GPT-5.3-Codex vs Hunyuan Hy4 Preview

OpenAI · US  |  Tencent · China · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick GPT-5.3-Codex for dedicated coding agent or cli and ide integration. Pick Hunyuan Hy4 Preview for gpqa diamond (92.3) or terminal-bench (85.4). Choose Hunyuan Hy4 Preview if you need self-hosting or data privacy; GPT-5.3-Codex if you want a managed API.

GPT-5.3-Codex (OpenAI, US) and Hunyuan Hy4 Preview (Tencent, China) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. GPT-5.3-Codex is openAI's coding-specialized agent model for autonomous software engineering. Hunyuan Hy4 Preview is tencent's open-sourced (Apache 2.0) next-generation Hunyuan flagship preview, released August 28, 2026 as a 770B-parameter (49B active) MoE model that helped optimize its own training pipeline. They diverge most on price, context window and open vs. closed weights — each quantified below from the models' real specs.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecGPT-5.3-CodexHunyuan Hy4 Preview
ProviderOpenAI (US) Tencent (China)
ReleasedFebruary 5, 2026 August 28, 2026
Context window400K (~600 pages) 1M+ tokens (~1,500 pages)
Price (in/out)$1.75/$14 per 1M tokens $0.834/$2.501 per 1M tokens
Open weight?No — API only Yes — self-hostable
Modalitiestext, code text
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Dedicated coding agent

GPT-5.3-Codex

GPT-5.3-Codex lists dedicated coding agent among its strengths; Hunyuan Hy4 Preview does not.

CLI and IDE integration

GPT-5.3-Codex

GPT-5.3-Codex lists cLI and IDE integration among its strengths; Hunyuan Hy4 Preview does not.

Autonomous software tasks

GPT-5.3-Codex

GPT-5.3-Codex lists autonomous software tasks among its strengths; Hunyuan Hy4 Preview does not.

GPQA Diamond (92.3)

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview

Tencent's open-sourced (Apache 2.0) next-generation Hunyuan flagship preview, released August 28, 2026 as a 770B-parameter (49B active) MoE model that helped optimize its own training pipeline — and it runs cheaper at $0.834/$2.501 per 1M tokens.

Terminal-Bench (85.4)

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview

Tencent's open-sourced (Apache 2.0) next-generation Hunyuan flagship preview, released August 28, 2026 as a 770B-parameter (49B active) MoE model that helped optimize its own training pipeline — and it carries the larger 1M+ tokens context.

SWE-bench Multilingual (82.9)

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview

Tencent's open-sourced (Apache 2.0) next-generation Hunyuan flagship preview, released August 28, 2026 as a 770B-parameter (49B active) MoE model that helped optimize its own training pipeline — and its weights are open while GPT-5.3-Codex is API-only.

Lowest cost at scale

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview

At $0.834/$2.501 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.

Largest single-prompt input

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview

Its 1M+ tokens window is about 2.5× larger than GPT-5.3-Codex's 400K, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview

At $0.834/$2.501 per 1M tokens it undercuts GPT-5.3-Codex, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview

Larger 1M+ tokens window fits more in one prompt.

A team with data-privacy or self-hosting needs

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview

Open weights let you run it on your own hardware; GPT-5.3-Codex is API-only.

Anyone whose priority is dedicated coding agent

GPT-5.3-Codex

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is gpqa diamond (92.3)

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview

That is its strongest area.

An enterprise with regional data-residency rules

GPT-5.3-Codex or Hunyuan Hy4 Preview

Origin (US vs China) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.

GPT-5.3-Codex: where it fits

OpenAI's coding-specialized agent model for autonomous software engineering. Released February 5, 2026 by OpenAI, it is built for dedicated coding agent, cLI and IDE integration, autonomous software tasks, and tool calling.

Its trade-offs are real: coding-specialized, narrower general use, and retired in favor of GPT-5.5 Codex. At $1.75 in / $14 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview: where it fits

Tencent's open-sourced (Apache 2.0) next-generation Hunyuan flagship preview, released August 28, 2026 as a 770B-parameter (49B active) MoE model that helped optimize its own training pipeline. Released August 28, 2026 by Tencent, it is built for gPQA Diamond (92.3), terminal-Bench (85.4), sWE-bench Multilingual (82.9), and large jump in long-horizon coding vs prior Hunyuan model (DeepSWE 28.0 to 64.3).

Its trade-offs: text-only, no native vision support, labeled a 'preview', not yet Tencent's finalized GA flagship, and sWE-Marathon score still low in absolute terms (31.9) despite a large relative jump. At $0.834 in / $2.501 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

The defining split here is open vs. closed. Hunyuan Hy4 Preview gives you weights you control — self-host it, fine-tune it, keep data in-house, pay only for hardware. GPT-5.3-Codex gives you a managed, always-updated API with no infrastructure to run. Teams with GPUs, privacy requirements, or huge volume often favour the open model; teams that want zero ops and the latest capabilities favour the closed one. Capability is close enough that this operational question, not the benchmark, usually decides it.

Want both GPT-5.3-Codex and Hunyuan Hy4 Preview without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.3-Codex or Hunyuan Hy4 Preview better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, GPT-5.3-Codex leans toward dedicated coding agent while Hunyuan Hy4 Preview leans toward gpqa diamond (92.3), and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3-Codex or Hunyuan Hy4 Preview?

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview is open-weight, so self-hosting means no per-token fee (you pay for hardware instead), while GPT-5.3-Codex is API-metered at $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens. For most teams without GPUs, the API model is cheaper to start; at very high volume, self-hosting can win.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview — 1M+ tokens vs 400K, about 2.5× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.

Can I use both GPT-5.3-Codex and Hunyuan Hy4 Preview together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you GPT-5.3-Codex, Hunyuan Hy4 Preview and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, GPT-5.3-Codex or Hunyuan Hy4 Preview?

Hunyuan Hy4 Preview — released August 28, 2026, about 7 months after GPT-5.3-Codex.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.