NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Reflection Beam 1.0

NVIDIA · US  |  Reflection AI · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra for the most capable open-weight model from a us lab (artificial analysis intelligence index of about 48) or fast, efficient long-horizon agentic reasoning via a hybrid mamba-transformer design. Pick Reflection Beam 1.0 for 501b-parameter sparse moe (about 23b active per token) with weights on hugging face under apache 2.0 or reflection claims 3-4x less inference compute than rival models (vendor claim).

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra (NVIDIA) and Reflection Beam 1.0 (Reflection AI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is nVIDIA's open-weight reasoning flagship (about 550B total, 55B active) — the most capable open model from a US lab, built for long-running agents. Reflection Beam 1.0 is reflection AI's first open-weight model - a 501B Apache 2.0 MoE announced October 5 with weights published October 16, 2026, pitched as a US alternative to Chinese open models. The breakdown below works through their capabilities and ideal use cases so you can match one to your task.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecNVIDIA Nemotron 3 UltraReflection Beam 1.0
ProviderNVIDIA (US) Reflection AI (US)
ReleasedJune 4, 2026 October 16, 2026
Context window1M (~1,500 pages) 1M tokens (~1,500 pages)
Price (in/out)Open weight (self-host / free) Open weight (self-host / free)
Open weight?Yes — self-hostable Yes — self-hostable
Modalitiestext, code text, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

The most capable open-weight model from a US lab (Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index of about 48)

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra

Reflection Beam 1.0 is comparatively weak here — artificial Analysis Intelligence Index of 30, well below DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GLM-5.3 (45)

Fast, efficient long-horizon agentic reasoning via a hybrid Mamba-Transformer design

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra

Reflection Beam 1.0 is comparatively weak here — text-only input; some users report reasoning loops on long agent runs

A fully open release — weights, training data, and recipes under a permissive license

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra lists a fully open release — weights, training data, and recipes under a permissive license among its strengths; Reflection Beam 1.0 does not.

501B-parameter sparse MoE (about 23B active per token) with weights on Hugging Face under Apache 2.0

Reflection Beam 1.0

Reflection AI's first open-weight model - a 501B Apache 2.0 MoE announced October 5 with weights published October 16, 2026, pitched as a US alternative to Chinese open models — and it is the newer of the two.

Reflection claims 3-4x less inference compute than rival models (vendor claim)

Reflection Beam 1.0

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is comparatively weak here — trails the best Chinese open models on overall intelligence

Fast and cheap to run: Artificial Analysis measured about 385 output tokens/sec and $0.12 per index task

Reflection Beam 1.0

Reflection Beam 1.0 lists fast and cheap to run: Artificial Analysis measured about 385 output tokens/sec and $0.12 per index task among its strengths; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra does not.

Which should you pick?

Anyone whose priority is the most capable open-weight model from a us lab (artificial analysis intelligence index of about 48)

→ NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is 501b-parameter sparse moe (about 23b active per token) with weights on hugging face under apache 2.0

→ Reflection Beam 1.0

That is its strongest area.

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra: where it fits

NVIDIA's open-weight reasoning flagship (about 550B total, 55B active) — the most capable open model from a US lab, built for long-running agents. Released June 4, 2026 by NVIDIA, it is built for the most capable open-weight model from a US lab (Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index of about 48), fast, efficient long-horizon agentic reasoning via a hybrid Mamba-Transformer design, a fully open release — weights, training data, and recipes under a permissive license, and strong coding for an open model (SWE-Bench Verified in the high 60s).

Its trade-offs are real: trails the best Chinese open models on overall intelligence, and a 550B mixture-of-experts is heavy to self-host, and the 1M context is rarely served in full. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.

Reflection Beam 1.0: where it fits

Reflection AI's first open-weight model - a 501B Apache 2.0 MoE announced October 5 with weights published October 16, 2026, pitched as a US alternative to Chinese open models. Released October 16, 2026 by Reflection AI, it is built for 501B-parameter sparse MoE (about 23B active per token) with weights on Hugging Face under Apache 2.0, reflection claims 3-4x less inference compute than rival models (vendor claim), fast and cheap to run: Artificial Analysis measured about 385 output tokens/sec and $0.12 per index task, and third-party hosts list it from $0.25/$1.00 per million tokens (Nebius, as of Oct 27); Reflection's own API is in free beta.

Its trade-offs: artificial Analysis Intelligence Index of 30, well below DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GLM-5.3 (45), text-only input; some users report reasoning loops on long agent runs, self-hosting needs about 353 GB of GPU memory even at NVFP4, and kernels are CUDA-only for now, and headline benchmarks come from Reflection's own model card; independent evaluation was limited at launch. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.

The bottom line for this matchup

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra and Reflection Beam 1.0 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. and each leads in its own area — NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra for the most capable open-weight model from a us lab (artificial analysis intelligence index of about 48), Reflection Beam 1.0 for 501b-parameter sparse moe (about 23b active per token) with weights on hugging face under apache 2.0. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.

Want both NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra and Reflection Beam 1.0 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra or Reflection Beam 1.0 better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra leans toward the most capable open-weight model from a us lab (artificial analysis intelligence index of about 48) while Reflection Beam 1.0 leans toward 501b-parameter sparse moe (about 23b active per token) with weights on hugging face under apache 2.0, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra or Reflection Beam 1.0?

They are priced almost identically, so cost will not decide between them.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both advertise 1M (~1,500 pages). Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.

Can I use both NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra and Reflection Beam 1.0 together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra, Reflection Beam 1.0 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra or Reflection Beam 1.0?

Reflection Beam 1.0 — released October 16, 2026, about 4 months after NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.