GPT-4o mini vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

OpenAI · US  |  Moonshot AI · China · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick GPT-4o mini for very low cost per token for its capability tier or strong coding for a small model (87.2% humaneval). Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro for sparse moe with 2.8t total and about 104b active parameters, post-trained from the kimi k3 base or terminal-bench 4.0 of 65.7% (moonshot) and 67% as measured by artificial analysis. On a tight budget at scale, GPT-4o mini is the value pick.

GPT-4o mini (OpenAI, US) and Kimi K3.1 Pro (Moonshot AI, China) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. GPT-4o mini is openAI's budget small multimodal model — cheap, fast text-and-vision intelligence that outscored peer small models like Gemini 1.5 Flash and Claude 3 Haiku on MMLU and HumanEval at launch. Kimi K3.1 Pro is moonshot's October 23, 2026 post-training upgrade to Kimi K3 - a 2.8T-parameter MoE at $2/$10 with open weights promised by November 4. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecGPT-4o miniKimi K3.1 Pro
ProviderOpenAI (US) Moonshot AI (China)
ReleasedJuly 18, 2024 October 23, 2026
Context window128K (~192 pages) 1M tokens (~1,573 pages)
Price (in/out)$0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens $2/$10 per 1M tokens
Open weight?No — API only No — API only
Modalitiestext, image text, image, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Very low cost per token for its capability tier

GPT-4o mini

At $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens it undercuts Kimi K3.1 Pro ($2/$10 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.

Strong coding for a small model (87.2% HumanEval)

GPT-4o mini

OpenAI's budget small multimodal model — cheap, fast text-and-vision intelligence that outscored peer small models like Gemini 1.5 Flash and Claude 3 Haiku on MMLU and HumanEval at launch — and it runs cheaper at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.

Leading MMLU among peer small models (82%)

GPT-4o mini

GPT-4o mini lists leading MMLU among peer small models (82%) among its strengths; Kimi K3.1 Pro does not.

Sparse MoE with 2.8T total and about 104B active parameters, post-trained from the Kimi K3 base

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Moonshot's October 23, 2026 post-training upgrade to Kimi K3 - a 2.8T-parameter MoE at $2/$10 with open weights promised by November 4 — and it carries the larger 1M tokens context.

Terminal-Bench 4.0 of 65.7% (Moonshot) and 67% as measured by Artificial Analysis

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Moonshot's October 23, 2026 post-training upgrade to Kimi K3 - a 2.8T-parameter MoE at $2/$10 with open weights promised by November 4 — and it is the newer of the two.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index of 55, second only to Claude Opus 5.5 (58) among the models AI Weekly lists

Kimi K3.1 Pro

GPT-4o mini is comparatively weak here — weaker on hard reasoning and coding than frontier models

Lowest cost at scale

GPT-4o mini

At $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.

Largest single-prompt input

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Its 1M tokens window is about 8.2× larger than GPT-4o mini's 128K, fitting roughly 1,573 pages in one prompt.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

→ GPT-4o mini

At $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens it undercuts Kimi K3.1 Pro, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

→ Kimi K3.1 Pro

Larger 1M tokens window fits more in one prompt.

Anyone whose priority is very low cost per token for its capability tier

→ GPT-4o mini

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is sparse moe with 2.8t total and about 104b active parameters, post-trained from the kimi k3 base

→ Kimi K3.1 Pro

That is its strongest area.

An enterprise with regional data-residency rules

→ GPT-4o mini or Kimi K3.1 Pro

Origin (US vs China) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.

GPT-4o mini: where it fits

OpenAI's budget small multimodal model — cheap, fast text-and-vision intelligence that outscored peer small models like Gemini 1.5 Flash and Claude 3 Haiku on MMLU and HumanEval at launch. Released July 18, 2024 by OpenAI, it is built for very low cost per token for its capability tier, strong coding for a small model (87.2% HumanEval), leading MMLU among peer small models (82%), and text and image (vision) understanding in the API.

Its trade-offs are real: only 128K context with an October 2023 knowledge cutoff, and weaker on hard reasoning and coding than frontier models. At $0.15 in / $0.6 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

Kimi K3.1 Pro: where it fits

Moonshot's October 23, 2026 post-training upgrade to Kimi K3 - a 2.8T-parameter MoE at $2/$10 with open weights promised by November 4. Released October 23, 2026 by Moonshot AI, it is built for sparse MoE with 2.8T total and about 104B active parameters, post-trained from the Kimi K3 base, terminal-Bench 4.0 of 65.7% (Moonshot) and 67% as measured by Artificial Analysis, artificial Analysis Intelligence Index of 55, second only to Claude Opus 5.5 (58) among the models AI Weekly lists, and standard API price cut by a third versus K3 to $2/$10 per million tokens (Highspeed tier $4/$20).

Its trade-offs: weights promised by November 4, 2026 and not confirmed public as of November 3; license terms not yet disclosed, very high output-token use: roughly 150M output tokens across the Artificial Analysis index, self-hosting is impractical - about 1.4 TB of raw weights even at 4-bit, and most benchmarks are internal or use differing harnesses; no SWE-bench Verified figure published. At $2 in / $10 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

This is less "which is smarter" and more "which ecosystem fits." GPT-4o mini (US) and Kimi K3.1 Pro (China) differ on pricing philosophy, data-residency, and tooling as much as on raw scores. GPT-4o mini is the cheaper option, which matters at volume. The pragmatic move is to run one real task through both and judge the outputs against your own constraints — including where your data is allowed to be processed.

Want both GPT-4o mini and Kimi K3.1 Pro without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4o mini or Kimi K3.1 Pro better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, GPT-4o mini leans toward very low cost per token for its capability tier while Kimi K3.1 Pro leans toward sparse moe with 2.8t total and about 104b active parameters, post-trained from the kimi k3 base, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o mini or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

GPT-4o mini is cheaper — $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens vs $2/$10 per 1M tokens, roughly 13× apart on input.

Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K3.1 Pro — 1M tokens vs 128K, about 8.2× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.

Can I use both GPT-4o mini and Kimi K3.1 Pro together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you GPT-4o mini, Kimi K3.1 Pro and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, GPT-4o mini or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Kimi K3.1 Pro — released October 23, 2026, about 28 months after GPT-4o mini.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.