Pick Ling-2.6-1T for a trillion-parameter moe (1t total / ~50-63b active) from ant group - the fintech giant behind alipay - entering ai at frontier scale or fully open weights under the permissive mit license, unusual for a model this large. Pick MiniMax M3 for open-weight 428b moe (~23b active per token) with a 1m-token context or native multimodal input — text, image and video. On a tight budget at scale, MiniMax M3 is the value pick.
Ling-2.6-1T (Ant Group) and MiniMax M3 (MiniMax) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Ling-2.6-1T is ant Group's trillion-parameter, MIT-licensed open model - a fintech giant's frontier-scale entry into the Chinese open-weight AI race. MiniMax M3 is miniMax's open-weight 428B multimodal model with a 1M context — strong reported coding (59.0 SWE-Bench Pro) at low entry pricing. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences
Price: MiniMax M3 is about 1.3× cheaper on input ($0.23/$0.96 per 1M tokens vs $0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens) — modest, but it adds up at steady volume.
Context window: MiniMax M3 holds 4× more — 1M (~1,573 pages) vs 256K (~393 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
Recency: MiniMax M3 is the newer model by about 2 months (released May 31, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Specifications
Spec
Ling-2.6-1T
MiniMax M3
Provider
Ant Group (China)
MiniMax (China)
Released
April 2026
May 31, 2026
Context window
256K (~393 pages)
1M (~1,573 pages)
Price (in/out)
$0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens
$0.23/$0.96 per 1M tokens
Open weight?
Yes — self-hostable
Yes — self-hostable
Modalities
text, code
text, image, video, code
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
A trillion-parameter MoE (1T total / ~50-63B active) from Ant Group - the fintech giant behind Alipay - entering AI at frontier scale: Ling-2.6-1T — Ling-2.6-1T lists a trillion-parameter MoE (1T total / ~50-63B active) from Ant Group - the fintech giant behind Alipay - entering AI at frontier scale among its strengths; MiniMax M3 does not.
Fully open weights under the permissive MIT license, unusual for a model this large: Ling-2.6-1T — Ling-2.6-1T lists fully open weights under the permissive MIT license, unusual for a model this large among its strengths; MiniMax M3 does not.
A companion 'Ring' reasoning variant claims gold-medal-level IMO/CMO math scores using a hybrid linear-attention architecture: Ling-2.6-1T — Ling-2.6-1T lists a companion 'Ring' reasoning variant claims gold-medal-level IMO/CMO math scores using a hybrid linear-attention architecture among its strengths; MiniMax M3 does not.
Open-weight 428B MoE (~23B active per token) with a 1M-token context: MiniMax M3 — Its 1M window holds about 4× more than Ling-2.6-1T's 256K in a single prompt.
Native multimodal input — text, image and video: MiniMax M3 — MiniMax's open-weight 428B multimodal model with a 1M context — strong reported coding (59.0 SWE-Bench Pro) at low entry pricing — and it runs cheaper at $0.23/$0.96 per 1M tokens.
Reports 59.0 on SWE-Bench Pro (a strong open-weight score), surpassing GPT-5.5: MiniMax M3 — Ling-2.6-1T is comparatively weak here — exact release date is disputed across sources (reports range from mid to late April 2026)
Lowest cost at scale: MiniMax M3 — At $0.23/$0.96 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Largest single-prompt input: MiniMax M3 — Its 1M window is about 4× larger than Ling-2.6-1T's 256K, fitting roughly 1,573 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume: MiniMax M3 — At $0.23/$0.96 per 1M tokens it undercuts Ling-2.6-1T, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases: MiniMax M3 — Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is a trillion-parameter moe (1t total / ~50-63b active) from ant group - the fintech giant behind alipay - entering ai at frontier scale: Ling-2.6-1T — It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is open-weight 428b moe (~23b active per token) with a 1m-token context: MiniMax M3 — That is its strongest area.
Ling-2.6-1T: where it fits
Ant Group's trillion-parameter, MIT-licensed open model - a fintech giant's frontier-scale entry into the Chinese open-weight AI race. Released April 2026 by Ant Group, it is built for a trillion-parameter MoE (1T total / ~50-63B active) from Ant Group - the fintech giant behind Alipay - entering AI at frontier scale, fully open weights under the permissive MIT license, unusual for a model this large, a companion 'Ring' reasoning variant claims gold-medal-level IMO/CMO math scores using a hybrid linear-attention architecture, and a major Chinese lab with real financial backing, distinct from DeepSeek, Alibaba, or Moonshot.
