DeepSeek V4 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super

DeepSeek · China  |  NVIDIA · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick DeepSeek V4 for near-frontier coding at ~1/12 the cost or open mit-licensed weights you can self-host. Pick NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super for high-throughput agentic reasoning (up to 2.2x gpt-oss-120b) or 1m-token context with strong long-context retrieval (91.6% ruler @ 1m). On a tight budget at scale, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super is the value pick.

DeepSeek V4 (DeepSeek, China) and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (NVIDIA, US) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. DeepSeek V4 is china's open-weight price earthquake — near-frontier capability at roughly a twelfth of GPT-5.5's cost. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super is nVIDIA's open 120B-total/12B-active hybrid Mamba-Transformer MoE built for high-throughput agentic reasoning at 1M-token context. They diverge most on price and coding benchmarks — each quantified below from the models' real specs.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecDeepSeek V4NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
ProviderDeepSeek (China) NVIDIA (US)
ReleasedApril 24, 2026 March 11, 2026
Context window1M (~1,500 pages) 1M (~1,500 pages)
Price (in/out)$0.435/$0.87 per 1M tokens Open weight (self-host / free)
Open weight?Yes — self-hostable Yes — self-hostable
Modalitiestext, code text, code
SWE-Bench Verified80.6% 60.47%
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Near-frontier coding at ~1/12 the cost

DeepSeek V4

A core design strength of DeepSeek V4.

Open MIT-licensed weights you can self-host

DeepSeek V4

A core design strength of DeepSeek V4.

No long-context surcharge

DeepSeek V4

A core design strength of DeepSeek V4.

High-throughput agentic reasoning (up to 2.2x GPT-OSS-120B)

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super

A core design strength of NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super.

1M-token context with strong long-context retrieval (91.6% RULER @ 1M)

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super

A core design strength of NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super.

Strong math reasoning (90.21% AIME 2025)

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super

A core design strength of NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super.

Lowest cost at scale

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super

At Open weight (self-host / free), it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super

At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts DeepSeek V4, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Anyone whose priority is near-frontier coding at ~1/12 the cost

DeepSeek V4

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is high-throughput agentic reasoning (up to 2.2x gpt-oss-120b)

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super

That is its strongest area.

An enterprise with regional data-residency rules

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super or DeepSeek V4

Origin (China vs US) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.

DeepSeek V4: where it fits

China's open-weight price earthquake — near-frontier capability at roughly a twelfth of GPT-5.5's cost. Released April 24, 2026 by DeepSeek, it is built for near-frontier coding at ~1/12 the cost, open MIT-licensed weights you can self-host, no long-context surcharge, and highest LiveCodeBench result.

Its trade-offs are real: trails the very best on hardest agentic coding, and text/code focused, less multimodal. At $0.435 in / $0.87 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super: where it fits

NVIDIA's open 120B-total/12B-active hybrid Mamba-Transformer MoE built for high-throughput agentic reasoning at 1M-token context. Released March 11, 2026 by NVIDIA, it is built for high-throughput agentic reasoning (up to 2.2x GPT-OSS-120B), 1M-token context with strong long-context retrieval (91.6% RULER @ 1M), strong math reasoning (90.21% AIME 2025), and fully open weights, datasets, and recipes for self-hosting.

Its trade-offs: text-only; no image, audio, or video input, and requires roughly 8x H100-80GB GPUs to self-host at BF16. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.

The bottom line for this matchup

This is less "which is smarter" and more "which ecosystem fits." DeepSeek V4 (China) and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (US) differ on pricing philosophy, data-residency, and tooling as much as on raw scores. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super is the cheaper option, which matters at volume. The pragmatic move is to run one real task through both and judge the outputs against your own constraints — including where your data is allowed to be processed.

Want both DeepSeek V4 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?

On SWE-Bench Verified, DeepSeek V4 scores 80.6% and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super scores 60.47% — DeepSeek V4 has the measurable edge.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super?

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper — $0.435/$0.87 per 1M tokens vs Open weight (self-host / free).

Which has the bigger context window?

Both advertise 1M (~1,500 pages). Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.

Can I use both DeepSeek V4 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you DeepSeek V4, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, DeepSeek V4 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super?

DeepSeek V4 — released April 24, 2026, about 44 days after NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.