GPT-4.1 Mini vs Hunyuan Hy3

OpenAI · US  |  Tencent · China · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick GPT-4.1 Mini for very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens or instruction following above its weight class — 84.1% on ifeval, beating gpt-4o. Pick Hunyuan Hy3 for frontier-level reported reasoning and science (gpqa diamond 90.4) at low active-parameter cost or runs a 295b model at the cost of a 21b — only 21b parameters active per token. Choose Hunyuan Hy3 if you need self-hosting or data privacy; GPT-4.1 Mini if you want a managed API.

GPT-4.1 Mini (OpenAI, US) and Hunyuan Hy3 (Tencent, China) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. GPT-4.1 Mini is a cheap, fast 1M-context workhorse with strong instruction following but weak coding — already retired from ChatGPT. Hunyuan Hy3 is a 295B Apache-2.0 open MoE that reaches frontier reasoning quality while running at roughly 21B active-parameter cost. They diverge most on price, context window and open vs. closed weights — each quantified below from the models' real specs.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecGPT-4.1 MiniHunyuan Hy3
ProviderOpenAI (US) Tencent (China)
ReleasedApril 14, 2025 July 6, 2026
Context window1M (~1,571 pages) 256K (~384 pages)
Price (in/out)$0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens Open weight (self-host / free)
Open weight?No — API only Yes — self-hostable
Modalitiestext, image, code text, code
SWE-Bench Verified23.6% Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens

GPT-4.1 Mini

Its 1M window holds about 4.1× more than Hunyuan Hy3's 256K in a single prompt.

Instruction following above its weight class — 84.1% on IFEval, beating GPT-4o

GPT-4.1 Mini

A cheap, fast 1M-context workhorse with strong instruction following but weak coding — already retired from ChatGPT — and it carries the larger 1M context.

Multi-turn coherence for its tier — 35.8% on MultiChallenge, roughly 1.8x GPT-4o mini

GPT-4.1 Mini

GPT-4.1 Mini lists multi-turn coherence for its tier — 35.8% on MultiChallenge, roughly 1.8x GPT-4o mini among its strengths; Hunyuan Hy3 does not.

Frontier-level reported reasoning and science (GPQA Diamond 90.4) at low active-parameter cost

Hunyuan Hy3

GPT-4.1 Mini is comparatively weak here — a June 2024 knowledge cutoff, now roughly two years stale, and no reasoning mode

Runs a 295B model at the cost of a 21B — only 21B parameters active per token

Hunyuan Hy3

A 295B Apache-2.0 open MoE that reaches frontier reasoning quality while running at roughly 21B active-parameter cost — and its weights are open while GPT-4.1 Mini is API-only.

Clean, unrestricted Apache-2.0 license with no geographic carve-out

Hunyuan Hy3

A 295B Apache-2.0 open MoE that reaches frontier reasoning quality while running at roughly 21B active-parameter cost — and it is the newer of the two.

Lowest cost at scale

Hunyuan Hy3

Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of GPT-4.1 Mini's $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens.

Largest single-prompt input

GPT-4.1 Mini

Its 1M window is about 4.1× larger than Hunyuan Hy3's 256K, fitting roughly 1,571 pages in one prompt.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

Hunyuan Hy3

At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts GPT-4.1 Mini, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

GPT-4.1 Mini

Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.

A team with data-privacy or self-hosting needs

Hunyuan Hy3

Open weights let you run it on your own hardware; GPT-4.1 Mini is API-only.

Anyone whose priority is very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens

GPT-4.1 Mini

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is frontier-level reported reasoning and science (gpqa diamond 90.4) at low active-parameter cost

Hunyuan Hy3

That is its strongest area.

An enterprise with regional data-residency rules

GPT-4.1 Mini or Hunyuan Hy3

Origin (US vs China) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.

GPT-4.1 Mini: where it fits

A cheap, fast 1M-context workhorse with strong instruction following but weak coding — already retired from ChatGPT. Released April 14, 2025 by OpenAI, it is built for very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens, instruction following above its weight class — 84.1% on IFEval, beating GPT-4o, multi-turn coherence for its tier — 35.8% on MultiChallenge, roughly 1.8x GPT-4o mini, and a full 1M context at flat pricing, with no long-context premium.

Its trade-offs are real: weak at agentic coding — its 23.6% on SWE-Bench Verified sits below GPT-4o's 33.2%, retired from ChatGPT in February 2026, and OpenAI's own docs now point users to GPT-5 mini instead, and a June 2024 knowledge cutoff, now roughly two years stale, and no reasoning mode. At $0.4 in / $1.6 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

Hunyuan Hy3: where it fits

A 295B Apache-2.0 open MoE that reaches frontier reasoning quality while running at roughly 21B active-parameter cost. Released July 6, 2026 by Tencent, it is built for frontier-level reported reasoning and science (GPQA Diamond 90.4) at low active-parameter cost, runs a 295B model at the cost of a 21B — only 21B parameters active per token, clean, unrestricted Apache-2.0 license with no geographic carve-out, and broad day-one ecosystem support plus an FP8 checkpoint.

Its trade-offs: benchmarks are largely self-reported, and the ultra-low hosted pricing is a limited promotion, and the hosted API is China-jurisdiction, and self-hosting a 295B MoE still needs serious hardware. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.

The bottom line for this matchup

The defining split here is open vs. closed. Hunyuan Hy3 gives you weights you control — self-host it, fine-tune it, keep data in-house, pay only for hardware. GPT-4.1 Mini gives you a managed, always-updated API with no infrastructure to run. Teams with GPUs, privacy requirements, or huge volume often favour the open model; teams that want zero ops and the latest capabilities favour the closed one. Capability is close enough that this operational question, not the benchmark, usually decides it.

Want both GPT-4.1 Mini and Hunyuan Hy3 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.1 Mini or Hunyuan Hy3 better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for Hunyuan Hy3, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, GPT-4.1 Mini leans toward very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens while Hunyuan Hy3 leans toward frontier-level reported reasoning and science (gpqa diamond 90.4) at low active-parameter cost, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Mini or Hunyuan Hy3?

Hunyuan Hy3 is open-weight, so self-hosting means no per-token fee (you pay for hardware instead), while GPT-4.1 Mini is API-metered at $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens. For most teams without GPUs, the API model is cheaper to start; at very high volume, self-hosting can win.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-4.1 Mini — 1M vs 256K, about 4.1× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.

Can I use both GPT-4.1 Mini and Hunyuan Hy3 together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you GPT-4.1 Mini, Hunyuan Hy3 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, GPT-4.1 Mini or Hunyuan Hy3?

Hunyuan Hy3 — released July 6, 2026, about 15 months after GPT-4.1 Mini.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.