Pick NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super for high-throughput agentic reasoning (up to 2.2x gpt-oss-120b) or 1m-token context with strong long-context retrieval (91.6% ruler @ 1m). Pick Step 3.7 Flash for a 198b-parameter sparse moe vision-language model (11b active) built specifically for agentic coding and search workflows or scmp reported it 'outshines larger rivals' from deepseek and moonshot on some benchmarks despite its smaller active size. On a tight budget at scale, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super is the value pick.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (NVIDIA, US) and Step 3.7 Flash (StepFun, China) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super is nVIDIA's open 120B-total/12B-active hybrid Mamba-Transformer MoE built for high-throughput agentic reasoning at 1M-token context. Step 3.7 Flash is stepFun's 198B MoE vision-language model built for coding and search agents - a distinct Chinese lab with genuinely competitive open weights. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences
Context window: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super holds 3.8× more — 1M (~1,500 pages) vs 256K (~393 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
Recency: Step 3.7 Flash is the newer model by about 3 months (released May 29, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Ecosystem: this is a US-vs-China matchup — they differ in pricing philosophy, data-residency options, and tooling ecosystems, not only benchmarks.
Specifications
Spec
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
Step 3.7 Flash
Provider
NVIDIA (US)
StepFun (China)
Released
March 11, 2026
May 29, 2026
Context window
1M (~1,500 pages)
256K (~393 pages)
Price (in/out)
Open weight (self-host / free)
$0.2/$1.15 per 1M tokens
Open weight?
Yes — self-hostable
Yes — self-hostable
Modalities
text, code
text, image, code
SWE-Bench Verified
60.47%
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
High-throughput agentic reasoning (up to 2.2x GPT-OSS-120B): NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super — NVIDIA's open 120B-total/12B-active hybrid Mamba-Transformer MoE built for high-throughput agentic reasoning at 1M-token context — and it carries the larger 1M context.
1M-token context with strong long-context retrieval (91.6% RULER @ 1M): NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super — Its 1M window holds about 3.8× more than Step 3.7 Flash's 256K in a single prompt.
Strong math reasoning (90.21% AIME 2025): NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super — NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super lists strong math reasoning (90.21% AIME 2025) among its strengths; Step 3.7 Flash does not.
A 198B-parameter sparse MoE vision-language model (11B active) built specifically for agentic coding and search workflows: Step 3.7 Flash — StepFun's 198B MoE vision-language model built for coding and search agents - a distinct Chinese lab with genuinely competitive open weights — and it is the newer of the two.
SCMP reported it 'outshines larger rivals' from DeepSeek and Moonshot on some benchmarks despite its smaller active size: Step 3.7 Flash — Step 3.7 Flash lists sCMP reported it 'outshines larger rivals' from DeepSeek and Moonshot on some benchmarks despite its smaller active size among its strengths; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super does not.
Open weights (Apache 2.0) at a low per-token price: Step 3.7 Flash — Step 3.7 Flash lists open weights (Apache 2.0) at a low per-token price among its strengths; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super does not.
Lowest cost at scale: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super — Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of Step 3.7 Flash's $0.2/$1.15 per 1M tokens.
Largest single-prompt input: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super — Its 1M window is about 3.8× larger than Step 3.7 Flash's 256K, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super — At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts Step 3.7 Flash, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super — Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is high-throughput agentic reasoning (up to 2.2x gpt-oss-120b): NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super — It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is a 198b-parameter sparse moe vision-language model (11b active) built specifically for agentic coding and search workflows: Step 3.7 Flash — That is its strongest area.
An enterprise with regional data-residency rules: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super or Step 3.7 Flash — Origin (US vs China) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super: where it fits
NVIDIA's open 120B-total/12B-active hybrid Mamba-Transformer MoE built for high-throughput agentic reasoning at 1M-token context. Released March 11, 2026 by NVIDIA, it is built for high-throughput agentic reasoning (up to 2.2x GPT-OSS-120B), 1M-token context with strong long-context retrieval (91.6% RULER @ 1M), strong math reasoning (90.21% AIME 2025), and fully open weights, datasets, and recipes for self-hosting.
