Ling-2.6-1T vs Step 5 Preview

Ant Group · China  |  StepFun · China · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Ling-2.6-1T for a trillion-parameter moe (1t total / ~50-63b active) from ant group - the fintech giant behind alipay - entering ai at frontier scale or fully open weights under the permissive mit license, unusual for a model this large. Pick Step 5 Preview for sparse moe architecture — 600b total parameters, only 27b active per token — built for long-horizon agentic work across large codebases and documents or 1m-token context window (64k max output) at $1/$2.70 per million tokens, among the cheapest frontier-scale context windows available. Choose Ling-2.6-1T if you need self-hosting or data privacy; Step 5 Preview if you want a managed API.

Ling-2.6-1T (Ant Group) and Step 5 Preview (StepFun) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Ling-2.6-1T is ant Group's trillion-parameter, MIT-licensed open model - a fintech giant's frontier-scale entry into the Chinese open-weight AI race. Step 5 Preview is stepFun's September 20, 2026 flagship preview — a 600B-parameter sparse MoE model (27B active) with a 1M-token context window at $1/$2.70 per million tokens, open weights promised for mid-October. They diverge most on price, context window and open vs. closed weights — each quantified below from the models' real specs.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecLing-2.6-1TStep 5 Preview
ProviderAnt Group (China) StepFun (China)
ReleasedApril 2026 September 20, 2026
Context window256K (~393 pages) 1M tokens (~1,500 pages)
Price (in/out)$0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens $1/$2.7 per 1M tokens
Open weight?Yes — self-hostable No — API only
Modalitiestext, code text, image, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

A trillion-parameter MoE (1T total / ~50-63B active) from Ant Group - the fintech giant behind Alipay - entering AI at frontier scale

Ling-2.6-1T

At $0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens it undercuts Step 5 Preview ($1/$2.7 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.

Fully open weights under the permissive MIT license, unusual for a model this large

Ling-2.6-1T

Open weights make this possible at all — Step 5 Preview is API-only, so it cannot leave the vendor's servers.

A companion 'Ring' reasoning variant claims gold-medal-level IMO/CMO math scores using a hybrid linear-attention architecture

Ling-2.6-1T

Ant Group's trillion-parameter, MIT-licensed open model - a fintech giant's frontier-scale entry into the Chinese open-weight AI race — and it runs cheaper at $0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens.

Sparse MoE architecture — 600B total parameters, only 27B active per token — built for long-horizon agentic work across large codebases and documents

Step 5 Preview

Its 1M tokens window holds about 3.8× more than Ling-2.6-1T's 256K in a single prompt.

1M-token context window (64K max output) at $1/$2.70 per million tokens, among the cheapest frontier-scale context windows available

Step 5 Preview

StepFun's September 20, 2026 flagship preview — a 600B-parameter sparse MoE model (27B active) with a 1M-token context window at $1/$2.70 per million tokens, open weights promised for mid-October — and it carries the larger 1M tokens context.

67.7% on DeepSWE v1.1, ahead of open-weight rivals Kimi K3 (67.5%) and GLM-5.3 (66.9%)

Step 5 Preview

StepFun's September 20, 2026 flagship preview — a 600B-parameter sparse MoE model (27B active) with a 1M-token context window at $1/$2.70 per million tokens, open weights promised for mid-October — and it is the newer of the two.

Lowest cost at scale

Ling-2.6-1T

At $0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.

Largest single-prompt input

Step 5 Preview

Its 1M tokens window is about 3.8× larger than Ling-2.6-1T's 256K, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

→ Ling-2.6-1T

At $0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens it undercuts Step 5 Preview, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

→ Step 5 Preview

Larger 1M tokens window fits more in one prompt.

A team with data-privacy or self-hosting needs

→ Ling-2.6-1T

Open weights let you run it on your own hardware; Step 5 Preview is API-only.

