GPT-6 Sol vs Muse Wonder 1.0
OpenAI · US | Meta · US · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick GPT-6 Sol for openai's everyday-work tier below gpt-6 astra, built with the same methods that improved astra's professional work, factuality, coding, computer use, and alignment or openai says it makes about half as many mistakes as gpt-5.6 sol. Pick Muse Wonder 1.0 for meta superintelligence labs' first frontier-class reasoning model — a new line distinct from the agentic-coding-focused muse spark family or artificial analysis intelligence index score of 52 (a gated 'wonder full' subscription variant scores 56, tied with claude sonnet 5.5, behind only opus 5.5 at 58). On a tight budget at scale, GPT-6 Sol is the value pick.
GPT-6 Sol (OpenAI) and Muse Wonder 1.0 (Meta) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. GPT-6 Sol is openAI's September 22, 2026 mid-tier update — Astra-derived improvements at half the GPT-5.6 Sol price, $2/$10 per million tokens. Muse Wonder 1.0 is meta Superintelligence Labs' October 12, 2026 debut frontier model — distinct from Muse Spark, scoring 52 on the independent Artificial Analysis Index with a 1M-token, four-modality context window. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
- ▸Price: GPT-6 Sol is about 2× cheaper on input ($2/$10 per 1M tokens vs $4/$20 per 1M tokens) — meaningful once you are processing millions of tokens a month.
- ▸Context window: 1.05M tokens vs 1M tokens — within a few percent of each other, so treat this as a tie and test on your own long inputs, since usable recall varies by model.
- ▸Recency: Muse Wonder 1.0 is the newer model by about 20 days (released October 12, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | GPT-6 Sol | Muse Wonder 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI (US) | Meta (US) |
| Released | September 22, 2026 | October 12, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M tokens (~1,575 pages) | 1M tokens (~1,573 pages) |
| Price (in/out) | $2/$10 per 1M tokens | $4/$20 per 1M tokens |
| Open weight? | No — API only | No — API only |
| Modalities | text, image | text, image, video, audio |
| SWE-Bench Verified | Not published | Not published |
| MRCR v2 @ 1M | Not published | Not published |
Who wins what
OpenAI's everyday-work tier below GPT-6 Astra, built with the same methods that improved Astra's professional work, factuality, coding, computer use, and alignment
GPT-6 Sol
Muse Wonder 1.0 is comparatively weak here — benchmark comparisons against Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra are Meta's own self-reported figures
OpenAI says it makes about half as many mistakes as GPT-5.6 Sol
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI's September 22, 2026 mid-tier update — Astra-derived improvements at half the GPT-5.6 Sol price, $2/$10 per million tokens — and it runs cheaper at $2/$10 per 1M tokens.
Priced at half of the GPT-5.6 Sol/Luna generation's rates ($2/$10 vs GPT-5.6 Sol's $5/$30)
GPT-6 Sol
At $2/$10 per 1M tokens it undercuts Muse Wonder 1.0 ($4/$20 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.
Meta Superintelligence Labs' first frontier-class reasoning model — a new line distinct from the agentic-coding-focused Muse Spark family
Muse Wonder 1.0
GPT-6 Sol is comparatively weak here — more reasoning capability than sibling GPT-6 Luna, but still positioned below flagship GPT-6 Astra
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index score of 52 (a gated 'Wonder Full' subscription variant scores 56, tied with Claude Sonnet 5.5, behind only Opus 5.5 at 58)
Muse Wonder 1.0
Meta Superintelligence Labs' October 12, 2026 debut frontier model — distinct from Muse Spark, scoring 52 on the independent Artificial Analysis Index with a 1M-token, four-modality context window — and it is the newer of the two.
78.8% on DeepSWE v1.1 long-horizon coding, ahead of both Claude Opus 5.5 (74.2%) and GPT-6 Astra (74.1%)
Muse Wonder 1.0
Muse Wonder 1.0 lists 78.8% on DeepSWE v1.1 long-horizon coding, ahead of both Claude Opus 5.5 (74.2%) and GPT-6 Astra (74.1%) among its strengths; GPT-6 Sol does not.
