GLM 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra
Z.ai · China | OpenAI · US · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick GLM 5.1 for long-horizon autonomous agentic engineering (up to 8-hour runs) or state-of-the-art open-weight coding (topped swe-bench pro at launch). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra for $1/$5 per million tokens (cached input $0.05) - half the price of gpt-6.1 sol and gpt-5.6 terra or terminal-bench 4.0 of 50.3% at maximum reasoning effort, versus 21.5% for gpt-5.6 terra (openai-reported). Choose GLM 5.1 if you need self-hosting or data privacy; GPT-6.1 Terra if you want a managed API.
GLM 5.1 (Z.ai, China) and GPT-6.1 Terra (OpenAI, US) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. GLM 5.1 is an open-weight (MIT) Chinese coding model built for long-horizon agentic engineering, topping SWE-Bench Pro at launch while running autonomously for up to 8 hours. GPT-6.1 Terra is openAI's October 26, 2026 mid-tier model - a 1.05M-context, computer-use-capable GPT at $1/$5 per million tokens, half the price of its predecessor. They diverge most on price, context window and open vs. closed weights — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
- ▸Price: GPT-6.1 Terra is about 1.4× cheaper on input ($1/$5 per 1M tokens vs $1.4/$4.4 per 1M tokens) — modest, but it adds up at steady volume.
- ▸Context window: GPT-6.1 Terra holds 5.3× more — 1.05M tokens (~1,575 pages) vs 200K (~300 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
- ▸Recency: GPT-6.1 Terra is the newer model by about 7 months (released October 26, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
- ▸Ecosystem: this is a China-vs-US matchup — they differ in pricing philosophy, data-residency options, and tooling ecosystems, not only benchmarks.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | GLM 5.1 | GPT-6.1 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (China) | OpenAI (US) |
| Released | April 7, 2026 | October 26, 2026 |
| Context window | 200K (~300 pages) | 1.05M tokens (~1,575 pages) |
| Price (in/out) | $1.4/$4.4 per 1M tokens | $1/$5 per 1M tokens |
| Open weight? | Yes — self-hostable | No — API only |
| Modalities | text, code | text, image, code |
| SWE-Bench Verified | Not published | Not published |
| MRCR v2 @ 1M | Not published | Not published |
Who wins what
Long-horizon autonomous agentic engineering (up to 8-hour runs)
GLM 5.1
An open-weight (MIT) Chinese coding model built for long-horizon agentic engineering, topping SWE-Bench Pro at launch while running autonomously for up to 8 hours — and its weights are open while GPT-6.1 Terra is API-only.
State-of-the-art open-weight coding (topped SWE-Bench Pro at launch)
GLM 5.1
Open weights make this possible at all — GPT-6.1 Terra is API-only, so it cannot leave the vendor's servers.
Sustained tool use across thousands of calls
GLM 5.1
GLM 5.1 lists sustained tool use across thousands of calls among its strengths; GPT-6.1 Terra does not.
$1/$5 per million tokens (cached input $0.05) - half the price of GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-6.1 Terra
At $1/$5 per 1M tokens it undercuts GLM 5.1 ($1.4/$4.4 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.
Terminal-Bench 4.0 of 50.3% at maximum reasoning effort, versus 21.5% for GPT-5.6 Terra (OpenAI-reported)
GPT-6.1 Terra
OpenAI's October 26, 2026 mid-tier model - a 1.05M-context, computer-use-capable GPT at $1/$5 per million tokens, half the price of its predecessor — and it runs cheaper at $1/$5 per 1M tokens.
1.05M-token context with up to 128K output tokens, plus image input and computer use via the Responses API
GPT-6.1 Terra
Its 1.05M tokens window holds about 5.3× more than GLM 5.1's 200K in a single prompt.
