GPT-6.1 Terra vs Muse Glimmer
OpenAI · US | Meta · US · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Terra for $1/$5 per million tokens (cached input $0.05) - half the price of gpt-6.1 sol and gpt-5.6 terra or terminal-bench 4.0 of 50.3% at maximum reasoning effort, versus 21.5% for gpt-5.6 terra (openai-reported). Pick Muse Glimmer for runs real agentic tasks locally on one consumer gpu - fits 24gb of vram in 4-bit or open weights (apache 2.0), free to self-host and offline-capable - data never leaves your machine. Choose Muse Glimmer if you need self-hosting or data privacy; GPT-6.1 Terra if you want a managed API.
GPT-6.1 Terra (OpenAI) and Muse Glimmer (Meta) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. GPT-6.1 Terra is openAI's October 26, 2026 mid-tier model - a 1.05M-context, computer-use-capable GPT at $1/$5 per million tokens, half the price of its predecessor. Muse Glimmer is meta's open ~30B agentic model - runs tool-using AI agents locally on a single consumer GPU, offline and free, though it trails frontier cloud models. They diverge most on price, context window and open vs. closed weights — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
- ▸Cost model: Muse Glimmer ships open weights you can self-host (hardware cost only, no per-token fee), while GPT-6.1 Terra is API-metered at $1/$5 per 1M tokens. Your choice depends on whether you want zero marginal cost at the price of running infrastructure.
- ▸Context window: GPT-6.1 Terra holds 8× more — 1.05M tokens (~1,575 pages) vs 128K (~197 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
- ▸Recency: GPT-6.1 Terra is the newer model by about 3 months (released October 26, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | GPT-6.1 Terra | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI (US) | Meta (US) |
| Released | October 26, 2026 | August 10, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M tokens (~1,575 pages) | 128K (~197 pages) |
| Price (in/out) | $1/$5 per 1M tokens | Open weight (self-host / free) |
| Open weight? | No — API only | Yes — self-hostable |
| Modalities | text, image, code | text, image, code |
| SWE-Bench Verified | Not published | Not published |
| MRCR v2 @ 1M | Not published | Not published |
Who wins what
$1/$5 per million tokens (cached input $0.05) - half the price of GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-6.1 Terra
Its 1.05M tokens window holds about 8× more than Muse Glimmer's 128K in a single prompt.
Terminal-Bench 4.0 of 50.3% at maximum reasoning effort, versus 21.5% for GPT-5.6 Terra (OpenAI-reported)
GPT-6.1 Terra
Muse Glimmer is comparatively weak here — published benchmarks (e.g. SWE-Bench Verified 76.0) are Meta's own
1.05M-token context with up to 128K output tokens, plus image input and computer use via the Responses API
GPT-6.1 Terra
OpenAI's October 26, 2026 mid-tier model - a 1.05M-context, computer-use-capable GPT at $1/$5 per million tokens, half the price of its predecessor — and it carries the larger 1.05M tokens context.
Runs real agentic tasks locally on one consumer GPU - fits 24GB of VRAM in 4-bit
Muse Glimmer
Open weights make this possible at all — GPT-6.1 Terra is API-only, so it cannot leave the vendor's servers.
Open weights (Apache 2.0), free to self-host and offline-capable - data never leaves your machine
Muse Glimmer
GPT-6.1 Terra is comparatively weak here — closed weights and no fine-tuning support
Agentic by design: tool use, coding, file and screenshot reading, multi-step failure recovery
Muse Glimmer
GPT-6.1 Terra is comparatively weak here — openAI still positions Sol and Astra as the higher-capability choices for demanding coding problems
Lowest cost at scale
Muse Glimmer
Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of GPT-6.1 Terra's $1/$5 per 1M tokens.
Largest single-prompt input
GPT-6.1 Terra
Its 1.05M tokens window is about 8× larger than Muse Glimmer's 128K, fitting roughly 1,575 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ Muse Glimmer
At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts GPT-6.1 Terra, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ GPT-6.1 Terra
Larger 1.05M tokens window fits more in one prompt.
