Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B for fast, cheap inference from a sparse moe (3.8b active of 25.2b total) or near-31b-dense quality at a fraction of the compute and memory-bandwidth cost. Pick OLMo 3 32B Think for the most fully transparent open release available - ai2 publishes the complete weights, full dolma training dataset, every training checkpoint, training logs, and pretraining/instruction-tuning/rl code, not just final weights or a genuine 32b reasoning ('think') model that generates explicit chain-of-thought. On a tight budget at scale, OLMo 3 32B Think is the value pick.
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Google) and OLMo 3 32B Think (Allen Institute for AI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Gemma 4 26B A4B is an Apache-2.0 open MoE with 25.2B total but only 3.8B active parameters, delivering near-31B-dense quality at a fraction of the inference cost. OLMo 3 32B Think is allen Institute for AI's fully-open 32B reasoning model - the rare release that ships the complete training data and process, not just the weights. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences
Context window: Gemma 4 26B A4B holds 4× more — 256K (~393 pages) vs 65K (~98 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
Recency: Gemma 4 26B A4B is the newer model by about 4 months (released April 2, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Specifications
Spec
Gemma 4 26B A4B
OLMo 3 32B Think
Provider
Google (US)
Allen Institute for AI (US)
Released
April 2, 2026
November 20, 2025
Context window
256K (~393 pages)
65K (~98 pages)
Price (in/out)
$0.12/$0.37 per 1M tokens
Open weight (self-host / free)
Open weight?
Yes — self-hostable
Yes — self-hostable
Modalities
text, image, video, code
text, code
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
Fast, cheap inference from a sparse MoE (3.8B active of 25.2B total): Gemma 4 26B A4B — An Apache-2.0 open MoE with 25.2B total but only 3.8B active parameters, delivering near-31B-dense quality at a fraction of the inference cost — and it carries the larger 256K context.
Near-31B-dense quality at a fraction of the compute and memory-bandwidth cost: Gemma 4 26B A4B — Its 256K window holds about 4× more than OLMo 3 32B Think's 65K in a single prompt.
Strong reasoning and coding (88.3% AIME 2026 no-tools, 77.1% LiveCodeBench v6): Gemma 4 26B A4B — An Apache-2.0 open MoE with 25.2B total but only 3.8B active parameters, delivering near-31B-dense quality at a fraction of the inference cost — and it is the newer of the two.
The most fully transparent open release available - Ai2 publishes the complete weights, full Dolma training dataset, every training checkpoint, training logs, and pretraining/instruction-tuning/RL code, not just final weights: OLMo 3 32B Think — OLMo 3 32B Think lists the most fully transparent open release available - Ai2 publishes the complete weights, full Dolma training dataset, every training checkpoint, training logs, and pretraining/instruction-tuning/RL code, not just final weights among its strengths; Gemma 4 26B A4B does not.
A genuine 32B reasoning ('Think') model that generates explicit chain-of-thought: OLMo 3 32B Think — OLMo 3 32B Think lists a genuine 32B reasoning ('Think') model that generates explicit chain-of-thought among its strengths; Gemma 4 26B A4B does not.
Fully open under Apache 2.0 - free to self-host: OLMo 3 32B Think — OLMo 3 32B Think lists fully open under Apache 2.0 - free to self-host among its strengths; Gemma 4 26B A4B does not.
Lowest cost at scale: OLMo 3 32B Think — Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of Gemma 4 26B A4B's $0.12/$0.37 per 1M tokens.
Largest single-prompt input: Gemma 4 26B A4B — Its 256K window is about 4× larger than OLMo 3 32B Think's 65K, fitting roughly 393 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume: OLMo 3 32B Think — At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts Gemma 4 26B A4B, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases: Gemma 4 26B A4B — Larger 256K window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is fast, cheap inference from a sparse moe (3.8b active of 25.2b total): Gemma 4 26B A4B — It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is the most fully transparent open release available - ai2 publishes the complete weights, full dolma training dataset, every training checkpoint, training logs, and pretraining/instruction-tuning/rl code, not just final weights: OLMo 3 32B Think — That is its strongest area.
Gemma 4 26B A4B: where it fits
An Apache-2.0 open MoE with 25.2B total but only 3.8B active parameters, delivering near-31B-dense quality at a fraction of the inference cost. Released April 2, 2026 by Google, it is built for fast, cheap inference from a sparse MoE (3.8B active of 25.2B total), near-31B-dense quality at a fraction of the compute and memory-bandwidth cost, strong reasoning and coding (88.3% AIME 2026 no-tools, 77.1% LiveCodeBench v6), and multimodal input (text/image, plus video processed as frames up to 60s) with native function calling.
