Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Particle-1

Google · US  |  Particle AI · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash for strong intelligence-per-dollar - artificial analysis intelligence index 56 at introductory $0.75/$3.75 pricing or 1m-token context with full multimodal input (text, image, audio, video). Pick Particle-1 for token-efficient coding model, post-trained with reinforcement learning on deepseek v4.1 flash or particle reports 72.57% task pass rate versus 71.15% for deepseek v4.1 flash, at $0.2211 versus $0.3368 per task. On a tight budget at scale, Particle-1 is the value pick.

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google) and Particle-1 (Particle AI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Gemini 3.7 Flash is google's cheap, fast coding-and-agents workhorse - AA Index 56, a 1M context, and aggressive introductory pricing that beats GPT-5.6 Terra on value and speed. Particle-1 is particle AI's October 28, 2026 debut - a closed, token-efficient coding model post-trained on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, with 1M context at $0.25/$1.00 at peak rates. Their biggest split is price, and the breakdown below shows exactly how that plays out for your workload.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecGemini 3.7 FlashParticle-1
ProviderGoogle (US) Particle AI (US)
ReleasedAugust 13, 2026 October 28, 2026
Context window1M (~1,573 pages) 1M tokens (~1,573 pages)
Price (in/out)$0.75/$3.75 per 1M tokens $0.25/$1 per 1M tokens
Open weight?No — API only No — API only
Modalitiestext, image, audio, video, code text, image, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Strong intelligence-per-dollar - Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 56 at introductory $0.75/$3.75 pricing

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Particle-1 is comparatively weak here — pricing is inconsistent across sources: Particle's launch post said $0.30/$1.20 and OpenRouter shows $0.05/$0.50, while its billing docs say $0.25/$1.00

1M-token context with full multimodal input (text, image, audio, video)

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.7 Flash lists 1M-token context with full multimodal input (text, image, audio, video) among its strengths; Particle-1 does not.

Built for coding and agents, with roughly 3x faster output than GPT-5.6 Terra

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.7 Flash lists built for coding and agents, with roughly 3x faster output than GPT-5.6 Terra among its strengths; Particle-1 does not.

Token-efficient coding model, post-trained with reinforcement learning on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Particle-1

Gemini 3.7 Flash is comparatively weak here — trails GPT-5.6 Terra on the hardest repo-scale and terminal-agent coding

Particle reports 72.57% task pass rate versus 71.15% for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, at $0.2211 versus $0.3368 per task

Particle-1

Particle AI's October 28, 2026 debut - a closed, token-efficient coding model post-trained on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, with 1M context at $0.25/$1.00 at peak rates — and it runs cheaper at $0.25/$1 per 1M tokens.

Particle reports 28.4% to 52.2% fewer output tokens than the base model across four benchmarks

Particle-1

Gemini 3.7 Flash is comparatively weak here — a fast 'workhorse,' not Google's top-intelligence model (Gemini 3.1 Pro is still the flagship)

Lowest cost at scale

Particle-1

At $0.25/$1 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

→ Particle-1

At $0.25/$1 per 1M tokens it undercuts Gemini 3.7 Flash, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Anyone whose priority is strong intelligence-per-dollar - artificial analysis intelligence index 56 at introductory $0.75/$3.75 pricing

→ Gemini 3.7 Flash

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is token-efficient coding model, post-trained with reinforcement learning on deepseek v4.1 flash

→ Particle-1

That is its strongest area.

Gemini 3.7 Flash: where it fits

Google's cheap, fast coding-and-agents workhorse - AA Index 56, a 1M context, and aggressive introductory pricing that beats GPT-5.6 Terra on value and speed. Released August 13, 2026 by Google, it is built for strong intelligence-per-dollar - Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 56 at introductory $0.75/$3.75 pricing, 1M-token context with full multimodal input (text, image, audio, video), built for coding and agents, with roughly 3x faster output than GPT-5.6 Terra, and wins broad-coding and web-development benchmarks against GPT-5.6 Terra.

Its trade-offs are real: introductory pricing ($0.75/$3.75) reverts to $1.50/$7.50 on Jan 1, 2027, trails GPT-5.6 Terra on the hardest repo-scale and terminal-agent coding, a fast 'workhorse,' not Google's top-intelligence model (Gemini 3.1 Pro is still the flagship), and some benchmark gains are Google's own figures. At $0.75 in / $3.75 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

Particle-1: where it fits

Particle AI's October 28, 2026 debut - a closed, token-efficient coding model post-trained on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, with 1M context at $0.25/$1.00 at peak rates. Released October 28, 2026 by Particle AI, it is built for token-efficient coding model, post-trained with reinforcement learning on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, particle reports 72.57% task pass rate versus 71.15% for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, at $0.2211 versus $0.3368 per task, particle reports 28.4% to 52.2% fewer output tokens than the base model across four benchmarks, and peak API price of $0.25/$1.00 per million tokens, halved off-peak to $0.125/$0.50 (20:30-04:00 New York time).

Its trade-offs: aPI-only with no published weights, although its DeepSeek base model is open, all benchmarks are vendor-reported on Particle's own harness; none were independently reproduced as of October 31, and pricing is inconsistent across sources: Particle's launch post said $0.30/$1.20 and OpenRouter shows $0.05/$0.50, while its billing docs say $0.25/$1.00. At $0.25 in / $1 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

Gemini 3.7 Flash and Particle-1 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. Particle-1 costs less per token; and each leads in its own area — Gemini 3.7 Flash for strong intelligence-per-dollar - artificial analysis intelligence index 56 at introductory $0.75/$3.75 pricing, Particle-1 for token-efficient coding model, post-trained with reinforcement learning on deepseek v4.1 flash. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.

Want both Gemini 3.7 Flash and Particle-1 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Particle-1 better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Gemini 3.7 Flash leans toward strong intelligence-per-dollar - artificial analysis intelligence index 56 at introductory $0.75/$3.75 pricing while Particle-1 leans toward token-efficient coding model, post-trained with reinforcement learning on deepseek v4.1 flash, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Particle-1?

Particle-1 is cheaper — $0.75/$3.75 per 1M tokens vs $0.25/$1 per 1M tokens, roughly 3× apart on input.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both advertise 1M (~1,573 pages). Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.

Can I use both Gemini 3.7 Flash and Particle-1 together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Gemini 3.7 Flash, Particle-1 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Particle-1?

Particle-1 — released October 28, 2026, about 3 months after Gemini 3.7 Flash.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.