Pick Grok 4.5 for cheap, token-efficient agentic coding — about gpt-5.5-codex quality at roughly half the cost or extreme token efficiency — around 4x fewer output tokens per task than opus 4.8. Pick MAI-Thinking-1 for very strong math reasoning (aime 2025 97%, aime 2026 94.5%) or microsoft's first in-house flagship reasoner, trained without openai distillation. On a tight budget at scale, MAI-Thinking-1 is the value pick.
Grok 4.5 (xAI) and MAI-Thinking-1 (Microsoft) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Grok 4.5 is xAI's first coding-focused model — pitched as Opus-class but faster, more token-efficient, and cheaper, undercutting GPT-5.5-Codex. MAI-Thinking-1 is microsoft's first fully in-house flagship reasoning model — a Claude-class reasoner built independently to cut its OpenAI dependence. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences
Context window: Grok 4.5 holds 2× more — 500K (~750 pages) vs 256K (~384 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
Recency: Grok 4.5 is the newer model by about 36 days (released July 8, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Specifications
Spec
Grok 4.5
MAI-Thinking-1
Provider
xAI (US)
Microsoft (US)
Released
July 8, 2026
June 2, 2026
Context window
500K (~750 pages)
256K (~384 pages)
Price (in/out)
$2/$6 per 1M tokens
Not published
Open weight?
No — API only
No — API only
Modalities
text, image, code
text, code
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
Cheap, token-efficient agentic coding — about GPT-5.5-Codex quality at roughly half the cost: Grok 4.5 — Its 500K window holds about 2× more than MAI-Thinking-1's 256K in a single prompt.
Extreme token efficiency — around 4x fewer output tokens per task than Opus 4.8: Grok 4.5 — XAI's first coding-focused model — pitched as Opus-class but faster, more token-efficient, and cheaper, undercutting GPT-5.5-Codex — and it carries the larger 500K context.
In-IDE coding, trained on real Cursor developer sessions and shipped natively in Cursor: Grok 4.5 — XAI's first coding-focused model — pitched as Opus-class but faster, more token-efficient, and cheaper, undercutting GPT-5.5-Codex — and it is the newer of the two.
Very strong math reasoning (AIME 2025 97%, AIME 2026 94.5%): MAI-Thinking-1 — MAI-Thinking-1 lists very strong math reasoning (AIME 2025 97%, AIME 2026 94.5%) among its strengths; Grok 4.5 does not.
Microsoft's first in-house flagship reasoner, trained without OpenAI distillation: MAI-Thinking-1 — MAI-Thinking-1 lists microsoft's first in-house flagship reasoner, trained without OpenAI distillation among its strengths; Grok 4.5 does not.
Efficient reasoning at low token cost for its class: MAI-Thinking-1 — Grok 4.5 is comparatively weak here — smaller 500K context (halved from the 1M generation), with pricing that doubles above 200K tokens
Lowest cost at scale: MAI-Thinking-1 — Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of Grok 4.5's $2/$6 per 1M tokens.
Largest single-prompt input: Grok 4.5 — Its 500K window is about 2× larger than MAI-Thinking-1's 256K, fitting roughly 750 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume: MAI-Thinking-1 — At Not published it undercuts Grok 4.5, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases: Grok 4.5 — Larger 500K window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is cheap, token-efficient agentic coding — about gpt-5.5-codex quality at roughly half the cost: Grok 4.5 — It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is very strong math reasoning (aime 2025 97%, aime 2026 94.5%): MAI-Thinking-1 — That is its strongest area.