Its trade-offs are real: all 25.2B parameters must be loaded into memory even though only 3.8B are active per token, and 256K context trails 1M-token frontier rivals, and this variant has no audio input (audio is E2B/E4B/12B only). At $0.12 in / $0.37 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
OLMo 3 32B Think: where it fits
Allen Institute for AI's fully-open 32B reasoning model - the rare release that ships the complete training data and process, not just the weights. Released November 20, 2025 by Allen Institute for AI, it is built for the most fully transparent open release available - Ai2 publishes the complete weights, full Dolma training dataset, every training checkpoint, training logs, and pretraining/instruction-tuning/RL code, not just final weights, a genuine 32B reasoning ('Think') model that generates explicit chain-of-thought, fully open under Apache 2.0 - free to self-host, and built specifically to let researchers reproduce and audit exactly how the model was trained.
Its trade-offs: a 65K context window is modest next to million-token frontier models, prioritizes full openness and reproducibility over topping raw capability leaderboards, and 32B scale trails much larger frontier and open MoE models on general benchmarks. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.
The bottom line for this matchup
Gemma 4 26B A4B and OLMo 3 32B Think overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. OLMo 3 32B Think costs less per token; Gemma 4 26B A4B holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Gemma 4 26B A4B for fast, cheap inference from a sparse moe (3.8b active of 25.2b total), OLMo 3 32B Think for the most fully transparent open release available - ai2 publishes the complete weights, full dolma training dataset, every training checkpoint, training logs, and pretraining/instruction-tuning/rl code, not just final weights. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B or OLMo 3 32B Think better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Gemma 4 26B A4B leans toward fast, cheap inference from a sparse moe (3.8b active of 25.2b total) while OLMo 3 32B Think leans toward the most fully transparent open release available - ai2 publishes the complete weights, full dolma training dataset, every training checkpoint, training logs, and pretraining/instruction-tuning/rl code, not just final weights, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or OLMo 3 32B Think?
OLMo 3 32B Think is cheaper — $0.12/$0.37 per 1M tokens vs Open weight (self-host / free).
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 4 26B A4B — 256K vs 65K, about 4× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Gemma 4 26B A4B and OLMo 3 32B Think together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Gemma 4 26B A4B, OLMo 3 32B Think and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Gemma 4 26B A4B or OLMo 3 32B Think?
Gemma 4 26B A4B — released April 2, 2026, about 4 months after OLMo 3 32B Think.
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs OLMo 3 32B Think
Google · US | Allen Institute for AI · US · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B for fast, cheap inference from a sparse moe (3.8b active of 25.2b total) or near-31b-dense quality at a fraction of the compute and memory-bandwidth cost. Pick OLMo 3 32B Think for the most fully transparent open release available - ai2 publishes the complete weights, full dolma training dataset, every training checkpoint, training logs, and pretraining/instruction-tuning/rl code, not just final weights or a genuine 32b reasoning ('think') model that generates explicit chain-of-thought. On a tight budget at scale, OLMo 3 32B Think is the value pick.
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Google) and OLMo 3 32B Think (Allen Institute for AI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Gemma 4 26B A4B is an Apache-2.0 open MoE with 25.2B total but only 3.8B active parameters, delivering near-31B-dense quality at a fraction of the inference cost. OLMo 3 32B Think is allen Institute for AI's fully-open 32B reasoning model - the rare release that ships the complete training data and process, not just the weights. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
▸Context window: Gemma 4 26B A4B holds 4× more — 256K (~393 pages) vs 65K (~98 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
▸Recency: Gemma 4 26B A4B is the newer model by about 4 months (released April 2, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
Spec
Gemma 4 26B A4B
OLMo 3 32B Think
Provider
Google (US)
Allen Institute for AI (US)
Released
April 2, 2026
November 20, 2025
Context window
256K (~393 pages)
65K (~98 pages)
Price (in/out)
$0.12/$0.37 per 1M tokens
Open weight (self-host / free)
Open weight?
Yes — self-hostable
Yes — self-hostable
Modalities
text, image, video, code
text, code
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
Fast, cheap inference from a sparse MoE (3.8B active of 25.2B total)
Gemma 4 26B A4B
An Apache-2.0 open MoE with 25.2B total but only 3.8B active parameters, delivering near-31B-dense quality at a fraction of the inference cost — and it carries the larger 256K context.
Near-31B-dense quality at a fraction of the compute and memory-bandwidth cost
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Its 256K window holds about 4× more than OLMo 3 32B Think's 65K in a single prompt.
An Apache-2.0 open MoE with 25.2B total but only 3.8B active parameters, delivering near-31B-dense quality at a fraction of the inference cost — and it is the newer of the two.