Its trade-offs are real: pricing shown is third-party hosting, not an official Ant Group rate card, newer entrant to LLMs specifically - less track record than dedicated AI labs, and exact release date is disputed across sources (reports range from mid to late April 2026). At $0.3 in / $2.5 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
MiniMax M3: where it fits
MiniMax's open-weight 428B multimodal model with a 1M context — strong reported coding (59.0 SWE-Bench Pro) at low entry pricing. Released May 31, 2026 by MiniMax, it is built for open-weight 428B MoE (~23B active per token) with a 1M-token context, native multimodal input — text, image and video, reports 59.0 on SWE-Bench Pro (a strong open-weight score), surpassing GPT-5.5, and low entry pricing at $0.30/$1.20 per million up to 512K tokens.
Its trade-offs: price doubles to $0.60/$2.40 above 512K tokens — not flat across 1M, miniMax's own reported 80.5 SWE-Bench Verified figure is vendor-stated, not independently verified, sWE-Bench Pro is a different, harder benchmark than SWE-Bench Verified, and newer than M2.7 but with less independent testing so far. At $0.23 in / $0.96 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
Ling-2.6-1T and MiniMax M3 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. MiniMax M3 costs less per token; MiniMax M3 holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Ling-2.6-1T for a trillion-parameter moe (1t total / ~50-63b active) from ant group - the fintech giant behind alipay - entering ai at frontier scale, MiniMax M3 for open-weight 428b moe (~23b active per token) with a 1m-token context. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ling-2.6-1T or MiniMax M3 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Ling-2.6-1T leans toward a trillion-parameter moe (1t total / ~50-63b active) from ant group - the fintech giant behind alipay - entering ai at frontier scale while MiniMax M3 leans toward open-weight 428b moe (~23b active per token) with a 1m-token context, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Ling-2.6-1T or MiniMax M3?
MiniMax M3 is cheaper — $0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens vs $0.23/$0.96 per 1M tokens, roughly 1.3× apart on input.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiniMax M3 — 1M vs 256K, about 4× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Ling-2.6-1T and MiniMax M3 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Ling-2.6-1T, MiniMax M3 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Ling-2.6-1T or MiniMax M3?
MiniMax M3 — released May 31, 2026, about 2 months after Ling-2.6-1T.
Ling-2.6-1T vs MiniMax M3
Ant Group · China | MiniMax · China · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick Ling-2.6-1T for a trillion-parameter moe (1t total / ~50-63b active) from ant group - the fintech giant behind alipay - entering ai at frontier scale or fully open weights under the permissive mit license, unusual for a model this large. Pick MiniMax M3 for open-weight 428b moe (~23b active per token) with a 1m-token context or native multimodal input — text, image and video. On a tight budget at scale, MiniMax M3 is the value pick.
Ling-2.6-1T (Ant Group) and MiniMax M3 (MiniMax) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Ling-2.6-1T is ant Group's trillion-parameter, MIT-licensed open model - a fintech giant's frontier-scale entry into the Chinese open-weight AI race. MiniMax M3 is miniMax's open-weight 428B multimodal model with a 1M context — strong reported coding (59.0 SWE-Bench Pro) at low entry pricing. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
▸Price: MiniMax M3 is about 1.3× cheaper on input ($0.23/$0.96 per 1M tokens vs $0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens) — modest, but it adds up at steady volume.
▸Context window: MiniMax M3 holds 4× more — 1M (~1,573 pages) vs 256K (~393 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
▸Recency: MiniMax M3 is the newer model by about 2 months (released May 31, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
Spec
Ling-2.6-1T
MiniMax M3
Provider
Ant Group (China)
MiniMax (China)
Released
April 2026
May 31, 2026
Context window
256K (~393 pages)
1M (~1,573 pages)
Price (in/out)
$0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens
$0.23/$0.96 per 1M tokens
Open weight?
Yes — self-hostable
Yes — self-hostable
Modalities
text, code
text, image, video, code
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
A trillion-parameter MoE (1T total / ~50-63B active) from Ant Group - the fintech giant behind Alipay - entering AI at frontier scale
Ling-2.6-1T
Ling-2.6-1T lists a trillion-parameter MoE (1T total / ~50-63B active) from Ant Group - the fintech giant behind Alipay - entering AI at frontier scale among its strengths; MiniMax M3 does not.
Fully open weights under the permissive MIT license, unusual for a model this large
Ling-2.6-1T
Ling-2.6-1T lists fully open weights under the permissive MIT license, unusual for a model this large among its strengths; MiniMax M3 does not.
