Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-4.1 Mini

Google · US  |  OpenAI · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Gemini 4 Carbon for ranked first on the artificial analysis intelligence index v5.0 with 59 at launch (artificial analysis now shows 60) or google-reported 88.2% on sec-bench pro and 54.8% on exploitgym for vulnerability discovery and exploit validation. Pick GPT-4.1 Mini for very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens or instruction following above its weight class — 84.1% on ifeval, beating gpt-4o. On a tight budget at scale, GPT-4.1 Mini is the value pick.

Gemini 4 Carbon (Google) and GPT-4.1 Mini (OpenAI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Gemini 4 Carbon is google's October 28, 2026 limited release for cyber defenders - top of the Artificial Analysis index at launch, priced at $2/$10 introductory, with no public API date yet. GPT-4.1 Mini is a cheap, fast 1M-context workhorse with strong instruction following but weak coding — already retired from ChatGPT. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecGemini 4 CarbonGPT-4.1 Mini
ProviderGoogle (US) OpenAI (US)
ReleasedOctober 28, 2026 April 14, 2025
Context window1M tokens (~1,500 pages) 1M (~1,571 pages)
Price (in/out)$2/$10 per 1M tokens $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens
Open weight?No — API only No — API only
Modalitiestext, image, audio, video, code text, image, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published 23.6%
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Ranked first on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0 with 59 at launch (Artificial Analysis now shows 60)

Gemini 4 Carbon

Google's October 28, 2026 limited release for cyber defenders - top of the Artificial Analysis index at launch, priced at $2/$10 introductory, with no public API date yet — and it is the newer of the two.

Google-reported 88.2% on SEC-bench Pro and 54.8% on ExploitGym for vulnerability discovery and exploit validation

Gemini 4 Carbon

GPT-4.1 Mini is comparatively weak here — weak at agentic coding — its 23.6% on SWE-Bench Verified sits below GPT-4o's 33.2%

Google-reported 71.0% on CWE-bench for patching

Gemini 4 Carbon

Gemini 4 Carbon lists google-reported 71.0% on CWE-bench for patching among its strengths; GPT-4.1 Mini does not.

Very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens

GPT-4.1 Mini

At $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens it undercuts Gemini 4 Carbon ($2/$10 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.

Instruction following above its weight class — 84.1% on IFEval, beating GPT-4o

GPT-4.1 Mini

A cheap, fast 1M-context workhorse with strong instruction following but weak coding — already retired from ChatGPT — and it runs cheaper at $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens.

Multi-turn coherence for its tier — 35.8% on MultiChallenge, roughly 1.8x GPT-4o mini

GPT-4.1 Mini

GPT-4.1 Mini lists multi-turn coherence for its tier — 35.8% on MultiChallenge, roughly 1.8x GPT-4o mini among its strengths; Gemini 4 Carbon does not.

Lowest cost at scale

GPT-4.1 Mini

At $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

→ GPT-4.1 Mini

At $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens it undercuts Gemini 4 Carbon, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

→ GPT-4.1 Mini

Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.

Anyone whose priority is ranked first on the artificial analysis intelligence index v5.0 with 59 at launch (artificial analysis now shows 60)

→ Gemini 4 Carbon

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens

→ GPT-4.1 Mini

That is its strongest area.

Gemini 4 Carbon: where it fits

Google's October 28, 2026 limited release for cyber defenders - top of the Artificial Analysis index at launch, priced at $2/$10 introductory, with no public API date yet. Released October 28, 2026 by Google, it is built for ranked first on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0 with 59 at launch (Artificial Analysis now shows 60), google-reported 88.2% on SEC-bench Pro and 54.8% on ExploitGym for vulnerability discovery and exploit validation, google-reported 71.0% on CWE-bench for patching, and introductory $2/$10 per million tokens, matching Gemini 4 Argon, with cached input 95% off.

Its trade-offs are real: limited release: rolling out to a subset of cyber defenders, then trusted partners via the Fairwind Program, with no date for developers or consumers, no public API model listing yet, so most users cannot call it today, introductory pricing rises to $4/$20 afterward, and Google has not said when that happens, and google has not published context or modality specs - the 1M window and modalities shown come from Artificial Analysis and Vals. At $2 in / $10 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

GPT-4.1 Mini: where it fits

A cheap, fast 1M-context workhorse with strong instruction following but weak coding — already retired from ChatGPT. Released April 14, 2025 by OpenAI, it is built for very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens, instruction following above its weight class — 84.1% on IFEval, beating GPT-4o, multi-turn coherence for its tier — 35.8% on MultiChallenge, roughly 1.8x GPT-4o mini, and a full 1M context at flat pricing, with no long-context premium.

Its trade-offs: weak at agentic coding — its 23.6% on SWE-Bench Verified sits below GPT-4o's 33.2%, retired from ChatGPT in February 2026, and OpenAI's own docs now point users to GPT-5 mini instead, and a June 2024 knowledge cutoff, now roughly two years stale, and no reasoning mode. At $0.4 in / $1.6 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-4.1 Mini overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. GPT-4.1 Mini costs less per token; GPT-4.1 Mini holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Gemini 4 Carbon for ranked first on the artificial analysis intelligence index v5.0 with 59 at launch (artificial analysis now shows 60), GPT-4.1 Mini for very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.

Want both Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-4.1 Mini without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 4 Carbon or GPT-4.1 Mini better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for Gemini 4 Carbon, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Gemini 4 Carbon leans toward ranked first on the artificial analysis intelligence index v5.0 with 59 at launch (artificial analysis now shows 60) while GPT-4.1 Mini leans toward very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Carbon or GPT-4.1 Mini?

GPT-4.1 Mini is cheaper — $2/$10 per 1M tokens vs $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens, roughly 5× apart on input.

Which has the bigger context window?

Effectively neither — 1M tokens vs 1M is a difference of a few percent. Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.

Can I use both Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-4.1 Mini together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Gemini 4 Carbon, GPT-4.1 Mini and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Gemini 4 Carbon or GPT-4.1 Mini?

Gemini 4 Carbon — released October 28, 2026, about 19 months after GPT-4.1 Mini.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.