Its trade-offs are real: text-only; no image, audio, or video input, and requires roughly 8x H100-80GB GPUs to self-host at BF16. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.
Step 3.7 Flash: where it fits
StepFun's 198B MoE vision-language model built for coding and search agents - a distinct Chinese lab with genuinely competitive open weights. Released May 29, 2026 by StepFun, it is built for a 198B-parameter sparse MoE vision-language model (11B active) built specifically for agentic coding and search workflows, sCMP reported it 'outshines larger rivals' from DeepSeek and Moonshot on some benchmarks despite its smaller active size, open weights (Apache 2.0) at a low per-token price, and includes a 1.8B vision encoder for image understanding alongside text.
Its trade-offs: stepFun is a newer, less established lab than DeepSeek, Alibaba, or Moonshot, benchmark 'outshines rivals' claims are from press coverage of specific tests, not a full independent leaderboard sweep, and smaller ecosystem and less third-party documentation than the more established Chinese labs. At $0.2 in / $1.15 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
This is less "which is smarter" and more "which ecosystem fits." NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (US) and Step 3.7 Flash (China) differ on pricing philosophy, data-residency, and tooling as much as on raw scores. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super is the cheaper option, which matters at volume. The pragmatic move is to run one real task through both and judge the outputs against your own constraints — including where your data is allowed to be processed.
Frequently asked questions
Is NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for Step 3.7 Flash, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super leans toward high-throughput agentic reasoning (up to 2.2x gpt-oss-120b) while Step 3.7 Flash leans toward a 198b-parameter sparse moe vision-language model (11b active) built specifically for agentic coding and search workflows, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super or Step 3.7 Flash?
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper — Open weight (self-host / free) vs $0.2/$1.15 per 1M tokens.
Which has the bigger context window?
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super — 1M vs 256K, about 3.8× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super and Step 3.7 Flash together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super, Step 3.7 Flash and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super or Step 3.7 Flash?
Step 3.7 Flash — released May 29, 2026, about 3 months after NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super vs Step 3.7 Flash
NVIDIA · US | StepFun · China · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super for high-throughput agentic reasoning (up to 2.2x gpt-oss-120b) or 1m-token context with strong long-context retrieval (91.6% ruler @ 1m). Pick Step 3.7 Flash for a 198b-parameter sparse moe vision-language model (11b active) built specifically for agentic coding and search workflows or scmp reported it 'outshines larger rivals' from deepseek and moonshot on some benchmarks despite its smaller active size. On a tight budget at scale, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super is the value pick.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (NVIDIA, US) and Step 3.7 Flash (StepFun, China) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super is nVIDIA's open 120B-total/12B-active hybrid Mamba-Transformer MoE built for high-throughput agentic reasoning at 1M-token context. Step 3.7 Flash is stepFun's 198B MoE vision-language model built for coding and search agents - a distinct Chinese lab with genuinely competitive open weights. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
▸Context window: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super holds 3.8× more — 1M (~1,500 pages) vs 256K (~393 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
▸Recency: Step 3.7 Flash is the newer model by about 3 months (released May 29, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
▸Ecosystem: this is a US-vs-China matchup — they differ in pricing philosophy, data-residency options, and tooling ecosystems, not only benchmarks.
Side-by-side specs
Spec
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
Step 3.7 Flash
Provider
NVIDIA (US)
StepFun (China)
Released
March 11, 2026
May 29, 2026
Context window
1M (~1,500 pages)
256K (~393 pages)
Price (in/out)
Open weight (self-host / free)
$0.2/$1.15 per 1M tokens
Open weight?
Yes — self-hostable
Yes — self-hostable
Modalities
text, code
text, image, code
SWE-Bench Verified
60.47%
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
High-throughput agentic reasoning (up to 2.2x GPT-OSS-120B)
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA's open 120B-total/12B-active hybrid Mamba-Transformer MoE built for high-throughput agentic reasoning at 1M-token context — and it carries the larger 1M context.
1M-token context with strong long-context retrieval (91.6% RULER @ 1M)
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
Its 1M window holds about 3.8× more than Step 3.7 Flash's 256K in a single prompt.