A companion 'Ring' reasoning variant claims gold-medal-level IMO/CMO math scores using a hybrid linear-attention architecture
Ling-2.6-1T
Ling-2.6-1T lists a companion 'Ring' reasoning variant claims gold-medal-level IMO/CMO math scores using a hybrid linear-attention architecture among its strengths; MiniMax M3 does not.
Open-weight 428B MoE (~23B active per token) with a 1M-token context
MiniMax M3
Its 1M window holds about 4× more than Ling-2.6-1T's 256K in a single prompt.
Native multimodal input — text, image and video
MiniMax M3
MiniMax's open-weight 428B multimodal model with a 1M context — strong reported coding (59.0 SWE-Bench Pro) at low entry pricing — and it runs cheaper at $0.23/$0.96 per 1M tokens.
Reports 59.0 on SWE-Bench Pro (a strong open-weight score), surpassing GPT-5.5
MiniMax M3
Ling-2.6-1T is comparatively weak here — exact release date is disputed across sources (reports range from mid to late April 2026)
Lowest cost at scale
MiniMax M3
At $0.23/$0.96 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Largest single-prompt input
MiniMax M3
Its 1M window is about 4× larger than Ling-2.6-1T's 256K, fitting roughly 1,573 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ MiniMax M3
At $0.23/$0.96 per 1M tokens it undercuts Ling-2.6-1T, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ MiniMax M3
Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is a trillion-parameter moe (1t total / ~50-63b active) from ant group - the fintech giant behind alipay - entering ai at frontier scale
→ Ling-2.6-1T
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is open-weight 428b moe (~23b active per token) with a 1m-token context
→ MiniMax M3
That is its strongest area.
Ling-2.6-1T: where it fits
Ant Group's trillion-parameter, MIT-licensed open model - a fintech giant's frontier-scale entry into the Chinese open-weight AI race. Released April 2026 by Ant Group, it is built for a trillion-parameter MoE (1T total / ~50-63B active) from Ant Group - the fintech giant behind Alipay - entering AI at frontier scale, fully open weights under the permissive MIT license, unusual for a model this large, a companion 'Ring' reasoning variant claims gold-medal-level IMO/CMO math scores using a hybrid linear-attention architecture, and a major Chinese lab with real financial backing, distinct from DeepSeek, Alibaba, or Moonshot.
Its trade-offs are real: pricing shown is third-party hosting, not an official Ant Group rate card, newer entrant to LLMs specifically - less track record than dedicated AI labs, and exact release date is disputed across sources (reports range from mid to late April 2026). At $0.3 in / $2.5 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
MiniMax M3: where it fits
MiniMax's open-weight 428B multimodal model with a 1M context — strong reported coding (59.0 SWE-Bench Pro) at low entry pricing. Released May 31, 2026 by MiniMax, it is built for open-weight 428B MoE (~23B active per token) with a 1M-token context, native multimodal input — text, image and video, reports 59.0 on SWE-Bench Pro (a strong open-weight score), surpassing GPT-5.5, and low entry pricing at $0.30/$1.20 per million up to 512K tokens.
Its trade-offs: price doubles to $0.60/$2.40 above 512K tokens — not flat across 1M, miniMax's own reported 80.5 SWE-Bench Verified figure is vendor-stated, not independently verified, sWE-Bench Pro is a different, harder benchmark than SWE-Bench Verified, and newer than M2.7 but with less independent testing so far. At $0.23 in / $0.96 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
Ling-2.6-1T and MiniMax M3 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. MiniMax M3 costs less per token; MiniMax M3 holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Ling-2.6-1T for a trillion-parameter moe (1t total / ~50-63b active) from ant group - the fintech giant behind alipay - entering ai at frontier scale, MiniMax M3 for open-weight 428b moe (~23b active per token) with a 1m-token context. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Want both Ling-2.6-1T and MiniMax M3 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Ling-2.6-1T leans toward a trillion-parameter moe (1t total / ~50-63b active) from ant group - the fintech giant behind alipay - entering ai at frontier scale while MiniMax M3 leans toward open-weight 428b moe (~23b active per token) with a 1m-token context, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Ling-2.6-1T or MiniMax M3?
MiniMax M3 is cheaper — $0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens vs $0.23/$0.96 per 1M tokens, roughly 1.3× apart on input.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiniMax M3 — 1M vs 256K, about 4× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Ling-2.6-1T and MiniMax M3 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Ling-2.6-1T, MiniMax M3 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Ling-2.6-1T or MiniMax M3?
MiniMax M3 — released May 31, 2026, about 2 months after Ling-2.6-1T.
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.