Grok 4 vs Grok 4.6

xAI · US  |  xAI · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Both are xAI models. Grok 4.6 is the newer, generally stronger default; reach for Grok 4 when a specific cost or latency profile matters more than the latest capabilities.

Grok 4 and Grok 4.6 are both xAI models, so the real question is not which lab to trust but which tier fits your workload and budget. Grok 4 is xAI's 2M-context model with live data access and strong reasoning chops. Grok 4.6 is xAI's Grok 4.6 - frontier-level intelligence (AA Index 61, tying GPT-5.6 Sol) at a fraction of flagship pricing, and already in Cursor and Copilot. Since both come from the same lab, the comparison below focuses on the tier-and-cost trade-offs that actually separate them.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecGrok 4Grok 4.6
ProviderxAI (US) xAI (US)
ReleasedJuly 9, 2025 August 12, 2026
Context window256K (~384 pages) 500K (~750 pages)
Price (in/out)$3/$15 per 1M tokens $2/$6 per 1M tokens
Open weight?No — API only No — API only
Modalitiestext, image, code text, image, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

256K context with native tool use

Grok 4

Grok 4 lists 256K context with native tool use among its strengths; Grok 4.6 does not.

Real-time data via X integration

Grok 4

Grok 4 lists real-time data via X integration among its strengths; Grok 4.6 does not.

Strong academic reasoning

Grok 4

Grok 4 lists strong academic reasoning among its strengths; Grok 4.6 does not.

Frontier-tier intelligence at a value price - Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 61, tying GPT-5.6 Sol

Grok 4.6

At $2/$6 per 1M tokens it undercuts Grok 4 ($3/$15 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.

Ranked #2 on Artificial Analysis's independent GDPval agentic test, behind only Claude Opus 5

Grok 4.6

Grok 4 is comparatively weak here — less independent benchmark coverage

$2/$6 per million tokens - a fraction of Claude Opus 5 or GPT-5.6 Sol

Grok 4.6

Its 500K window holds about 2× more than Grok 4's 256K in a single prompt.

Lowest cost at scale

Grok 4.6

At $2/$6 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.

Largest single-prompt input

Grok 4.6

Its 500K window is about 2× larger than Grok 4's 256K, fitting roughly 750 pages in one prompt.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

Grok 4.6

At $2/$6 per 1M tokens it undercuts Grok 4, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

Grok 4.6

Larger 500K window fits more in one prompt.

Anyone whose priority is 256k context with native tool use

Grok 4

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is frontier-tier intelligence at a value price - artificial analysis intelligence index 61, tying gpt-5.6 sol

Grok 4.6

That is its strongest area.

Grok 4: where it fits

XAI's 2M-context model with live data access and strong reasoning chops. Released July 9, 2025 by xAI, it is built for 256K context with native tool use, real-time data via X integration, strong academic reasoning, and no long-context surcharge.

Its trade-offs are real: smaller ecosystem than OpenAI/Google, and less independent benchmark coverage. At $3 in / $15 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

Grok 4.6: where it fits

XAI's Grok 4.6 - frontier-level intelligence (AA Index 61, tying GPT-5.6 Sol) at a fraction of flagship pricing, and already in Cursor and Copilot. Released August 12, 2026 by xAI, it is built for frontier-tier intelligence at a value price - Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 61, tying GPT-5.6 Sol, ranked #2 on Artificial Analysis's independent GDPval agentic test, behind only Claude Opus 5, $2/$6 per million tokens - a fraction of Claude Opus 5 or GPT-5.6 Sol, and 500K-token context; available same-day in Cursor and (two days later) GitHub Copilot.

Its trade-offs: coding gains (DeepSWE 65.9, APEX-Agents 57.5) are xAI's own numbers, not independently reproduced, parameter count is undisclosed, text and image input only - not a full multimodal model, and fast-moving target: xAI says Grok 4.7 is only weeks away. At $2 in / $6 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

Because Grok 4 and Grok 4.6 come from the same lab (xAI), they share the same training philosophy and ecosystem — the decision is purely tier vs. cost. Grok 4.6 is the more capable, more recent option; the other earns its place only when its price or latency profile fits a specific job better. Most teams should default to Grok 4.6 and drop down only with a concrete reason.

Want both Grok 4 and Grok 4.6 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 or Grok 4.6 better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Grok 4 leans toward 256k context with native tool use while Grok 4.6 leans toward frontier-tier intelligence at a value price - artificial analysis intelligence index 61, tying gpt-5.6 sol, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4 or Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 is cheaper — $3/$15 per 1M tokens vs $2/$6 per 1M tokens, roughly 1.5× apart on input.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.6 — 500K vs 256K, about 2× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.

Should I upgrade from Grok 4 to Grok 4.6?

Since both are xAI models, the newer one (Grok 4.6) is usually the better default unless you need a specific cost or latency profile from the other.

Which is newer, Grok 4 or Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 — released August 12, 2026, about 13 months after Grok 4.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.