Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-5.3-Codex
Anthropic · US | OpenAI · US · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 for terminal-bench 4.0 agentic coding jumps to 70.6%, up from claude sonnet 5's 10.3% or same $2/$10 per million token pricing as sonnet 5, with cache-read price cut 50% to $0.10/mtok as of october 7, 2026. Pick GPT-5.3-Codex for dedicated coding agent or cli and ide integration. On a tight budget at scale, GPT-5.3-Codex is the value pick.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.3-Codex (OpenAI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is anthropic's September 28, 2026 mid-tier update — same $2/$10 pricing as Sonnet 5 but a large agentic-coding jump (Terminal-Bench 4.0: 70.6% vs 10.3%). GPT-5.3-Codex is openAI's coding-specialized agent model for autonomous software engineering. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
- ▸Price: nearly identical — $2/$10 per 1M tokens vs $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens. Cost will not be the deciding factor here.
- ▸Context window: Claude Sonnet 5.5 holds 2.5× more — 1M tokens (~1,500 pages) vs 400K (~600 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
- ▸Recency: Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the newer model by about 8 months (released September 28, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-5.3-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic (US) | OpenAI (US) |
| Released | September 28, 2026 | February 5, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M tokens (~1,500 pages) | 400K (~600 pages) |
| Price (in/out) | $2/$10 per 1M tokens | $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens |
| Open weight? | No — API only | No — API only |
| Modalities | text, image, code | text, code |
| SWE-Bench Verified | Not published | Not published |
| MRCR v2 @ 1M | Not published | Not published |
Who wins what
Terminal-Bench 4.0 agentic coding jumps to 70.6%, up from Claude Sonnet 5's 10.3%
Claude Sonnet 5.5
GPT-5.3-Codex is comparatively weak here — coding-specialized, narrower general use
Same $2/$10 per million token pricing as Sonnet 5, with cache-read price cut 50% to $0.10/MTok as of October 7, 2026
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Its 1M tokens window holds about 2.5× more than GPT-5.3-Codex's 400K in a single prompt.
Scores close to Opus 5.5 on several benchmarks (e.g. GDPval-AA v2.1 knowledge-work Elo) at a fraction of the cost
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic's September 28, 2026 mid-tier update — same $2/$10 pricing as Sonnet 5 but a large agentic-coding jump (Terminal-Bench 4.0: 70.6% vs 10.3%) — and it carries the larger 1M tokens context.
Dedicated coding agent
GPT-5.3-Codex
OpenAI's coding-specialized agent model for autonomous software engineering — and it runs cheaper at $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens.
CLI and IDE integration
GPT-5.3-Codex
GPT-5.3-Codex lists cLI and IDE integration among its strengths; Claude Sonnet 5.5 does not.
Autonomous software tasks
GPT-5.3-Codex
GPT-5.3-Codex lists autonomous software tasks among its strengths; Claude Sonnet 5.5 does not.
Lowest cost at scale
GPT-5.3-Codex
At $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Largest single-prompt input
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Its 1M tokens window is about 2.5× larger than GPT-5.3-Codex's 400K, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ GPT-5.3-Codex
At $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens it undercuts Claude Sonnet 5.5, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ Claude Sonnet 5.5
Larger 1M tokens window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is terminal-bench 4.0 agentic coding jumps to 70.6%, up from claude sonnet 5's 10.3%
→ Claude Sonnet 5.5
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is dedicated coding agent
→ GPT-5.3-Codex
That is its strongest area.
Claude Sonnet 5.5: where it fits
Anthropic's September 28, 2026 mid-tier update — same $2/$10 pricing as Sonnet 5 but a large agentic-coding jump (Terminal-Bench 4.0: 70.6% vs 10.3%). Released September 28, 2026 by Anthropic, it is built for terminal-Bench 4.0 agentic coding jumps to 70.6%, up from Claude Sonnet 5's 10.3%, same $2/$10 per million token pricing as Sonnet 5, with cache-read price cut 50% to $0.10/MTok as of October 7, 2026, scores close to Opus 5.5 on several benchmarks (e.g. GDPval-AA v2.1 knowledge-work Elo) at a fraction of the cost, and anthropic highlights stronger document/slide generation, spreadsheet work, and visual chart recognition (Chartography: 61.6%).
Its trade-offs are real: anthropic is explicit that Opus 5.5 'remains clearly stronger' on complex, open-ended work requiring sustained judgment, 1M-token context isn't uniformly available across every platform/plan, consistent with the rest of the 5.5 family, and mid-tier update released a week after Opus 5.5 (Sept 22) — Haiku 5.5 followed Oct 7 to complete the family. At $2 in / $10 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
GPT-5.3-Codex: where it fits
OpenAI's coding-specialized agent model for autonomous software engineering. Released February 5, 2026 by OpenAI, it is built for dedicated coding agent, cLI and IDE integration, autonomous software tasks, and tool calling.
Its trade-offs: coding-specialized, narrower general use, and retired in favor of GPT-5.5 Codex. At $1.75 in / $14 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-5.3-Codex overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. GPT-5.3-Codex costs less per token; Claude Sonnet 5.5 holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Claude Sonnet 5.5 for terminal-bench 4.0 agentic coding jumps to 70.6%, up from claude sonnet 5's 10.3%, GPT-5.3-Codex for dedicated coding agent. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Want both Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-5.3-Codex without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
See pricingFrequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-5.3-Codex better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Claude Sonnet 5.5 leans toward terminal-bench 4.0 agentic coding jumps to 70.6%, up from claude sonnet 5's 10.3% while GPT-5.3-Codex leans toward dedicated coding agent, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-5.3-Codex?
GPT-5.3-Codex is cheaper — $2/$10 per 1M tokens vs $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens, roughly 1.1× apart on input.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 — 1M tokens vs 400K, about 2.5× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-5.3-Codex together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Claude Sonnet 5.5, GPT-5.3-Codex and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-5.3-Codex?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 — released September 28, 2026, about 8 months after GPT-5.3-Codex.
Related comparisons
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.