Llama 4 Scout vs Muse Wonder 1.0
Meta · US | Meta · US · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Both are Meta models. Muse Wonder 1.0 is the newer, generally stronger default; reach for Llama 4 Scout when its lower price or a specific cost or latency profile matters more than the latest capabilities.
Llama 4 Scout and Muse Wonder 1.0 are both Meta models, so the real question is not which lab to trust but which tier fits your workload and budget. Llama 4 Scout is the 10M-token open-weight giant — enormous on paper, but usable recall is far smaller. Muse Wonder 1.0 is meta Superintelligence Labs' October 12, 2026 debut frontier model — distinct from Muse Spark, scoring 52 on the independent Artificial Analysis Index with a 1M-token, four-modality context window. Since both come from the same lab, the comparison below focuses on the tier-and-cost trade-offs that actually separate them.
Key differences at a glance
- ▸Cost model: Llama 4 Scout ships open weights you can self-host (hardware cost only, no per-token fee), while Muse Wonder 1.0 is API-metered at $4/$20 per 1M tokens. Your choice depends on whether you want zero marginal cost at the price of running infrastructure.
- ▸Context window: Llama 4 Scout holds 9.5× more — 10M (~15,000 pages) vs 1M tokens (~1,573 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
- ▸Recency: Muse Wonder 1.0 is the newer model by about 19 months (released October 12, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Llama 4 Scout | Muse Wonder 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta (US) | Meta (US) |
| Released | April 2025 | October 12, 2026 |
| Context window | 10M (~15,000 pages) | 1M tokens (~1,573 pages) |
| Price (in/out) | Open weight (self-host / free) | $4/$20 per 1M tokens |
| Open weight? | Yes — self-hostable | No — API only |
| Modalities | text, image, code | text, image, video, audio |
| SWE-Bench Verified | Not published | Not published |
| MRCR v2 @ 1M | 15% | Not published |
Who wins what
Largest advertised context (10M)
Llama 4 Scout
Its 10M window holds about 9.5× more than Muse Wonder 1.0's 1M tokens in a single prompt.
Open weights, single-GPU friendly
Llama 4 Scout
Open weights make this possible at all — Muse Wonder 1.0 is API-only, so it cannot leave the vendor's servers.
Self-hosted, data-private deployment
Llama 4 Scout
The 10M-token open-weight giant — enormous on paper, but usable recall is far smaller — and it carries the larger 10M context.
Meta Superintelligence Labs' first frontier-class reasoning model — a new line distinct from the agentic-coding-focused Muse Spark family
Muse Wonder 1.0
Llama 4 Scout is comparatively weak here — ~15% on long-context multi-needle reasoning
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index score of 52 (a gated 'Wonder Full' subscription variant scores 56, tied with Claude Sonnet 5.5, behind only Opus 5.5 at 58)
Muse Wonder 1.0
Meta Superintelligence Labs' October 12, 2026 debut frontier model — distinct from Muse Spark, scoring 52 on the independent Artificial Analysis Index with a 1M-token, four-modality context window — and it is the newer of the two.
78.8% on DeepSWE v1.1 long-horizon coding, ahead of both Claude Opus 5.5 (74.2%) and GPT-6 Astra (74.1%)
Muse Wonder 1.0
Muse Wonder 1.0 lists 78.8% on DeepSWE v1.1 long-horizon coding, ahead of both Claude Opus 5.5 (74.2%) and GPT-6 Astra (74.1%) among its strengths; Llama 4 Scout does not.
Lowest cost at scale
Llama 4 Scout
Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of Muse Wonder 1.0's $4/$20 per 1M tokens.
Largest single-prompt input
Llama 4 Scout
Its 10M window is about 9.5× larger than Muse Wonder 1.0's 1M tokens, fitting roughly 15,000 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ Llama 4 Scout
At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts Muse Wonder 1.0, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ Llama 4 Scout
Larger 10M window fits more in one prompt.
A team with data-privacy or self-hosting needs
→ Llama 4 Scout
Open weights let you run it on your own hardware; Muse Wonder 1.0 is API-only.
Anyone whose priority is largest advertised context (10m)
→ Llama 4 Scout
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is meta superintelligence labs' first frontier-class reasoning model — a new line distinct from the agentic-coding-focused muse spark family
→ Muse Wonder 1.0
That is its strongest area.
Llama 4 Scout: where it fits
The 10M-token open-weight giant — enormous on paper, but usable recall is far smaller. Released April 2025 by Meta, it is built for largest advertised context (10M), open weights, single-GPU friendly, self-hosted, data-private deployment, and retrieval over very long inputs.
Its trade-offs are real: effective recall degrades far below 10M, and ~15% on long-context multi-needle reasoning. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.
Muse Wonder 1.0: where it fits
Meta Superintelligence Labs' October 12, 2026 debut frontier model — distinct from Muse Spark, scoring 52 on the independent Artificial Analysis Index with a 1M-token, four-modality context window. Released October 12, 2026 by Meta, it is built for meta Superintelligence Labs' first frontier-class reasoning model — a new line distinct from the agentic-coding-focused Muse Spark family, artificial Analysis Intelligence Index score of 52 (a gated 'Wonder Full' subscription variant scores 56, tied with Claude Sonnet 5.5, behind only Opus 5.5 at 58), 78.8% on DeepSWE v1.1 long-horizon coding, ahead of both Claude Opus 5.5 (74.2%) and GPT-6 Astra (74.1%), and accepts text, image, video, audio, and PDF input against a 1,048,576-token context window.
Its trade-offs: the stronger 'Wonder Full' variant is gated behind $50/$200-per-month Muse Code subscriptions, with no public API or independently verifiable pricing, meta's full safety report had not been published as of launch, first release in a brand-new model family — no track record yet next to Meta's more established Muse Spark line, and benchmark comparisons against Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra are Meta's own self-reported figures. At $4 in / $20 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
Because Llama 4 Scout and Muse Wonder 1.0 come from the same lab (Meta), they share the same training philosophy and ecosystem — the decision is purely tier vs. cost. Muse Wonder 1.0 is the more capable, more recent option; the other earns its place only when its price or latency profile fits a specific job better. Most teams should default to Muse Wonder 1.0 and drop down only with a concrete reason.
Want both Llama 4 Scout and Muse Wonder 1.0 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
See pricingFrequently asked questions
Is Llama 4 Scout or Muse Wonder 1.0 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Llama 4 Scout leans toward largest advertised context (10m) while Muse Wonder 1.0 leans toward meta superintelligence labs' first frontier-class reasoning model — a new line distinct from the agentic-coding-focused muse spark family, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Muse Wonder 1.0?
Llama 4 Scout is open-weight, so self-hosting means no per-token fee (you pay for hardware instead), while Muse Wonder 1.0 is API-metered at $4/$20 per 1M tokens. For most teams without GPUs, the API model is cheaper to start; at very high volume, self-hosting can win.
Which has the bigger context window?
Llama 4 Scout — 10M vs 1M tokens, about 9.5× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Should I upgrade from Llama 4 Scout to Muse Wonder 1.0?
Since both are Meta models, the newer one (Muse Wonder 1.0) is usually the better default unless you need a specific cost or latency profile from the other.
Which is newer, Llama 4 Scout or Muse Wonder 1.0?
Muse Wonder 1.0 — released October 12, 2026, about 19 months after Llama 4 Scout.
Related comparisons
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.