Grok 4.5: where it fits
XAI's first coding-focused model — pitched as Opus-class but faster, more token-efficient, and cheaper, undercutting GPT-5.5-Codex. Released July 8, 2026 by xAI, it is built for cheap, token-efficient agentic coding — about GPT-5.5-Codex quality at roughly half the cost, extreme token efficiency — around 4x fewer output tokens per task than Opus 4.8, in-IDE coding, trained on real Cursor developer sessions and shipped natively in Cursor, and top-tier placement on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
Its trade-offs are real: smaller 500K context (halved from the 1M generation), with pricing that doubles above 200K tokens, and eU launch delayed; no open weights. At $2 in / $6 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
MAI-Thinking-1: where it fits
Microsoft's first fully in-house flagship reasoning model — a Claude-class reasoner built independently to cut its OpenAI dependence. Released June 2, 2026 by Microsoft, it is built for very strong math reasoning (AIME 2025 97%, AIME 2026 94.5%), microsoft's first in-house flagship reasoner, trained without OpenAI distillation, efficient reasoning at low token cost for its class, and competitive with Claude Opus 4.6 on SWE-Bench Pro (vendor-reported).
Its trade-offs: closed and in private preview — no open weights, no published pricing, thin availability, and benchmarks are largely self-reported.
The bottom line for this matchup
Grok 4.5 and MAI-Thinking-1 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. MAI-Thinking-1 costs less per token; Grok 4.5 holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Grok 4.5 for cheap, token-efficient agentic coding — about gpt-5.5-codex quality at roughly half the cost, MAI-Thinking-1 for very strong math reasoning (aime 2025 97%, aime 2026 94.5%). Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.5 or MAI-Thinking-1 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Grok 4.5 leans toward cheap, token-efficient agentic coding — about gpt-5.5-codex quality at roughly half the cost while MAI-Thinking-1 leans toward very strong math reasoning (aime 2025 97%, aime 2026 94.5%), and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.5 or MAI-Thinking-1?
MAI-Thinking-1 is cheaper — $2/$6 per 1M tokens vs Not published.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.5 — 500K vs 256K, about 2× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Grok 4.5 and MAI-Thinking-1 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Grok 4.5, MAI-Thinking-1 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Grok 4.5 or MAI-Thinking-1?
Grok 4.5 — released July 8, 2026, about 36 days after MAI-Thinking-1.
Grok 4.5 vs MAI-Thinking-1
xAI · US | Microsoft · US · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick Grok 4.5 for cheap, token-efficient agentic coding — about gpt-5.5-codex quality at roughly half the cost or extreme token efficiency — around 4x fewer output tokens per task than opus 4.8. Pick MAI-Thinking-1 for very strong math reasoning (aime 2025 97%, aime 2026 94.5%) or microsoft's first in-house flagship reasoner, trained without openai distillation. On a tight budget at scale, MAI-Thinking-1 is the value pick.
Grok 4.5 (xAI) and MAI-Thinking-1 (Microsoft) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Grok 4.5 is xAI's first coding-focused model — pitched as Opus-class but faster, more token-efficient, and cheaper, undercutting GPT-5.5-Codex. MAI-Thinking-1 is microsoft's first fully in-house flagship reasoning model — a Claude-class reasoner built independently to cut its OpenAI dependence. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
▸Context window: Grok 4.5 holds 2× more — 500K (~750 pages) vs 256K (~384 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
▸Recency: Grok 4.5 is the newer model by about 36 days (released July 8, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
Spec
Grok 4.5
MAI-Thinking-1
Provider
xAI (US)
Microsoft (US)
Released
July 8, 2026
June 2, 2026
Context window
500K (~750 pages)
256K (~384 pages)
Price (in/out)
$2/$6 per 1M tokens
Not published
Open weight?
No — API only
No — API only
Modalities
text, image, code
text, code
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
Cheap, token-efficient agentic coding — about GPT-5.5-Codex quality at roughly half the cost
Grok 4.5
Its 500K window holds about 2× more than MAI-Thinking-1's 256K in a single prompt.
Extreme token efficiency — around 4x fewer output tokens per task than Opus 4.8
Grok 4.5
XAI's first coding-focused model — pitched as Opus-class but faster, more token-efficient, and cheaper, undercutting GPT-5.5-Codex — and it carries the larger 500K context.