Lowest cost at scale
GPT-6 Sol
At $2/$10 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ GPT-6 Sol
At $2/$10 per 1M tokens it undercuts Muse Wonder 1.0, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ GPT-6 Sol
Larger 1.05M tokens window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is openai's everyday-work tier below gpt-6 astra, built with the same methods that improved astra's professional work, factuality, coding, computer use, and alignment
→ GPT-6 Sol
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is meta superintelligence labs' first frontier-class reasoning model — a new line distinct from the agentic-coding-focused muse spark family
→ Muse Wonder 1.0
That is its strongest area.
GPT-6 Sol: where it fits
OpenAI's September 22, 2026 mid-tier update — Astra-derived improvements at half the GPT-5.6 Sol price, $2/$10 per million tokens. Released September 22, 2026 by OpenAI, it is built for openAI's everyday-work tier below GPT-6 Astra, built with the same methods that improved Astra's professional work, factuality, coding, computer use, and alignment, openAI says it makes about half as many mistakes as GPT-5.6 Sol, priced at half of the GPT-5.6 Sol/Luna generation's rates ($2/$10 vs GPT-5.6 Sol's $5/$30), and 1.05M-token context window, input capped at 922K.
Its trade-offs are real: more reasoning capability than sibling GPT-6 Luna, but still positioned below flagship GPT-6 Astra, and cache-read pricing ($0.20/MTok) still costlier than Luna's ($0.01/MTok) for high-cache workloads. At $2 in / $10 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
Muse Wonder 1.0: where it fits
Meta Superintelligence Labs' October 12, 2026 debut frontier model — distinct from Muse Spark, scoring 52 on the independent Artificial Analysis Index with a 1M-token, four-modality context window. Released October 12, 2026 by Meta, it is built for meta Superintelligence Labs' first frontier-class reasoning model — a new line distinct from the agentic-coding-focused Muse Spark family, artificial Analysis Intelligence Index score of 52 (a gated 'Wonder Full' subscription variant scores 56, tied with Claude Sonnet 5.5, behind only Opus 5.5 at 58), 78.8% on DeepSWE v1.1 long-horizon coding, ahead of both Claude Opus 5.5 (74.2%) and GPT-6 Astra (74.1%), and accepts text, image, video, audio, and PDF input against a 1,048,576-token context window.
Its trade-offs: the stronger 'Wonder Full' variant is gated behind $50/$200-per-month Muse Code subscriptions, with no public API or independently verifiable pricing, meta's full safety report had not been published as of launch, first release in a brand-new model family — no track record yet next to Meta's more established Muse Spark line, and benchmark comparisons against Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra are Meta's own self-reported figures. At $4 in / $20 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
GPT-6 Sol and Muse Wonder 1.0 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. GPT-6 Sol costs less per token; GPT-6 Sol holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — GPT-6 Sol for openai's everyday-work tier below gpt-6 astra, built with the same methods that improved astra's professional work, factuality, coding, computer use, and alignment, Muse Wonder 1.0 for meta superintelligence labs' first frontier-class reasoning model — a new line distinct from the agentic-coding-focused muse spark family. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Want both GPT-6 Sol and Muse Wonder 1.0 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
See pricingFrequently asked questions
Is GPT-6 Sol or Muse Wonder 1.0 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, GPT-6 Sol leans toward openai's everyday-work tier below gpt-6 astra, built with the same methods that improved astra's professional work, factuality, coding, computer use, and alignment while Muse Wonder 1.0 leans toward meta superintelligence labs' first frontier-class reasoning model — a new line distinct from the agentic-coding-focused muse spark family, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Sol or Muse Wonder 1.0?
GPT-6 Sol is cheaper — $2/$10 per 1M tokens vs $4/$20 per 1M tokens, roughly 2× apart on input.
Which has the bigger context window?
Effectively neither — 1.05M tokens vs 1M tokens is a difference of a few percent. Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.
Can I use both GPT-6 Sol and Muse Wonder 1.0 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you GPT-6 Sol, Muse Wonder 1.0 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, GPT-6 Sol or Muse Wonder 1.0?
Muse Wonder 1.0 — released October 12, 2026, about 20 days after GPT-6 Sol.
Related comparisons
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.