Gemini 4 Carbon vs Grok 4.5

Google · US  |  xAI · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Gemini 4 Carbon for ranked first on the artificial analysis intelligence index v5.0 with 59 at launch (artificial analysis now shows 60) or google-reported 88.2% on sec-bench pro and 54.8% on exploitgym for vulnerability discovery and exploit validation. Pick Grok 4.5 for cheap, token-efficient agentic coding — about gpt-5.5-codex quality at roughly half the cost or extreme token efficiency — around 4x fewer output tokens per task than opus 4.8.

Gemini 4 Carbon (Google) and Grok 4.5 (xAI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Gemini 4 Carbon is google's October 28, 2026 limited release for cyber defenders - top of the Artificial Analysis index at launch, priced at $2/$10 introductory, with no public API date yet. Grok 4.5 is xAI's first coding-focused model — pitched as Opus-class but faster, more token-efficient, and cheaper, undercutting GPT-5.5-Codex. Their biggest split is context window, and the breakdown below shows exactly how that plays out for your workload.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecGemini 4 CarbonGrok 4.5
ProviderGoogle (US) xAI (US)
ReleasedOctober 28, 2026 July 8, 2026
Context window1M tokens (~1,500 pages) 500K (~750 pages)
Price (in/out)$2/$10 per 1M tokens $2/$6 per 1M tokens
Open weight?No — API only No — API only
Modalitiestext, image, audio, video, code text, image, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Ranked first on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0 with 59 at launch (Artificial Analysis now shows 60)

Gemini 4 Carbon

Grok 4.5 is comparatively weak here — eU launch delayed; no open weights

Google-reported 88.2% on SEC-bench Pro and 54.8% on ExploitGym for vulnerability discovery and exploit validation

Gemini 4 Carbon

Google's October 28, 2026 limited release for cyber defenders - top of the Artificial Analysis index at launch, priced at $2/$10 introductory, with no public API date yet — and it carries the larger 1M tokens context.

Google-reported 71.0% on CWE-bench for patching

Gemini 4 Carbon

Google's October 28, 2026 limited release for cyber defenders - top of the Artificial Analysis index at launch, priced at $2/$10 introductory, with no public API date yet — and it is the newer of the two.

Cheap, token-efficient agentic coding — about GPT-5.5-Codex quality at roughly half the cost

Grok 4.5

Grok 4.5 lists cheap, token-efficient agentic coding — about GPT-5.5-Codex quality at roughly half the cost among its strengths; Gemini 4 Carbon does not.

Extreme token efficiency — around 4x fewer output tokens per task than Opus 4.8

Grok 4.5

Grok 4.5 lists extreme token efficiency — around 4x fewer output tokens per task than Opus 4.8 among its strengths; Gemini 4 Carbon does not.

In-IDE coding, trained on real Cursor developer sessions and shipped natively in Cursor

Grok 4.5

Gemini 4 Carbon is comparatively weak here — limited release: rolling out to a subset of cyber defenders, then trusted partners via the Fairwind Program, with no date for developers or consumers

Largest single-prompt input

Gemini 4 Carbon

Its 1M tokens window is about 2× larger than Grok 4.5's 500K, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.

Which should you pick?

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

→ Gemini 4 Carbon

Larger 1M tokens window fits more in one prompt.

Anyone whose priority is ranked first on the artificial analysis intelligence index v5.0 with 59 at launch (artificial analysis now shows 60)

→ Gemini 4 Carbon

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is cheap, token-efficient agentic coding — about gpt-5.5-codex quality at roughly half the cost

→ Grok 4.5

That is its strongest area.

Gemini 4 Carbon: where it fits

Google's October 28, 2026 limited release for cyber defenders - top of the Artificial Analysis index at launch, priced at $2/$10 introductory, with no public API date yet. Released October 28, 2026 by Google, it is built for ranked first on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0 with 59 at launch (Artificial Analysis now shows 60), google-reported 88.2% on SEC-bench Pro and 54.8% on ExploitGym for vulnerability discovery and exploit validation, google-reported 71.0% on CWE-bench for patching, and introductory $2/$10 per million tokens, matching Gemini 4 Argon, with cached input 95% off.

Its trade-offs are real: limited release: rolling out to a subset of cyber defenders, then trusted partners via the Fairwind Program, with no date for developers or consumers, no public API model listing yet, so most users cannot call it today, introductory pricing rises to $4/$20 afterward, and Google has not said when that happens, and google has not published context or modality specs - the 1M window and modalities shown come from Artificial Analysis and Vals. At $2 in / $10 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

Grok 4.5: where it fits

XAI's first coding-focused model — pitched as Opus-class but faster, more token-efficient, and cheaper, undercutting GPT-5.5-Codex. Released July 8, 2026 by xAI, it is built for cheap, token-efficient agentic coding — about GPT-5.5-Codex quality at roughly half the cost, extreme token efficiency — around 4x fewer output tokens per task than Opus 4.8, in-IDE coding, trained on real Cursor developer sessions and shipped natively in Cursor, and top-tier placement on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Its trade-offs: smaller 500K context (halved from the 1M generation), with pricing that doubles above 200K tokens, and eU launch delayed; no open weights. At $2 in / $6 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

Gemini 4 Carbon and Grok 4.5 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. Gemini 4 Carbon holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Gemini 4 Carbon for ranked first on the artificial analysis intelligence index v5.0 with 59 at launch (artificial analysis now shows 60), Grok 4.5 for cheap, token-efficient agentic coding — about gpt-5.5-codex quality at roughly half the cost. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.

Want both Gemini 4 Carbon and Grok 4.5 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 4 Carbon or Grok 4.5 better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Gemini 4 Carbon leans toward ranked first on the artificial analysis intelligence index v5.0 with 59 at launch (artificial analysis now shows 60) while Grok 4.5 leans toward cheap, token-efficient agentic coding — about gpt-5.5-codex quality at roughly half the cost, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Carbon or Grok 4.5?

They are priced almost identically, so cost will not decide between them.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 4 Carbon — 1M tokens vs 500K, about 2× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.

Can I use both Gemini 4 Carbon and Grok 4.5 together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Gemini 4 Carbon, Grok 4.5 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Gemini 4 Carbon or Grok 4.5?

Gemini 4 Carbon — released October 28, 2026, about 4 months after Grok 4.5.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.