Anyone whose priority is a trillion-parameter moe (1t total / ~50-63b active) from ant group - the fintech giant behind alipay - entering ai at frontier scale

→ Ling-2.6-1T

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is sparse moe architecture — 600b total parameters, only 27b active per token — built for long-horizon agentic work across large codebases and documents

→ Step 5 Preview

That is its strongest area.

Ling-2.6-1T: where it fits

Ant Group's trillion-parameter, MIT-licensed open model - a fintech giant's frontier-scale entry into the Chinese open-weight AI race. Released April 2026 by Ant Group, it is built for a trillion-parameter MoE (1T total / ~50-63B active) from Ant Group - the fintech giant behind Alipay - entering AI at frontier scale, fully open weights under the permissive MIT license, unusual for a model this large, a companion 'Ring' reasoning variant claims gold-medal-level IMO/CMO math scores using a hybrid linear-attention architecture, and a major Chinese lab with real financial backing, distinct from DeepSeek, Alibaba, or Moonshot.

Its trade-offs are real: pricing shown is third-party hosting, not an official Ant Group rate card, newer entrant to LLMs specifically - less track record than dedicated AI labs, and exact release date is disputed across sources (reports range from mid to late April 2026). At $0.3 in / $2.5 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

Step 5 Preview: where it fits

StepFun's September 20, 2026 flagship preview — a 600B-parameter sparse MoE model (27B active) with a 1M-token context window at $1/$2.70 per million tokens, open weights promised for mid-October. Released September 20, 2026 by StepFun, it is built for sparse MoE architecture — 600B total parameters, only 27B active per token — built for long-horizon agentic work across large codebases and documents, 1M-token context window (64K max output) at $1/$2.70 per million tokens, among the cheapest frontier-scale context windows available, 67.7% on DeepSWE v1.1, ahead of open-weight rivals Kimi K3 (67.5%) and GLM-5.3 (66.9%), and scores 44 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, ranking 27th of 653 models tracked.

Its trade-offs: trails closed frontier models on coding — 67.7% on DeepSWE v1.1 vs GPT-6 Astra's 74.1% and Claude Opus 5's 74.0%, open weights were promised for October 15, 2026 but hadn't shipped as of this writing — API-only for now despite the open-weight roadmap, a 'Preview' release, not StepFun's finished flagship — positioning and pricing may change once weights ship, and stepCodeBench and DeepSWE figures are StepFun's own reported numbers, not yet independently reproduced at scale. At $1 in / $2.7 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

The defining split here is open vs. closed. Ling-2.6-1T gives you weights you control — self-host it, fine-tune it, keep data in-house, pay only for hardware. Step 5 Preview gives you a managed, always-updated API with no infrastructure to run. Teams with GPUs, privacy requirements, or huge volume often favour the open model; teams that want zero ops and the latest capabilities favour the closed one. Capability is close enough that this operational question, not the benchmark, usually decides it.

Want both Ling-2.6-1T and Step 5 Preview without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Ling-2.6-1T or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Ling-2.6-1T leans toward a trillion-parameter moe (1t total / ~50-63b active) from ant group - the fintech giant behind alipay - entering ai at frontier scale while Step 5 Preview leans toward sparse moe architecture — 600b total parameters, only 27b active per token — built for long-horizon agentic work across large codebases and documents, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Ling-2.6-1T or Step 5 Preview?

Ling-2.6-1T is open-weight, so self-hosting means no per-token fee (you pay for hardware instead), while Step 5 Preview is API-metered at $1/$2.7 per 1M tokens. For most teams without GPUs, the API model is cheaper to start; at very high volume, self-hosting can win.

Which has the bigger context window?

Step 5 Preview — 1M tokens vs 256K, about 3.8× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.

Can I use both Ling-2.6-1T and Step 5 Preview together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Ling-2.6-1T, Step 5 Preview and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Ling-2.6-1T or Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview — released September 20, 2026, about 6 months after Ling-2.6-1T.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.