A team with data-privacy or self-hosting needs
→ Muse Glimmer
Open weights let you run it on your own hardware; GPT-6.1 Terra is API-only.
Anyone whose priority is $1/$5 per million tokens (cached input $0.05) - half the price of gpt-6.1 sol and gpt-5.6 terra
→ GPT-6.1 Terra
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is runs real agentic tasks locally on one consumer gpu - fits 24gb of vram in 4-bit
→ Muse Glimmer
That is its strongest area.
GPT-6.1 Terra: where it fits
OpenAI's October 26, 2026 mid-tier model - a 1.05M-context, computer-use-capable GPT at $1/$5 per million tokens, half the price of its predecessor. Released October 26, 2026 by OpenAI, it is built for $1/$5 per million tokens (cached input $0.05) - half the price of GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-5.6 Terra, terminal-Bench 4.0 of 50.3% at maximum reasoning effort, versus 21.5% for GPT-5.6 Terra (OpenAI-reported), 1.05M-token context with up to 128K output tokens, plus image input and computer use via the Responses API, and error rate on OpenAI's hard-prompt set falls from 53.6% (GPT-5.6 Terra) to 16.7% at low effort and 4.3% at max effort.
Its trade-offs are real: openAI still positions Sol and Astra as the higher-capability choices for demanding coding problems, requests above 272K input tokens are billed at 2x input and 1.5x output for the whole request, closed weights and no fine-tuning support, and benchmark figures are vendor-reported; no SWE-bench Verified or MRCR numbers published. At $1 in / $5 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
Muse Glimmer: where it fits
Meta's open ~30B agentic model - runs tool-using AI agents locally on a single consumer GPU, offline and free, though it trails frontier cloud models. Released August 10, 2026 by Meta, it is built for runs real agentic tasks locally on one consumer GPU - fits 24GB of VRAM in 4-bit, open weights (Apache 2.0), free to self-host and offline-capable - data never leaves your machine, agentic by design: tool use, coding, file and screenshot reading, multi-step failure recovery, and 128K context, text and image input, trained on 100+ languages.
Its trade-offs: a distilled ~30B model - ceiling below its closed teacher (Muse Spark) and cloud flagships, no independent Artificial Analysis intelligence score published yet, published benchmarks (e.g. SWE-Bench Verified 76.0) are Meta's own, and 4-bit quantization to fit consumer GPUs trades away some accuracy. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.
The bottom line for this matchup
The defining split here is open vs. closed. Muse Glimmer gives you weights you control — self-host it, fine-tune it, keep data in-house, pay only for hardware. GPT-6.1 Terra gives you a managed, always-updated API with no infrastructure to run. Teams with GPUs, privacy requirements, or huge volume often favour the open model; teams that want zero ops and the latest capabilities favour the closed one. Capability is close enough that this operational question, not the benchmark, usually decides it.
Want both GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Glimmer without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
See pricingFrequently asked questions
Is GPT-6.1 Terra or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, GPT-6.1 Terra leans toward $1/$5 per million tokens (cached input $0.05) - half the price of gpt-6.1 sol and gpt-5.6 terra while Muse Glimmer leans toward runs real agentic tasks locally on one consumer gpu - fits 24gb of vram in 4-bit, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Terra or Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is open-weight, so self-hosting means no per-token fee (you pay for hardware instead), while GPT-6.1 Terra is API-metered at $1/$5 per 1M tokens. For most teams without GPUs, the API model is cheaper to start; at very high volume, self-hosting can win.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-6.1 Terra — 1.05M tokens vs 128K, about 8× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Glimmer together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you GPT-6.1 Terra, Muse Glimmer and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, GPT-6.1 Terra or Muse Glimmer?
GPT-6.1 Terra — released October 26, 2026, about 3 months after Muse Glimmer.
Related comparisons
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.