The most fully transparent open release available - Ai2 publishes the complete weights, full Dolma training dataset, every training checkpoint, training logs, and pretraining/instruction-tuning/RL code, not just final weights
OLMo 3 32B Think
OLMo 3 32B Think lists the most fully transparent open release available - Ai2 publishes the complete weights, full Dolma training dataset, every training checkpoint, training logs, and pretraining/instruction-tuning/RL code, not just final weights among its strengths; Gemma 4 26B A4B does not.
A genuine 32B reasoning ('Think') model that generates explicit chain-of-thought
OLMo 3 32B Think
OLMo 3 32B Think lists a genuine 32B reasoning ('Think') model that generates explicit chain-of-thought among its strengths; Gemma 4 26B A4B does not.
Fully open under Apache 2.0 - free to self-host
OLMo 3 32B Think
OLMo 3 32B Think lists fully open under Apache 2.0 - free to self-host among its strengths; Gemma 4 26B A4B does not.
Lowest cost at scale
OLMo 3 32B Think
Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of Gemma 4 26B A4B's $0.12/$0.37 per 1M tokens.
Largest single-prompt input
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Its 256K window is about 4× larger than OLMo 3 32B Think's 65K, fitting roughly 393 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ OLMo 3 32B Think
At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts Gemma 4 26B A4B, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ Gemma 4 26B A4B
Larger 256K window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is fast, cheap inference from a sparse moe (3.8b active of 25.2b total)
→ Gemma 4 26B A4B
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is the most fully transparent open release available - ai2 publishes the complete weights, full dolma training dataset, every training checkpoint, training logs, and pretraining/instruction-tuning/rl code, not just final weights
→ OLMo 3 32B Think
That is its strongest area.
Gemma 4 26B A4B: where it fits
An Apache-2.0 open MoE with 25.2B total but only 3.8B active parameters, delivering near-31B-dense quality at a fraction of the inference cost. Released April 2, 2026 by Google, it is built for fast, cheap inference from a sparse MoE (3.8B active of 25.2B total), near-31B-dense quality at a fraction of the compute and memory-bandwidth cost, strong reasoning and coding (88.3% AIME 2026 no-tools, 77.1% LiveCodeBench v6), and multimodal input (text/image, plus video processed as frames up to 60s) with native function calling.
Its trade-offs are real: all 25.2B parameters must be loaded into memory even though only 3.8B are active per token, and 256K context trails 1M-token frontier rivals, and this variant has no audio input (audio is E2B/E4B/12B only). At $0.12 in / $0.37 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
OLMo 3 32B Think: where it fits
Allen Institute for AI's fully-open 32B reasoning model - the rare release that ships the complete training data and process, not just the weights. Released November 20, 2025 by Allen Institute for AI, it is built for the most fully transparent open release available - Ai2 publishes the complete weights, full Dolma training dataset, every training checkpoint, training logs, and pretraining/instruction-tuning/RL code, not just final weights, a genuine 32B reasoning ('Think') model that generates explicit chain-of-thought, fully open under Apache 2.0 - free to self-host, and built specifically to let researchers reproduce and audit exactly how the model was trained.
Its trade-offs: a 65K context window is modest next to million-token frontier models, prioritizes full openness and reproducibility over topping raw capability leaderboards, and 32B scale trails much larger frontier and open MoE models on general benchmarks. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.
The bottom line for this matchup
Gemma 4 26B A4B and OLMo 3 32B Think overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. OLMo 3 32B Think costs less per token; Gemma 4 26B A4B holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Gemma 4 26B A4B for fast, cheap inference from a sparse moe (3.8b active of 25.2b total), OLMo 3 32B Think for the most fully transparent open release available - ai2 publishes the complete weights, full dolma training dataset, every training checkpoint, training logs, and pretraining/instruction-tuning/rl code, not just final weights. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Want both Gemma 4 26B A4B and OLMo 3 32B Think without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B or OLMo 3 32B Think better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Gemma 4 26B A4B leans toward fast, cheap inference from a sparse moe (3.8b active of 25.2b total) while OLMo 3 32B Think leans toward the most fully transparent open release available - ai2 publishes the complete weights, full dolma training dataset, every training checkpoint, training logs, and pretraining/instruction-tuning/rl code, not just final weights, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or OLMo 3 32B Think?
OLMo 3 32B Think is cheaper — $0.12/$0.37 per 1M tokens vs Open weight (self-host / free).
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 4 26B A4B — 256K vs 65K, about 4× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Gemma 4 26B A4B and OLMo 3 32B Think together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Gemma 4 26B A4B, OLMo 3 32B Think and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Gemma 4 26B A4B or OLMo 3 32B Think?
Gemma 4 26B A4B — released April 2, 2026, about 4 months after OLMo 3 32B Think.
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.