Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Google · US  |  Mistral AI · France · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro for full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1m-token window or long video and document analysis. Pick Mistral Medium 3.5 for strong intelligence-for-size — artificial analysis intelligence index 30, near the top of its price tier or 128b dense open-weight model — self-hostable. Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 if you need self-hosting or data privacy; Gemini 3.1 Pro if you want a managed API.

Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google, US) and Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI, France) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. Gemini 3.1 Pro is a 1M-token multimodal workhorse — huge breadth across text, image, audio and video, but recall fades deep in the window. Mistral Medium 3.5 is mistral's efficient 128B open-weight model — a single dense model unifying reasoning and coding that punches above its size on independent tests (AA Index 30). They diverge most on price, context window and open vs. closed weights — each quantified below from the models' real specs.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecGemini 3.1 ProMistral Medium 3.5
ProviderGoogle (US) Mistral AI (France)
ReleasedFebruary 19, 2026 April 29, 2026
Context window1M (~1,573 pages) 256K (~384 pages)
Price (in/out)$2/$12 per 1M tokens $1.5/$7.5 per 1M tokens
Open weight?No — API only Yes — self-hostable
Modalitiestext, image, audio, video, code text, image, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M26.3% Not published

Who wins what

Full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1M-token window

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Its 1M window holds about 4.1× more than Mistral Medium 3.5's 256K in a single prompt.

Long video and document analysis

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Mistral Medium 3.5 is comparatively weak here — no native video or audio

Agentic reasoning (high ARC-AGI-2)

Gemini 3.1 Pro

A 1M-token multimodal workhorse — huge breadth across text, image, audio and video, but recall fades deep in the window — and it carries the larger 1M context.

Strong intelligence-for-size — Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 30, near the top of its price tier

Mistral Medium 3.5

At $1.5/$7.5 per 1M tokens it undercuts Gemini 3.1 Pro ($2/$12 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.

128B dense open-weight model — self-hostable

Mistral Medium 3.5

Open weights make this possible at all — Gemini 3.1 Pro is API-only, so it cannot leave the vendor's servers.

Unifies reasoning and coding into one model with an adjustable reasoning effort

Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral's efficient 128B open-weight model — a single dense model unifying reasoning and coding that punches above its size on independent tests (AA Index 30) — and it runs cheaper at $1.5/$7.5 per 1M tokens.

Lowest cost at scale

Mistral Medium 3.5

At $1.5/$7.5 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.

Largest single-prompt input

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Its 1M window is about 4.1× larger than Mistral Medium 3.5's 256K, fitting roughly 1,573 pages in one prompt.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

Mistral Medium 3.5

At $1.5/$7.5 per 1M tokens it undercuts Gemini 3.1 Pro, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.

A team with data-privacy or self-hosting needs

Mistral Medium 3.5

Open weights let you run it on your own hardware; Gemini 3.1 Pro is API-only.

Anyone whose priority is full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1m-token window

Gemini 3.1 Pro

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is strong intelligence-for-size — artificial analysis intelligence index 30, near the top of its price tier

Mistral Medium 3.5

That is its strongest area.

An enterprise with regional data-residency rules

Gemini 3.1 Pro or Mistral Medium 3.5

Origin (US vs France) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.

Gemini 3.1 Pro: where it fits

A 1M-token multimodal workhorse — huge breadth across text, image, audio and video, but recall fades deep in the window. Released February 19, 2026 by Google, it is built for full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1M-token window, long video and document analysis, agentic reasoning (high ARC-AGI-2), and broad multimodal understanding across formats.

Its trade-offs are real: long-context recall drops sharply past 256K (26.3% on MRCR v2 at 1M), premium price per token at $2/$12, and superseded within Google's own line by the newer 3.5/3.6 Flash releases for cost-sensitive work. At $2 in / $12 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

Mistral Medium 3.5: where it fits

Mistral's efficient 128B open-weight model — a single dense model unifying reasoning and coding that punches above its size on independent tests (AA Index 30). Released April 29, 2026 by Mistral AI, it is built for strong intelligence-for-size — Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 30, near the top of its price tier, 128B dense open-weight model — self-hostable, unifies reasoning and coding into one model with an adjustable reasoning effort, and 256K context with text and image input.

Its trade-offs: below the absolute frontier — a value/efficiency pick, not a flagship-beater, output pricing ($7.50/M) is higher than the cheapest Chinese rivals, license framing ('open' vs enterprise) varies across sources — confirm terms for commercial use, and no native video or audio. At $1.5 in / $7.5 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

The defining split here is open vs. closed. Mistral Medium 3.5 gives you weights you control — self-host it, fine-tune it, keep data in-house, pay only for hardware. Gemini 3.1 Pro gives you a managed, always-updated API with no infrastructure to run. Teams with GPUs, privacy requirements, or huge volume often favour the open model; teams that want zero ops and the latest capabilities favour the closed one. Capability is close enough that this operational question, not the benchmark, usually decides it.

Want both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Gemini 3.1 Pro leans toward full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1m-token window while Mistral Medium 3.5 leans toward strong intelligence-for-size — artificial analysis intelligence index 30, near the top of its price tier, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is open-weight, so self-hosting means no per-token fee (you pay for hardware instead), while Gemini 3.1 Pro is API-metered at $2/$12 per 1M tokens. For most teams without GPUs, the API model is cheaper to start; at very high volume, self-hosting can win.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Pro — 1M vs 256K, about 4.1× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.

Can I use both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5 together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Gemini 3.1 Pro, Mistral Medium 3.5 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 — released April 29, 2026, about 2 months after Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.