Pick GLM 5.2 for long-horizon agentic coding or project-level software engineering. Pick GPT-5.5 for terminal, cli and computer-use automation or long-horizon tool sequencing. Choose GLM 5.2 if you need self-hosting or data privacy; GPT-5.5 if you want a managed API.
GLM 5.2 (Z.ai, China) and GPT-5.5 (OpenAI, US) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. GLM 5.2 is an open-weight reasoning model built for long-horizon coding and multi-step agent workflows — strong and cheap. GPT-5.5 is openAI's first fully retrained base since GPT-4.5 — the terminal and computer-use champion. They diverge most on price and open vs. closed weights — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences
Price: GLM 5.2 is about 5.1× cheaper on input ($0.98/$3.08 per 1M tokens vs $5/$30 per 1M tokens) — a large enough gap that at scale it can be the single biggest line item in the decision.
Context window: both advertise 1M (~1,500 pages). Tie on paper — test on your own long inputs, since usable recall varies by model.
Recency: GLM 5.2 is the newer model by about 54 days (released June 16, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Ecosystem: this is a China-vs-US matchup — they differ in pricing philosophy, data-residency options, and tooling ecosystems, not only benchmarks.
Specifications
Spec
GLM 5.2
GPT-5.5
Provider
Z.ai (China)
OpenAI (US)
Released
June 16, 2026
April 23, 2026
Context window
1M (~1,500 pages)
1M (~1,500 pages)
Price (in/out)
$0.98/$3.08 per 1M tokens
$5/$30 per 1M tokens
Open weight?
Yes — self-hostable
No — API only
Modalities
text, code
text, image, audio, video, code
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
Long-horizon agentic coding: GLM 5.2 — A core design strength of GLM 5.2.
Project-level software engineering: GLM 5.2 — A core design strength of GLM 5.2.
Tool use across long-running tasks: GLM 5.2 — A core design strength of GLM 5.2.
Terminal, CLI and computer-use automation: GPT-5.5 — A core design strength of GPT-5.5.
Long-horizon tool sequencing: GPT-5.5 — A core design strength of GPT-5.5.
Natively omnimodal input: GPT-5.5 — A core design strength of GPT-5.5.
Lowest cost at scale: GLM 5.2 — At $0.98/$3.08 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume: GLM 5.2 — At $0.98/$3.08 per 1M tokens it undercuts GPT-5.5, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
A team with data-privacy or self-hosting needs: GLM 5.2 — Open weights let you run it on your own hardware; GPT-5.5 is API-only.
Anyone whose priority is long-horizon agentic coding: GLM 5.2 — It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is terminal, cli and computer-use automation: GPT-5.5 — That is its strongest area.
An enterprise with regional data-residency rules: GPT-5.5 or GLM 5.2 — Origin (China vs US) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.
GLM 5.2: where it fits
An open-weight reasoning model built for long-horizon coding and multi-step agent workflows — strong and cheap. Released June 16, 2026 by Z.ai, it is built for long-horizon agentic coding, project-level software engineering, tool use across long-running tasks, and tops the open-weight intelligence index.
Its trade-offs are real: text-only — no native multimodal input, and new release with a limited third-party track record. At $0.98 in / $3.08 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
GPT-5.5: where it fits
OpenAI's first fully retrained base since GPT-4.5 — the terminal and computer-use champion. Released April 23, 2026 by OpenAI, it is built for terminal, CLI and computer-use automation, long-horizon tool sequencing, natively omnimodal input, and browser-driving agents.
Its trade-offs: trails Opus 4.8 on hardest coding benchmarks, and tiered long-context pricing above 272K tokens. At $5 in / $30 out per million tokens, it sits in the premium price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
The defining split here is open vs. closed. GLM 5.2 gives you weights you control — self-host it, fine-tune it, keep data in-house, pay only for hardware. GPT-5.5 gives you a managed, always-updated API with no infrastructure to run. Teams with GPUs, privacy requirements, or huge volume often favour the open model; teams that want zero ops and the latest capabilities favour the closed one. Capability is close enough that this operational question, not the benchmark, usually decides it.
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM 5.2 or GPT-5.5 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, GLM 5.2 leans toward long-horizon agentic coding while GPT-5.5 leans toward terminal, cli and computer-use automation, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.2 or GPT-5.5?
GLM 5.2 is open-weight, so self-hosting means no per-token fee (you pay for hardware instead), while GPT-5.5 is API-metered at $5/$30 per 1M tokens. For most teams without GPUs, the API model is cheaper to start; at very high volume, self-hosting can win.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both advertise 1M (~1,500 pages). Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.
Can I use both GLM 5.2 and GPT-5.5 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you GLM 5.2, GPT-5.5 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, GLM 5.2 or GPT-5.5?
GLM 5.2 — released June 16, 2026, about 54 days after GPT-5.5.
GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.5
Z.ai · China | OpenAI · US · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick GLM 5.2 for long-horizon agentic coding or project-level software engineering. Pick GPT-5.5 for terminal, cli and computer-use automation or long-horizon tool sequencing. Choose GLM 5.2 if you need self-hosting or data privacy; GPT-5.5 if you want a managed API.
GLM 5.2 (Z.ai, China) and GPT-5.5 (OpenAI, US) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. GLM 5.2 is an open-weight reasoning model built for long-horizon coding and multi-step agent workflows — strong and cheap. GPT-5.5 is openAI's first fully retrained base since GPT-4.5 — the terminal and computer-use champion. They diverge most on price and open vs. closed weights — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
▸Price: GLM 5.2 is about 5.1× cheaper on input ($0.98/$3.08 per 1M tokens vs $5/$30 per 1M tokens) — a large enough gap that at scale it can be the single biggest line item in the decision.
▸Context window: both advertise 1M (~1,500 pages). Tie on paper — test on your own long inputs, since usable recall varies by model.
▸Recency: GLM 5.2 is the newer model by about 54 days (released June 16, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
▸Ecosystem: this is a China-vs-US matchup — they differ in pricing philosophy, data-residency options, and tooling ecosystems, not only benchmarks.
Side-by-side specs
Spec
GLM 5.2
GPT-5.5
Provider
Z.ai (China)
OpenAI (US)
Released
June 16, 2026
April 23, 2026
Context window
1M (~1,500 pages)
1M (~1,500 pages)
Price (in/out)
$0.98/$3.08 per 1M tokens
$5/$30 per 1M tokens
Open weight?
Yes — self-hostable
No — API only
Modalities
text, code
text, image, audio, video, code
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
Long-horizon agentic coding
GLM 5.2
A core design strength of GLM 5.2.
Project-level software engineering
GLM 5.2
A core design strength of GLM 5.2.
Tool use across long-running tasks
GLM 5.2
A core design strength of GLM 5.2.
Terminal, CLI and computer-use automation
GPT-5.5
A core design strength of GPT-5.5.
Long-horizon tool sequencing
GPT-5.5
A core design strength of GPT-5.5.
Natively omnimodal input
GPT-5.5
A core design strength of GPT-5.5.
Lowest cost at scale
GLM 5.2
At $0.98/$3.08 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ GLM 5.2
At $0.98/$3.08 per 1M tokens it undercuts GPT-5.5, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
A team with data-privacy or self-hosting needs
→ GLM 5.2
Open weights let you run it on your own hardware; GPT-5.5 is API-only.
Anyone whose priority is long-horizon agentic coding
→ GLM 5.2
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is terminal, cli and computer-use automation
→ GPT-5.5
That is its strongest area.
An enterprise with regional data-residency rules
→ GPT-5.5 or GLM 5.2
Origin (China vs US) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.
GLM 5.2: where it fits
An open-weight reasoning model built for long-horizon coding and multi-step agent workflows — strong and cheap. Released June 16, 2026 by Z.ai, it is built for long-horizon agentic coding, project-level software engineering, tool use across long-running tasks, and tops the open-weight intelligence index.
Its trade-offs are real: text-only — no native multimodal input, and new release with a limited third-party track record. At $0.98 in / $3.08 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
GPT-5.5: where it fits
OpenAI's first fully retrained base since GPT-4.5 — the terminal and computer-use champion. Released April 23, 2026 by OpenAI, it is built for terminal, CLI and computer-use automation, long-horizon tool sequencing, natively omnimodal input, and browser-driving agents.
Its trade-offs: trails Opus 4.8 on hardest coding benchmarks, and tiered long-context pricing above 272K tokens. At $5 in / $30 out per million tokens, it sits in the premium price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
The defining split here is open vs. closed. GLM 5.2 gives you weights you control — self-host it, fine-tune it, keep data in-house, pay only for hardware. GPT-5.5 gives you a managed, always-updated API with no infrastructure to run. Teams with GPUs, privacy requirements, or huge volume often favour the open model; teams that want zero ops and the latest capabilities favour the closed one. Capability is close enough that this operational question, not the benchmark, usually decides it.
Want both GLM 5.2 and GPT-5.5 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, GLM 5.2 leans toward long-horizon agentic coding while GPT-5.5 leans toward terminal, cli and computer-use automation, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.2 or GPT-5.5?
GLM 5.2 is open-weight, so self-hosting means no per-token fee (you pay for hardware instead), while GPT-5.5 is API-metered at $5/$30 per 1M tokens. For most teams without GPUs, the API model is cheaper to start; at very high volume, self-hosting can win.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both advertise 1M (~1,500 pages). Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.
Can I use both GLM 5.2 and GPT-5.5 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you GLM 5.2, GPT-5.5 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, GLM 5.2 or GPT-5.5?
GLM 5.2 — released June 16, 2026, about 54 days after GPT-5.5.
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.