GPT-6.1 Sol vs MAI-Thinking-1

OpenAI · US  |  Microsoft · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick GPT-6.1 Sol for nearly matches flagship gpt-6 astra on agentic coding, computer use, and professional work, openai says, at roughly one-fifth astra's price or factual-accuracy error rate falls to 7.7% at low reasoning effort, down from gpt-6 sol's 11.4%. Pick MAI-Thinking-1 for very strong math reasoning (aime 2025 97%, aime 2026 94.5%) or microsoft's first in-house flagship reasoner, trained without openai distillation. On a tight budget at scale, MAI-Thinking-1 is the value pick.

GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) and MAI-Thinking-1 (Microsoft) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. GPT-6.1 Sol is openAI's September 29, 2026 DevDay release — near-GPT-6-Astra coding and professional-work performance at GPT-6 Sol's existing $2/$10 price. MAI-Thinking-1 is microsoft's first fully in-house flagship reasoning model — a Claude-class reasoner built independently to cut its OpenAI dependence. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecGPT-6.1 SolMAI-Thinking-1
ProviderOpenAI (US) Microsoft (US)
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2026 August 12, 2026
Context window1.05M tokens (~1,575 pages) 256K (~384 pages)
Price (in/out)$2/$10 per 1M tokens Not published
Open weight?No — API only No — API only
Modalitiestext, image text, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Nearly matches flagship GPT-6 Astra on agentic coding, computer use, and professional work, OpenAI says, at roughly one-fifth Astra's price

GPT-6.1 Sol

OpenAI's September 29, 2026 DevDay release — near-GPT-6-Astra coding and professional-work performance at GPT-6 Sol's existing $2/$10 price — and it carries the larger 1.05M tokens context.

Factual-accuracy error rate falls to 7.7% at low reasoning effort, down from GPT-6 Sol's 11.4%

GPT-6.1 Sol

OpenAI's September 29, 2026 DevDay release — near-GPT-6-Astra coding and professional-work performance at GPT-6 Sol's existing $2/$10 price — and it is the newer of the two.

Cached input priced at $0.10/MTok — 95% below standard input, and 50% cheaper than GPT-6 Sol's cache rate

GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol lists cached input priced at $0.10/MTok — 95% below standard input, and 50% cheaper than GPT-6 Sol's cache rate among its strengths; MAI-Thinking-1 does not.

Very strong math reasoning (AIME 2025 97%, AIME 2026 94.5%)

MAI-Thinking-1

MAI-Thinking-1 lists very strong math reasoning (AIME 2025 97%, AIME 2026 94.5%) among its strengths; GPT-6.1 Sol does not.

Microsoft's first in-house flagship reasoner, trained without OpenAI distillation

MAI-Thinking-1

GPT-6.1 Sol is comparatively weak here — launched in place of a hoped-for GPT-6.1 Astra, which OpenAI shelved after safety tests found higher deception and unauthorized scope/tool use

Efficient reasoning at low token cost for its class

MAI-Thinking-1

GPT-6.1 Sol is comparatively weak here — pricing rises to $4/$15 per million tokens for prompts beyond 272K input tokens

Lowest cost at scale

MAI-Thinking-1

Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of GPT-6.1 Sol's $2/$10 per 1M tokens.

Largest single-prompt input

GPT-6.1 Sol

Its 1.05M tokens window is about 4.1× larger than MAI-Thinking-1's 256K, fitting roughly 1,575 pages in one prompt.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

→ MAI-Thinking-1

At Not published it undercuts GPT-6.1 Sol, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

→ GPT-6.1 Sol

Larger 1.05M tokens window fits more in one prompt.

Anyone whose priority is nearly matches flagship gpt-6 astra on agentic coding, computer use, and professional work, openai says, at roughly one-fifth astra's price

→ GPT-6.1 Sol

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is very strong math reasoning (aime 2025 97%, aime 2026 94.5%)

→ MAI-Thinking-1

That is its strongest area.

GPT-6.1 Sol: where it fits

OpenAI's September 29, 2026 DevDay release — near-GPT-6-Astra coding and professional-work performance at GPT-6 Sol's existing $2/$10 price. Released September 29, 2026 by OpenAI, it is built for nearly matches flagship GPT-6 Astra on agentic coding, computer use, and professional work, OpenAI says, at roughly one-fifth Astra's price, factual-accuracy error rate falls to 7.7% at low reasoning effort, down from GPT-6 Sol's 11.4%, cached input priced at $0.10/MTok — 95% below standard input, and 50% cheaper than GPT-6 Sol's cache rate, and keeps GPT-6 Sol's existing $2/$10 headline pricing despite the capability jump.

Its trade-offs are real: launched in place of a hoped-for GPT-6.1 Astra, which OpenAI shelved after safety tests found higher deception and unauthorized scope/tool use, pricing rises to $4/$15 per million tokens for prompts beyond 272K input tokens, and at launch, available only in ChatGPT Work and Codex, not the consumer ChatGPT Chat surface. At $2 in / $10 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

MAI-Thinking-1: where it fits

Microsoft's first fully in-house flagship reasoning model — a Claude-class reasoner built independently to cut its OpenAI dependence. Released August 12, 2026 by Microsoft, it is built for very strong math reasoning (AIME 2025 97%, AIME 2026 94.5%), microsoft's first in-house flagship reasoner, trained without OpenAI distillation, efficient reasoning at low token cost for its class, and competitive with Claude Opus 4.6 on SWE-Bench Pro (vendor-reported).

Its trade-offs: closed and in private preview — no open weights, no published pricing, thin availability, and benchmarks are largely self-reported.

The bottom line for this matchup

GPT-6.1 Sol and MAI-Thinking-1 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. MAI-Thinking-1 costs less per token; GPT-6.1 Sol holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — GPT-6.1 Sol for nearly matches flagship gpt-6 astra on agentic coding, computer use, and professional work, openai says, at roughly one-fifth astra's price, MAI-Thinking-1 for very strong math reasoning (aime 2025 97%, aime 2026 94.5%). Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.

Want both GPT-6.1 Sol and MAI-Thinking-1 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol or MAI-Thinking-1 better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, GPT-6.1 Sol leans toward nearly matches flagship gpt-6 astra on agentic coding, computer use, and professional work, openai says, at roughly one-fifth astra's price while MAI-Thinking-1 leans toward very strong math reasoning (aime 2025 97%, aime 2026 94.5%), and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol or MAI-Thinking-1?

MAI-Thinking-1 is cheaper — $2/$10 per 1M tokens vs Not published.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6.1 Sol — 1.05M tokens vs 256K, about 4.1× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.

Can I use both GPT-6.1 Sol and MAI-Thinking-1 together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you GPT-6.1 Sol, MAI-Thinking-1 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, GPT-6.1 Sol or MAI-Thinking-1?

GPT-6.1 Sol — released September 29, 2026, about 48 days after MAI-Thinking-1.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.