Gemini 4 Argon vs Llama 4 Scout
Google · US | Meta · US · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick Gemini 4 Argon for 1,048,576-token unified context shared by input, thinking and output, with 'long decode' for very long responses or google-reported deepswe v1.1 of 77.9% and lvbench long-video understanding of 91.7%. Pick Llama 4 Scout for largest advertised context (10m) or open weights, single-gpu friendly. Choose Llama 4 Scout if you need self-hosting or data privacy; Gemini 4 Argon if you want a managed API.
Gemini 4 Argon (Google) and Llama 4 Scout (Meta) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Gemini 4 Argon is google's Gemini 4 Argon, broadly available October 13, 2026 - a 1M-context model at $2/$10 introductory pricing (doubling December 1). Llama 4 Scout is the 10M-token open-weight giant — enormous on paper, but usable recall is far smaller. They diverge most on price, context window and open vs. closed weights — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
- ▸Cost model: Llama 4 Scout ships open weights you can self-host (hardware cost only, no per-token fee), while Gemini 4 Argon is API-metered at $2/$10 per 1M tokens. Your choice depends on whether you want zero marginal cost at the price of running infrastructure.
- ▸Context window: Llama 4 Scout holds 9.5× more — 10M (~15,000 pages) vs 1M tokens (~1,573 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
- ▸Recency: Gemini 4 Argon is the newer model by about 19 months (released October 13, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Gemini 4 Argon | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google (US) | Meta (US) |
| Released | October 13, 2026 | April 2025 |
| Context window | 1M tokens (~1,573 pages) | 10M (~15,000 pages) |
| Price (in/out) | $2/$10 per 1M tokens | Open weight (self-host / free) |
| Open weight? | No — API only | Yes — self-hostable |
| Modalities | text, image, audio, video, code | text, image, code |
| SWE-Bench Verified | Not published | Not published |
| MRCR v2 @ 1M | Not published | 15% |
Who wins what
1,048,576-token unified context shared by input, thinking and output, with 'long decode' for very long responses
Gemini 4 Argon
Llama 4 Scout is comparatively weak here — ~15% on long-context multi-needle reasoning
Google-reported DeepSWE v1.1 of 77.9% and LVBench long-video understanding of 91.7%
Gemini 4 Argon
Google's Gemini 4 Argon, broadly available October 13, 2026 - a 1M-context model at $2/$10 introductory pricing (doubling December 1) — and it is the newer of the two.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index of 53 at high effort (AI Weekly)
Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon lists artificial Analysis Intelligence Index of 53 at high effort (AI Weekly) among its strengths; Llama 4 Scout does not.
Largest advertised context (10M)
Llama 4 Scout
Its 10M window holds about 9.5× more than Gemini 4 Argon's 1M tokens in a single prompt.
Open weights, single-GPU friendly
Llama 4 Scout
Open weights make this possible at all — Gemini 4 Argon is API-only, so it cannot leave the vendor's servers.
Self-hosted, data-private deployment
Llama 4 Scout
The 10M-token open-weight giant — enormous on paper, but usable recall is far smaller — and it carries the larger 10M context.
Lowest cost at scale
Llama 4 Scout
Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of Gemini 4 Argon's $2/$10 per 1M tokens.
Largest single-prompt input
Llama 4 Scout
Its 10M window is about 9.5× larger than Gemini 4 Argon's 1M tokens, fitting roughly 15,000 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ Llama 4 Scout
At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts Gemini 4 Argon, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ Llama 4 Scout
Larger 10M window fits more in one prompt.
A team with data-privacy or self-hosting needs
→ Llama 4 Scout
Open weights let you run it on your own hardware; Gemini 4 Argon is API-only.
Anyone whose priority is 1,048,576-token unified context shared by input, thinking and output, with 'long decode' for very long responses
→ Gemini 4 Argon
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is largest advertised context (10m)
→ Llama 4 Scout
That is its strongest area.
Gemini 4 Argon: where it fits
Google's Gemini 4 Argon, broadly available October 13, 2026 - a 1M-context model at $2/$10 introductory pricing (doubling December 1). Released October 13, 2026 by Google, it is built for 1,048,576-token unified context shared by input, thinking and output, with 'long decode' for very long responses, google-reported DeepSWE v1.1 of 77.9% and LVBench long-video understanding of 91.7%, and artificial Analysis Intelligence Index of 53 at high effort (AI Weekly).
Its trade-offs are real: introductory $2/$10 pricing ends November 30; from December 1 it doubles to $4/$20, verbose: about 62K output tokens per Artificial Analysis task, so cost per task is high, and announced September 30 for trusted cyber defenders only; broad paid-tier availability followed October 13 (not on the free tier). At $2 in / $10 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
Llama 4 Scout: where it fits
The 10M-token open-weight giant — enormous on paper, but usable recall is far smaller. Released April 2025 by Meta, it is built for largest advertised context (10M), open weights, single-GPU friendly, self-hosted, data-private deployment, and retrieval over very long inputs.
Its trade-offs: effective recall degrades far below 10M, and ~15% on long-context multi-needle reasoning. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.
The bottom line for this matchup
The defining split here is open vs. closed. Llama 4 Scout gives you weights you control — self-host it, fine-tune it, keep data in-house, pay only for hardware. Gemini 4 Argon gives you a managed, always-updated API with no infrastructure to run. Teams with GPUs, privacy requirements, or huge volume often favour the open model; teams that want zero ops and the latest capabilities favour the closed one. Capability is close enough that this operational question, not the benchmark, usually decides it.
Want both Gemini 4 Argon and Llama 4 Scout without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
See pricingFrequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon or Llama 4 Scout better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Gemini 4 Argon leans toward 1,048,576-token unified context shared by input, thinking and output, with 'long decode' for very long responses while Llama 4 Scout leans toward largest advertised context (10m), and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is open-weight, so self-hosting means no per-token fee (you pay for hardware instead), while Gemini 4 Argon is API-metered at $2/$10 per 1M tokens. For most teams without GPUs, the API model is cheaper to start; at very high volume, self-hosting can win.
Which has the bigger context window?
Llama 4 Scout — 10M vs 1M tokens, about 9.5× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Gemini 4 Argon and Llama 4 Scout together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Gemini 4 Argon, Llama 4 Scout and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Gemini 4 Argon or Llama 4 Scout?
Gemini 4 Argon — released October 13, 2026, about 19 months after Llama 4 Scout.
Related comparisons
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.