Lowest cost at scale
GPT-6.1 Terra
At $1/$5 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Largest single-prompt input
GPT-6.1 Terra
Its 1.05M tokens window is about 5.3× larger than GLM 5.1's 200K, fitting roughly 1,575 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ GPT-6.1 Terra
At $1/$5 per 1M tokens it undercuts GLM 5.1, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ GPT-6.1 Terra
Larger 1.05M tokens window fits more in one prompt.
A team with data-privacy or self-hosting needs
→ GLM 5.1
Open weights let you run it on your own hardware; GPT-6.1 Terra is API-only.
Anyone whose priority is long-horizon autonomous agentic engineering (up to 8-hour runs)
→ GLM 5.1
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is $1/$5 per million tokens (cached input $0.05) - half the price of gpt-6.1 sol and gpt-5.6 terra
→ GPT-6.1 Terra
That is its strongest area.
An enterprise with regional data-residency rules
→ GPT-6.1 Terra or GLM 5.1
Origin (China vs US) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.
GLM 5.1: where it fits
An open-weight (MIT) Chinese coding model built for long-horizon agentic engineering, topping SWE-Bench Pro at launch while running autonomously for up to 8 hours. Released April 7, 2026 by Z.ai, it is built for long-horizon autonomous agentic engineering (up to 8-hour runs), state-of-the-art open-weight coding (topped SWE-Bench Pro at launch), sustained tool use across thousands of calls, and self-hostable under a permissive MIT license.
Its trade-offs are real: text-only, with no image, audio, or video input, and 754B-parameter MoE demands heavy GPU resources to self-host. At $1.4 in / $4.4 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
GPT-6.1 Terra: where it fits
OpenAI's October 26, 2026 mid-tier model - a 1.05M-context, computer-use-capable GPT at $1/$5 per million tokens, half the price of its predecessor. Released October 26, 2026 by OpenAI, it is built for $1/$5 per million tokens (cached input $0.05) - half the price of GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-5.6 Terra, terminal-Bench 4.0 of 50.3% at maximum reasoning effort, versus 21.5% for GPT-5.6 Terra (OpenAI-reported), 1.05M-token context with up to 128K output tokens, plus image input and computer use via the Responses API, and error rate on OpenAI's hard-prompt set falls from 53.6% (GPT-5.6 Terra) to 16.7% at low effort and 4.3% at max effort.
Its trade-offs: openAI still positions Sol and Astra as the higher-capability choices for demanding coding problems, requests above 272K input tokens are billed at 2x input and 1.5x output for the whole request, closed weights and no fine-tuning support, and benchmark figures are vendor-reported; no SWE-bench Verified or MRCR numbers published. At $1 in / $5 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
The defining split here is open vs. closed. GLM 5.1 gives you weights you control — self-host it, fine-tune it, keep data in-house, pay only for hardware. GPT-6.1 Terra gives you a managed, always-updated API with no infrastructure to run. Teams with GPUs, privacy requirements, or huge volume often favour the open model; teams that want zero ops and the latest capabilities favour the closed one. Capability is close enough that this operational question, not the benchmark, usually decides it.
Want both GLM 5.1 and GPT-6.1 Terra without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
See pricingFrequently asked questions
Is GLM 5.1 or GPT-6.1 Terra better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, GLM 5.1 leans toward long-horizon autonomous agentic engineering (up to 8-hour runs) while GPT-6.1 Terra leans toward $1/$5 per million tokens (cached input $0.05) - half the price of gpt-6.1 sol and gpt-5.6 terra, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.1 or GPT-6.1 Terra?
GLM 5.1 is open-weight, so self-hosting means no per-token fee (you pay for hardware instead), while GPT-6.1 Terra is API-metered at $1/$5 per 1M tokens. For most teams without GPUs, the API model is cheaper to start; at very high volume, self-hosting can win.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-6.1 Terra — 1.05M tokens vs 200K, about 5.3× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both GLM 5.1 and GPT-6.1 Terra together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you GLM 5.1, GPT-6.1 Terra and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, GLM 5.1 or GPT-6.1 Terra?
GPT-6.1 Terra — released October 26, 2026, about 7 months after GLM 5.1.
Related comparisons
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.