4B/12B only). At $0.15 in / $0.6 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
North Mini Code: where it fits
Cohere's first agentic coding model: an open-weight 30B/3B-active MoE built for real software-engineering and terminal tasks that runs on a single H100. Released June 9, 2026 by Cohere, it is built for agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks, efficient sparse MoE — 3B active of 30B, runs on a single H100, high throughput (up to 2.8x Devstral Small 2) at low latency, and fully open weights under Apache 2.0 with fp8 and 4-bit builds.
Its trade-offs: text-only and coding-specialized — not multimodal or general-purpose, and 256K context and modest general-intelligence index trail frontier models. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.
The bottom line for this matchup
Gemma 4 26B A4B and North Mini Code overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. North Mini Code costs less per token; Gemma 4 26B A4B holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Gemma 4 26B A4B for fast, cheap inference from a sparse moe (3.8b active of 25.2b total), North Mini Code for agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B or North Mini Code better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for Gemma 4 26B A4B, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Gemma 4 26B A4B leans toward fast, cheap inference from a sparse moe (3.8b active of 25.2b total) while North Mini Code leans toward agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or North Mini Code?
North Mini Code is cheaper — $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens vs Open weight (self-host / free).
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 4 26B A4B — 256K vs 256K, about 1× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Gemma 4 26B A4B and North Mini Code together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Gemma 4 26B A4B, North Mini Code and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Gemma 4 26B A4B or North Mini Code?
North Mini Code — released June 9, 2026, about 2 months after Gemma 4 26B A4B.
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs North Mini Code
Google · US | Cohere · Global · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B for fast, cheap inference from a sparse moe (3.8b active of 25.2b total) or near-31b-dense quality at a fraction of the compute and memory-bandwidth cost. Pick North Mini Code for agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks or efficient sparse moe — 3b active of 30b, runs on a single h100. On a tight budget at scale, North Mini Code is the value pick.
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Google) and North Mini Code (Cohere) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Gemma 4 26B A4B is an Apache-2.0 open MoE with 25.2B total but only 3.8B active parameters, delivering near-31B-dense quality at a fraction of the inference cost. North Mini Code is cohere's first agentic coding model: an open-weight 30B/3B-active MoE built for real software-engineering and terminal tasks that runs on a single H100. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
▸Context window: Gemma 4 26B A4B holds 1× more — 256K (~393 pages) vs 256K (~384 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
▸Recency: North Mini Code is the newer model by about 2 months (released June 9, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
Spec
Gemma 4 26B A4B
North Mini Code
Provider
Google (US)
Cohere (Global)
Released
April 2, 2026
June 9, 2026
Context window
256K (~393 pages)
256K (~384 pages)
Price (in/out)
$0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens
Open weight (self-host / free)
Open weight?
Yes — self-hostable
Yes — self-hostable
Modalities
text, image, video, code
text, code
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
67.6%
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
Fast, cheap inference from a sparse MoE (3.8B active of 25.2B total)
Gemma 4 26B A4B
A core design strength of Gemma 4 26B A4B.
Near-31B-dense quality at a fraction of the compute and memory-bandwidth cost
Agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks
North Mini Code
A core design strength of North Mini Code.
Efficient sparse MoE — 3B active of 30B, runs on a single H100
North Mini Code
A core design strength of North Mini Code.
High throughput (up to 2.8x Devstral Small 2) at low latency
North Mini Code
A core design strength of North Mini Code.
Lowest cost at scale
North Mini Code
At Open weight (self-host / free), it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Largest single-prompt input
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Its 256K window is about 1× larger, fitting roughly 393 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ North Mini Code
At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts Gemma 4 26B A4B, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ Gemma 4 26B A4B
Larger 256K window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is fast, cheap inference from a sparse moe (3.8b active of 25.2b total)
→ Gemma 4 26B A4B
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks
→ North Mini Code
That is its strongest area.
Gemma 4 26B A4B: where it fits
An Apache-2.0 open MoE with 25.2B total but only 3.8B active parameters, delivering near-31B-dense quality at a fraction of the inference cost. Released April 2, 2026 by Google, it is built for fast, cheap inference from a sparse MoE (3.8B active of 25.2B total), near-31B-dense quality at a fraction of the compute and memory-bandwidth cost, strong reasoning and coding (88.3% AIME 2026 no-tools, 77.1% LiveCodeBench v6), and multimodal input (text/image, plus video processed as frames up to 60s) with native function calling.
Its trade-offs are real: all 25.2B parameters must be loaded into memory even though only 3.8B are active per token, and 256K context trails 1M-token frontier rivals, and this variant has no audio input (audio is E2B/E4B/12B only). At $0.15 in / $0.6 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
North Mini Code: where it fits
Cohere's first agentic coding model: an open-weight 30B/3B-active MoE built for real software-engineering and terminal tasks that runs on a single H100. Released June 9, 2026 by Cohere, it is built for agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks, efficient sparse MoE — 3B active of 30B, runs on a single H100, high throughput (up to 2.8x Devstral Small 2) at low latency, and fully open weights under Apache 2.0 with fp8 and 4-bit builds.
Its trade-offs: text-only and coding-specialized — not multimodal or general-purpose, and 256K context and modest general-intelligence index trail frontier models. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.
The bottom line for this matchup
Gemma 4 26B A4B and North Mini Code overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. North Mini Code costs less per token; Gemma 4 26B A4B holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Gemma 4 26B A4B for fast, cheap inference from a sparse moe (3.8b active of 25.2b total), North Mini Code for agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Want both Gemma 4 26B A4B and North Mini Code without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B or North Mini Code better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for Gemma 4 26B A4B, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Gemma 4 26B A4B leans toward fast, cheap inference from a sparse moe (3.8b active of 25.2b total) while North Mini Code leans toward agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or North Mini Code?
North Mini Code is cheaper — $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens vs Open weight (self-host / free).
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 4 26B A4B — 256K vs 256K, about 1× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Gemma 4 26B A4B and North Mini Code together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Gemma 4 26B A4B, North Mini Code and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Gemma 4 26B A4B or North Mini Code?
North Mini Code — released June 9, 2026, about 2 months after Gemma 4 26B A4B.
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.