Hunyuan Hy4 Preview vs Muse Glimmer

Tencent · China  |  Meta · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Hunyuan Hy4 Preview for gpqa diamond (92.3) or terminal-bench (85.4). Pick Muse Glimmer for runs real agentic tasks locally on one consumer gpu - fits 24gb of vram in 4-bit or open weights (apache 2.0), free to self-host and offline-capable - data never leaves your machine. On a tight budget at scale, Muse Glimmer is the value pick.

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview (Tencent, China) and Muse Glimmer (Meta, US) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. Hunyuan Hy4 Preview is tencent's open-sourced (Apache 2.0) next-generation Hunyuan flagship preview, released August 28, 2026 as a 770B-parameter (49B active) MoE model that helped optimize its own training pipeline. Muse Glimmer is meta's open ~30B agentic model - runs tool-using AI agents locally on a single consumer GPU, offline and free, though it trails frontier cloud models. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecHunyuan Hy4 PreviewMuse Glimmer
ProviderTencent (China) Meta (US)
ReleasedAugust 28, 2026 August 10, 2026
Context window1M+ tokens (~1,500 pages) 128K (~197 pages)
Price (in/out)$0.834/$2.501 per 1M tokens Open weight (self-host / free)
Open weight?Yes — self-hostable Yes — self-hostable
Modalitiestext text, image, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

GPQA Diamond (92.3)

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview

Tencent's open-sourced (Apache 2.0) next-generation Hunyuan flagship preview, released August 28, 2026 as a 770B-parameter (49B active) MoE model that helped optimize its own training pipeline — and it carries the larger 1M+ tokens context.

Terminal-Bench (85.4)

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview

Muse Glimmer is comparatively weak here — published benchmarks (e.g. SWE-Bench Verified 76.0) are Meta's own

SWE-bench Multilingual (82.9)

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview

Tencent's open-sourced (Apache 2.0) next-generation Hunyuan flagship preview, released August 28, 2026 as a 770B-parameter (49B active) MoE model that helped optimize its own training pipeline — and it is the newer of the two.

Runs real agentic tasks locally on one consumer GPU - fits 24GB of VRAM in 4-bit

Muse Glimmer

Muse Glimmer lists runs real agentic tasks locally on one consumer GPU - fits 24GB of VRAM in 4-bit among its strengths; Hunyuan Hy4 Preview does not.

Open weights (Apache 2.0), free to self-host and offline-capable - data never leaves your machine

Muse Glimmer

Muse Glimmer lists open weights (Apache 2.0), free to self-host and offline-capable - data never leaves your machine among its strengths; Hunyuan Hy4 Preview does not.

Agentic by design: tool use, coding, file and screenshot reading, multi-step failure recovery

Muse Glimmer

Muse Glimmer lists agentic by design: tool use, coding, file and screenshot reading, multi-step failure recovery among its strengths; Hunyuan Hy4 Preview does not.

Lowest cost at scale

Muse Glimmer

Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of Hunyuan Hy4 Preview's $0.834/$2.501 per 1M tokens.

Largest single-prompt input

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview

Its 1M+ tokens window is about 7.6× larger than Muse Glimmer's 128K, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

Muse Glimmer

At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts Hunyuan Hy4 Preview, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview

Larger 1M+ tokens window fits more in one prompt.

Anyone whose priority is gpqa diamond (92.3)

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is runs real agentic tasks locally on one consumer gpu - fits 24gb of vram in 4-bit

Muse Glimmer

That is its strongest area.

An enterprise with regional data-residency rules

Muse Glimmer or Hunyuan Hy4 Preview

Origin (China vs US) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview: where it fits

Tencent's open-sourced (Apache 2.0) next-generation Hunyuan flagship preview, released August 28, 2026 as a 770B-parameter (49B active) MoE model that helped optimize its own training pipeline. Released August 28, 2026 by Tencent, it is built for gPQA Diamond (92.3), terminal-Bench (85.4), sWE-bench Multilingual (82.9), and large jump in long-horizon coding vs prior Hunyuan model (DeepSWE 28.0 to 64.3).

Its trade-offs are real: text-only, no native vision support, labeled a 'preview', not yet Tencent's finalized GA flagship, and sWE-Marathon score still low in absolute terms (31.9) despite a large relative jump. At $0.834 in / $2.501 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

Muse Glimmer: where it fits

Meta's open ~30B agentic model - runs tool-using AI agents locally on a single consumer GPU, offline and free, though it trails frontier cloud models. Released August 10, 2026 by Meta, it is built for runs real agentic tasks locally on one consumer GPU - fits 24GB of VRAM in 4-bit, open weights (Apache 2.0), free to self-host and offline-capable - data never leaves your machine, agentic by design: tool use, coding, file and screenshot reading, multi-step failure recovery, and 128K context, text and image input, trained on 100+ languages.

Its trade-offs: a distilled ~30B model - ceiling below its closed teacher (Muse Spark) and cloud flagships, no independent Artificial Analysis intelligence score published yet, published benchmarks (e.g. SWE-Bench Verified 76.0) are Meta's own, and 4-bit quantization to fit consumer GPUs trades away some accuracy. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.

The bottom line for this matchup

This is less "which is smarter" and more "which ecosystem fits." Hunyuan Hy4 Preview (China) and Muse Glimmer (US) differ on pricing philosophy, data-residency, and tooling as much as on raw scores. Muse Glimmer is the cheaper option, which matters at volume. The pragmatic move is to run one real task through both and judge the outputs against your own constraints — including where your data is allowed to be processed.

Want both Hunyuan Hy4 Preview and Muse Glimmer without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Hy4 Preview or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Hunyuan Hy4 Preview leans toward gpqa diamond (92.3) while Muse Glimmer leans toward runs real agentic tasks locally on one consumer gpu - fits 24gb of vram in 4-bit, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Hunyuan Hy4 Preview or Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer is cheaper — $0.834/$2.501 per 1M tokens vs Open weight (self-host / free).

Which has the bigger context window?

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview — 1M+ tokens vs 128K, about 7.6× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.

Can I use both Hunyuan Hy4 Preview and Muse Glimmer together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Hunyuan Hy4 Preview, Muse Glimmer and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Hunyuan Hy4 Preview or Muse Glimmer?

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview — released August 28, 2026, about 18 days after Muse Glimmer.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.