Strong math reasoning (90.21% AIME 2025)
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super lists strong math reasoning (90.21% AIME 2025) among its strengths; Step 3.7 Flash does not.
A 198B-parameter sparse MoE vision-language model (11B active) built specifically for agentic coding and search workflows
Step 3.7 Flash
StepFun's 198B MoE vision-language model built for coding and search agents - a distinct Chinese lab with genuinely competitive open weights — and it is the newer of the two.
SCMP reported it 'outshines larger rivals' from DeepSeek and Moonshot on some benchmarks despite its smaller active size
Step 3.7 Flash
Step 3.7 Flash lists sCMP reported it 'outshines larger rivals' from DeepSeek and Moonshot on some benchmarks despite its smaller active size among its strengths; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super does not.
Open weights (Apache 2.0) at a low per-token price
Step 3.7 Flash
Step 3.7 Flash lists open weights (Apache 2.0) at a low per-token price among its strengths; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super does not.
Lowest cost at scale
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of Step 3.7 Flash's $0.2/$1.15 per 1M tokens.
Largest single-prompt input
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
Its 1M window is about 3.8× larger than Step 3.7 Flash's 256K, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts Step 3.7 Flash, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is high-throughput agentic reasoning (up to 2.2x gpt-oss-120b)
→ NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is a 198b-parameter sparse moe vision-language model (11b active) built specifically for agentic coding and search workflows
→ Step 3.7 Flash
That is its strongest area.
An enterprise with regional data-residency rules
→ NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super or Step 3.7 Flash
Origin (US vs China) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super: where it fits
NVIDIA's open 120B-total/12B-active hybrid Mamba-Transformer MoE built for high-throughput agentic reasoning at 1M-token context. Released March 11, 2026 by NVIDIA, it is built for high-throughput agentic reasoning (up to 2.2x GPT-OSS-120B), 1M-token context with strong long-context retrieval (91.6% RULER @ 1M), strong math reasoning (90.21% AIME 2025), and fully open weights, datasets, and recipes for self-hosting.
Its trade-offs are real: text-only; no image, audio, or video input, and requires roughly 8x H100-80GB GPUs to self-host at BF16. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.
Step 3.7 Flash: where it fits
StepFun's 198B MoE vision-language model built for coding and search agents - a distinct Chinese lab with genuinely competitive open weights. Released May 29, 2026 by StepFun, it is built for a 198B-parameter sparse MoE vision-language model (11B active) built specifically for agentic coding and search workflows, sCMP reported it 'outshines larger rivals' from DeepSeek and Moonshot on some benchmarks despite its smaller active size, open weights (Apache 2.0) at a low per-token price, and includes a 1.8B vision encoder for image understanding alongside text.
Its trade-offs: stepFun is a newer, less established lab than DeepSeek, Alibaba, or Moonshot, benchmark 'outshines rivals' claims are from press coverage of specific tests, not a full independent leaderboard sweep, and smaller ecosystem and less third-party documentation than the more established Chinese labs. At $0.2 in / $1.15 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
This is less "which is smarter" and more "which ecosystem fits." NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (US) and Step 3.7 Flash (China) differ on pricing philosophy, data-residency, and tooling as much as on raw scores. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super is the cheaper option, which matters at volume. The pragmatic move is to run one real task through both and judge the outputs against your own constraints — including where your data is allowed to be processed.
Want both NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super and Step 3.7 Flash without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
Is NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for Step 3.7 Flash, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super leans toward high-throughput agentic reasoning (up to 2.2x gpt-oss-120b) while Step 3.7 Flash leans toward a 198b-parameter sparse moe vision-language model (11b active) built specifically for agentic coding and search workflows, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super or Step 3.7 Flash?
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper — Open weight (self-host / free) vs $0.2/$1.15 per 1M tokens.
Which has the bigger context window?
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super — 1M vs 256K, about 3.8× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super and Step 3.7 Flash together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super, Step 3.7 Flash and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super or Step 3.7 Flash?
Step 3.7 Flash — released May 29, 2026, about 3 months after NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super.
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.