Llama 4 Maverick vs Reflection Beam 1.0
Meta · US | Reflection AI · US · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick Llama 4 Maverick for open weights, 1m context or strong image + text understanding. Pick Reflection Beam 1.0 for 501b-parameter sparse moe (about 23b active per token) with weights on hugging face under apache 2.0 or reflection claims 3-4x less inference compute than rival models (vendor claim).
Llama 4 Maverick (Meta) and Reflection Beam 1.0 (Reflection AI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Llama 4 Maverick is meta's open-weight 1M-context multimodal model for self-hosted deployments. Reflection Beam 1.0 is reflection AI's first open-weight model - a 501B Apache 2.0 MoE announced October 5 with weights published October 16, 2026, pitched as a US alternative to Chinese open models. The breakdown below works through their capabilities and ideal use cases so you can match one to your task.
Key differences at a glance
- ▸Context window: both advertise 1M (~1,500 pages). Tie on paper — test on your own long inputs, since usable recall varies by model.
- ▸Recency: Reflection Beam 1.0 is the newer model by about 19 months (released October 16, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Llama 4 Maverick | Reflection Beam 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta (US) | Reflection AI (US) |
| Released | April 2025 | October 16, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M (~1,500 pages) | 1M tokens (~1,500 pages) |
| Price (in/out) | Open weight (self-host / free) | Open weight (self-host / free) |
| Open weight? | Yes — self-hostable | Yes — self-hostable |
| Modalities | text, image, code | text, code |
| SWE-Bench Verified | Not published | Not published |
| MRCR v2 @ 1M | Not published | Not published |
Who wins what
Open weights, 1M context
Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Maverick lists open weights, 1M context among its strengths; Reflection Beam 1.0 does not.
Strong image + text understanding
Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Maverick lists strong image + text understanding among its strengths; Reflection Beam 1.0 does not.
Self-hostable
Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Maverick lists self-hostable among its strengths; Reflection Beam 1.0 does not.
501B-parameter sparse MoE (about 23B active per token) with weights on Hugging Face under Apache 2.0
Reflection Beam 1.0
Reflection AI's first open-weight model - a 501B Apache 2.0 MoE announced October 5 with weights published October 16, 2026, pitched as a US alternative to Chinese open models — and it is the newer of the two.
Reflection claims 3-4x less inference compute than rival models (vendor claim)
Reflection Beam 1.0
Reflection Beam 1.0 lists reflection claims 3-4x less inference compute than rival models (vendor claim) among its strengths; Llama 4 Maverick does not.
Fast and cheap to run: Artificial Analysis measured about 385 output tokens/sec and $0.12 per index task
Reflection Beam 1.0
Reflection Beam 1.0 lists fast and cheap to run: Artificial Analysis measured about 385 output tokens/sec and $0.12 per index task among its strengths; Llama 4 Maverick does not.
Which should you pick?
Anyone whose priority is open weights, 1m context
→ Llama 4 Maverick
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is 501b-parameter sparse moe (about 23b active per token) with weights on hugging face under apache 2.0
→ Reflection Beam 1.0
That is its strongest area.
Llama 4 Maverick: where it fits
Meta's open-weight 1M-context multimodal model for self-hosted deployments. Released April 2025 by Meta, it is built for open weights, 1M context, strong image + text understanding, self-hostable, and 400B MoE, 17B active.
Its trade-offs are real: needs serious hardware to self-host, and trails closed frontier on reasoning. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.
Reflection Beam 1.0: where it fits
Reflection AI's first open-weight model - a 501B Apache 2.0 MoE announced October 5 with weights published October 16, 2026, pitched as a US alternative to Chinese open models. Released October 16, 2026 by Reflection AI, it is built for 501B-parameter sparse MoE (about 23B active per token) with weights on Hugging Face under Apache 2.0, reflection claims 3-4x less inference compute than rival models (vendor claim), fast and cheap to run: Artificial Analysis measured about 385 output tokens/sec and $0.12 per index task, and third-party hosts list it from $0.25/$1.00 per million tokens (Nebius, as of Oct 27); Reflection's own API is in free beta.
Its trade-offs: artificial Analysis Intelligence Index of 30, well below DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GLM-5.3 (45), text-only input; some users report reasoning loops on long agent runs, self-hosting needs about 353 GB of GPU memory even at NVFP4, and kernels are CUDA-only for now, and headline benchmarks come from Reflection's own model card; independent evaluation was limited at launch. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.
The bottom line for this matchup
Llama 4 Maverick and Reflection Beam 1.0 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. and each leads in its own area — Llama 4 Maverick for open weights, 1m context, Reflection Beam 1.0 for 501b-parameter sparse moe (about 23b active per token) with weights on hugging face under apache 2.0. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Want both Llama 4 Maverick and Reflection Beam 1.0 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
See pricingFrequently asked questions
Is Llama 4 Maverick or Reflection Beam 1.0 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Llama 4 Maverick leans toward open weights, 1m context while Reflection Beam 1.0 leans toward 501b-parameter sparse moe (about 23b active per token) with weights on hugging face under apache 2.0, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Reflection Beam 1.0?
They are priced almost identically, so cost will not decide between them.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both advertise 1M (~1,500 pages). Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.
Can I use both Llama 4 Maverick and Reflection Beam 1.0 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Llama 4 Maverick, Reflection Beam 1.0 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Llama 4 Maverick or Reflection Beam 1.0?
Reflection Beam 1.0 — released October 16, 2026, about 19 months after Llama 4 Maverick.
Related comparisons
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.