Mistral Medium 3.5 vs North Mini Code

Mistral AI · France  |  Cohere · Global · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Mistral Medium 3.5 for strong intelligence-for-size — artificial analysis intelligence index 30, near the top of its price tier or 128b dense open-weight model — self-hostable. Pick North Mini Code for agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks or efficient sparse moe — 3b active of 30b, runs on a single h100. On a tight budget at scale, North Mini Code is the value pick.

Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI) and North Mini Code (Cohere) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Mistral Medium 3.5 is mistral's efficient 128B open-weight model — a single dense model unifying reasoning and coding that punches above its size on independent tests (AA Index 30). North Mini Code is cohere's first agentic coding model: an open-weight 30B/3B-active MoE built for real software-engineering and terminal tasks that runs on a single H100. Their biggest split is price, and the breakdown below shows exactly how that plays out for your workload.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecMistral Medium 3.5North Mini Code
ProviderMistral AI (France) Cohere (Global)
ReleasedApril 29, 2026 June 9, 2026
Context window256K (~384 pages) 256K (~384 pages)
Price (in/out)$1.5/$7.5 per 1M tokens Open weight (self-host / free)
Open weight?Yes — self-hostable Yes — self-hostable
Modalitiestext, image, code text, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published 67.6%
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Strong intelligence-for-size — Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 30, near the top of its price tier

Mistral Medium 3.5

North Mini Code is comparatively weak here — 256K context and modest general-intelligence index trail frontier models

128B dense open-weight model — self-hostable

Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5 lists 128B dense open-weight model — self-hostable among its strengths; North Mini Code does not.

Unifies reasoning and coding into one model with an adjustable reasoning effort

Mistral Medium 3.5

North Mini Code is comparatively weak here — text-only and coding-specialized — not multimodal or general-purpose

Agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks

North Mini Code

Cohere's first agentic coding model: an open-weight 30B/3B-active MoE built for real software-engineering and terminal tasks that runs on a single H100 — and it is the newer of the two.

Efficient sparse MoE — 3B active of 30B, runs on a single H100

North Mini Code

North Mini Code lists efficient sparse MoE — 3B active of 30B, runs on a single H100 among its strengths; Mistral Medium 3.5 does not.

High throughput (up to 2.8x Devstral Small 2) at low latency

North Mini Code

North Mini Code lists high throughput (up to 2.8x Devstral Small 2) at low latency among its strengths; Mistral Medium 3.5 does not.

Lowest cost at scale

North Mini Code

Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of Mistral Medium 3.5's $1.5/$7.5 per 1M tokens.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

North Mini Code

At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts Mistral Medium 3.5, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Anyone whose priority is strong intelligence-for-size — artificial analysis intelligence index 30, near the top of its price tier

Mistral Medium 3.5

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks

North Mini Code

That is its strongest area.

Mistral Medium 3.5: where it fits

Mistral's efficient 128B open-weight model — a single dense model unifying reasoning and coding that punches above its size on independent tests (AA Index 30). Released April 29, 2026 by Mistral AI, it is built for strong intelligence-for-size — Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 30, near the top of its price tier, 128B dense open-weight model — self-hostable, unifies reasoning and coding into one model with an adjustable reasoning effort, and 256K context with text and image input.

Its trade-offs are real: below the absolute frontier — a value/efficiency pick, not a flagship-beater, output pricing ($7.50/M) is higher than the cheapest Chinese rivals, license framing ('open' vs enterprise) varies across sources — confirm terms for commercial use, and no native video or audio. At $1.5 in / $7.5 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

North Mini Code: where it fits

Cohere's first agentic coding model: an open-weight 30B/3B-active MoE built for real software-engineering and terminal tasks that runs on a single H100. Released June 9, 2026 by Cohere, it is built for agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks, efficient sparse MoE — 3B active of 30B, runs on a single H100, high throughput (up to 2.8x Devstral Small 2) at low latency, and fully open weights under Apache 2.0 with fp8 and 4-bit builds.

Its trade-offs: text-only and coding-specialized — not multimodal or general-purpose, and 256K context and modest general-intelligence index trail frontier models. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.

The bottom line for this matchup

Mistral Medium 3.5 and North Mini Code overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. North Mini Code costs less per token; and each leads in its own area — Mistral Medium 3.5 for strong intelligence-for-size — artificial analysis intelligence index 30, near the top of its price tier, North Mini Code for agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.

Want both Mistral Medium 3.5 and North Mini Code without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or North Mini Code better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for Mistral Medium 3.5, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Mistral Medium 3.5 leans toward strong intelligence-for-size — artificial analysis intelligence index 30, near the top of its price tier while North Mini Code leans toward agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or North Mini Code?

North Mini Code is cheaper — $1.5/$7.5 per 1M tokens vs Open weight (self-host / free).

Which has the bigger context window?

Both advertise 256K (~384 pages). Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.

Can I use both Mistral Medium 3.5 and North Mini Code together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Mistral Medium 3.5, North Mini Code and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Mistral Medium 3.5 or North Mini Code?

North Mini Code — released June 9, 2026, about 41 days after Mistral Medium 3.5.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.