Gemma 4 vs Grok 4.3

Google · US  |  xAI · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Gemma 4 for self-hosted, data-private deployment or running locally or on edge devices. Pick Grok 4.3 for video understanding from native video input or generating pdf, pptx, and xlsx files directly. Choose Gemma 4 if you need self-hosting or data privacy; Grok 4.3 if you want a managed API.

Gemma 4 (Google) and Grok 4.3 (xAI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Gemma 4 is google's open-weight family: Apache 2.0 licensed, multimodal, and sized from edge devices up, for private self-hosting. Grok 4.3 is the current xAI flagship: 1M context, native video input, file generation, and live X data, ahead of the still-unreleased Grok 5. They diverge most on price, context window and open vs. closed weights — each quantified below from the models' real specs.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecGemma 4Grok 4.3
ProviderGoogle (US) xAI (US)
ReleasedApril 2, 2026 April 30, 2026
Context window256K (~384 pages) 1M (~1,500 pages)
Price (in/out)Open weight (self-host / free) $1.25/$2.5 per 1M tokens
Open weight?Yes — self-hostable No — API only
Modalitiestext, image, code text, image, video, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Self-hosted, data-private deployment

Gemma 4

A core design strength of Gemma 4.

Running locally or on edge devices

Gemma 4

A core design strength of Gemma 4.

Fine-tuning on your own data

Gemma 4

A core design strength of Gemma 4.

Video understanding from native video input

Grok 4.3

A core design strength of Grok 4.3.

Generating PDF, PPTX, and XLSX files directly

Grok 4.3

A core design strength of Grok 4.3.

Real-time questions using live X data

Grok 4.3

A core design strength of Grok 4.3.

Lowest cost at scale

Gemma 4

At Open weight (self-host / free), it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.

Largest single-prompt input

Grok 4.3

Its 1M window is about 3.9× larger, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

Gemma 4

At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts Grok 4.3, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

Grok 4.3

Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.

A team with data-privacy or self-hosting needs

Gemma 4

Open weights let you run it on your own hardware; Grok 4.3 is API-only.

Anyone whose priority is self-hosted, data-private deployment

Gemma 4

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is video understanding from native video input

Grok 4.3

That is its strongest area.

Gemma 4: where it fits

Google's open-weight family: Apache 2.0 licensed, multimodal, and sized from edge devices up, for private self-hosting. Released April 2, 2026 by Google, it is built for self-hosted, data-private deployment, running locally or on edge devices, fine-tuning on your own data, and multimodal tasks over a 256K context.

Its trade-offs are real: trails frontier closed models on the hardest tasks, and needs your own hardware to run. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.

Grok 4.3: where it fits

The current xAI flagship: 1M context, native video input, file generation, and live X data, ahead of the still-unreleased Grok 5. Released April 30, 2026 by xAI, it is built for video understanding from native video input, generating PDF, PPTX, and XLSX files directly, real-time questions using live X data, and long-context, multi-agent reasoning.

Its trade-offs: higher context pricing on requests above 200K tokens, and less independent benchmark coverage than OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google. At $1.25 in / $2.5 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

The defining split here is open vs. closed. Gemma 4 gives you weights you control — self-host it, fine-tune it, keep data in-house, pay only for hardware. Grok 4.3 gives you a managed, always-updated API with no infrastructure to run. Teams with GPUs, privacy requirements, or huge volume often favour the open model; teams that want zero ops and the latest capabilities favour the closed one. Capability is close enough that this operational question, not the benchmark, usually decides it.

Want both Gemma 4 and Grok 4.3 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 or Grok 4.3 better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Gemma 4 leans toward self-hosted, data-private deployment while Grok 4.3 leans toward video understanding from native video input, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 or Grok 4.3?

Gemma 4 is open-weight, so self-hosting means no per-token fee (you pay for hardware instead), while Grok 4.3 is API-metered at $1.25/$2.5 per 1M tokens. For most teams without GPUs, the API model is cheaper to start; at very high volume, self-hosting can win.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.3 — 1M vs 256K, about 3.9× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.

Can I use both Gemma 4 and Grok 4.3 together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Gemma 4, Grok 4.3 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Gemma 4 or Grok 4.3?

Grok 4.3 — released April 30, 2026, about 28 days after Gemma 4.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.