In-IDE coding, trained on real Cursor developer sessions and shipped natively in Cursor
Grok 4.5
XAI's first coding-focused model — pitched as Opus-class but faster, more token-efficient, and cheaper, undercutting GPT-5.5-Codex — and it is the newer of the two.
Very strong math reasoning (AIME 2025 97%, AIME 2026 94.5%)
MAI-Thinking-1
MAI-Thinking-1 lists very strong math reasoning (AIME 2025 97%, AIME 2026 94.5%) among its strengths; Grok 4.5 does not.
Microsoft's first in-house flagship reasoner, trained without OpenAI distillation
MAI-Thinking-1
MAI-Thinking-1 lists microsoft's first in-house flagship reasoner, trained without OpenAI distillation among its strengths; Grok 4.5 does not.
Efficient reasoning at low token cost for its class
MAI-Thinking-1
Grok 4.5 is comparatively weak here — smaller 500K context (halved from the 1M generation), with pricing that doubles above 200K tokens
Lowest cost at scale
MAI-Thinking-1
Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of Grok 4.5's $2/$6 per 1M tokens.
Largest single-prompt input
Grok 4.5
Its 500K window is about 2× larger than MAI-Thinking-1's 256K, fitting roughly 750 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ MAI-Thinking-1
At Not published it undercuts Grok 4.5, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ Grok 4.5
Larger 500K window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is cheap, token-efficient agentic coding — about gpt-5.5-codex quality at roughly half the cost
→ Grok 4.5
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is very strong math reasoning (aime 2025 97%, aime 2026 94.5%)
→ MAI-Thinking-1
That is its strongest area.
Grok 4.5: where it fits
XAI's first coding-focused model — pitched as Opus-class but faster, more token-efficient, and cheaper, undercutting GPT-5.5-Codex. Released July 8, 2026 by xAI, it is built for cheap, token-efficient agentic coding — about GPT-5.5-Codex quality at roughly half the cost, extreme token efficiency — around 4x fewer output tokens per task than Opus 4.8, in-IDE coding, trained on real Cursor developer sessions and shipped natively in Cursor, and top-tier placement on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
Its trade-offs are real: smaller 500K context (halved from the 1M generation), with pricing that doubles above 200K tokens, and eU launch delayed; no open weights. At $2 in / $6 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
MAI-Thinking-1: where it fits
Microsoft's first fully in-house flagship reasoning model — a Claude-class reasoner built independently to cut its OpenAI dependence. Released June 2, 2026 by Microsoft, it is built for very strong math reasoning (AIME 2025 97%, AIME 2026 94.5%), microsoft's first in-house flagship reasoner, trained without OpenAI distillation, efficient reasoning at low token cost for its class, and competitive with Claude Opus 4.6 on SWE-Bench Pro (vendor-reported).
Its trade-offs: closed and in private preview — no open weights, no published pricing, thin availability, and benchmarks are largely self-reported.
The bottom line for this matchup
Grok 4.5 and MAI-Thinking-1 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. MAI-Thinking-1 costs less per token; Grok 4.5 holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Grok 4.5 for cheap, token-efficient agentic coding — about gpt-5.5-codex quality at roughly half the cost, MAI-Thinking-1 for very strong math reasoning (aime 2025 97%, aime 2026 94.5%). Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Want both Grok 4.5 and MAI-Thinking-1 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Grok 4.5 leans toward cheap, token-efficient agentic coding — about gpt-5.5-codex quality at roughly half the cost while MAI-Thinking-1 leans toward very strong math reasoning (aime 2025 97%, aime 2026 94.5%), and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.5 or MAI-Thinking-1?
MAI-Thinking-1 is cheaper — $2/$6 per 1M tokens vs Not published.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.5 — 500K vs 256K, about 2× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Grok 4.5 and MAI-Thinking-1 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Grok 4.5, MAI-Thinking-1 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Grok 4.5 or MAI-Thinking-1?
Grok 4.5 — released July 8, 2026, about 36 days after MAI-Thinking-1.
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.