Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Mistral Large 4

Google · US  |  Mistral AI · France · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro for full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1m-token window or long video and document analysis. Pick Mistral Large 4 for mistral's largest model to date — 1.05t total parameters, 49b active per token (granular moe), plus a 1.6b-parameter vision encoder or trained from scratch on 3,800 nvidia grace blackwell gpus in mistral's own european data centers, across 160+ languages. On a tight budget at scale, Mistral Large 4 is the value pick.

Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google, US) and Mistral Large 4 (Mistral AI, France) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. Gemini 3.1 Pro is a 1M-token multimodal workhorse — huge breadth across text, image, audio and video, but recall fades deep in the window. Mistral Large 4 is mistral's October 6, 2026 public preview of 'Le Chonk' — a 1.05T-parameter, natively multimodal MoE model with open weights planned by month's end. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecGemini 3.1 ProMistral Large 4
ProviderGoogle (US) Mistral AI (France)
ReleasedFebruary 19, 2026 October 6, 2026
Context window1M (~1,573 pages) 1M tokens (~1,500 pages)
Price (in/out)$2/$12 per 1M tokens $0.68/$2.09 per 1M tokens
Open weight?No — API only No — API only
Modalitiestext, image, audio, video, code text, image, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M26.3% Not published

Who wins what

Full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1M-token window

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro lists full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1M-token window among its strengths; Mistral Large 4 does not.

Long video and document analysis

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro lists long video and document analysis among its strengths; Mistral Large 4 does not.

Agentic reasoning (high ARC-AGI-2)

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro lists agentic reasoning (high ARC-AGI-2) among its strengths; Mistral Large 4 does not.

Mistral's largest model to date — 1.05T total parameters, 49B active per token (granular MoE), plus a 1.6B-parameter vision encoder

Mistral Large 4

Gemini 3.1 Pro is comparatively weak here — premium price per token at $2/$12

Trained from scratch on 3,800 Nvidia Grace Blackwell GPUs in Mistral's own European data centers, across 160+ languages

Mistral Large 4

Mistral's October 6, 2026 public preview of 'Le Chonk' — a 1.05T-parameter, natively multimodal MoE model with open weights planned by month's end — and it runs cheaper at $0.68/$2.09 per 1M tokens.

Hybrid instruct/reasoning design — answers quickly by default or switches into step-by-step reasoning

Mistral Large 4

Mistral's October 6, 2026 public preview of 'Le Chonk' — a 1.05T-parameter, natively multimodal MoE model with open weights planned by month's end — and it is the newer of the two.

Lowest cost at scale

Mistral Large 4

At $0.68/$2.09 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

→ Mistral Large 4

At $0.68/$2.09 per 1M tokens it undercuts Gemini 3.1 Pro, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

→ Gemini 3.1 Pro

Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.

Anyone whose priority is full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1m-token window

→ Gemini 3.1 Pro

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is mistral's largest model to date — 1.05t total parameters, 49b active per token (granular moe), plus a 1.6b-parameter vision encoder

→ Mistral Large 4

That is its strongest area.

An enterprise with regional data-residency rules

→ Gemini 3.1 Pro or Mistral Large 4

Origin (US vs France) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.

Gemini 3.1 Pro: where it fits

A 1M-token multimodal workhorse — huge breadth across text, image, audio and video, but recall fades deep in the window. Released February 19, 2026 by Google, it is built for full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1M-token window, long video and document analysis, agentic reasoning (high ARC-AGI-2), and broad multimodal understanding across formats.

Its trade-offs are real: long-context recall drops sharply past 256K (26.3% on MRCR v2 at 1M), premium price per token at $2/$12, and superseded within Google's own line by the newer 3.5/3.6 Flash releases for cost-sensitive work. At $2 in / $12 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

Mistral Large 4: where it fits

Mistral's October 6, 2026 public preview of 'Le Chonk' — a 1.05T-parameter, natively multimodal MoE model with open weights planned by month's end. Released October 6, 2026 by Mistral AI, it is built for mistral's largest model to date — 1.05T total parameters, 49B active per token (granular MoE), plus a 1.6B-parameter vision encoder, trained from scratch on 3,800 Nvidia Grace Blackwell GPUs in Mistral's own European data centers, across 160+ languages, hybrid instruct/reasoning design — answers quickly by default or switches into step-by-step reasoning, and open weights planned by end of October 2026, which would make it among the largest open-weight models available.

Its trade-offs: still a public preview, not a finished release — Mistral says training is ongoing with 'no signs of saturation', weights not yet shipped as of mid-October 2026 — API-only for now despite the open-weight framing, launch pricing ($0.68/$2.09 per million) is a preview discount — Mistral's own model page lists a $1.36/$4.18 list price once the promotion ends, and scores 61.7% on DeepSWE v1.1, trailing DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (74.2%) and Kimi K3 (68.0%) on that coding benchmark. At $0.68 in / $2.09 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

This is less "which is smarter" and more "which ecosystem fits." Gemini 3.1 Pro (US) and Mistral Large 4 (France) differ on pricing philosophy, data-residency, and tooling as much as on raw scores. Mistral Large 4 is the cheaper option, which matters at volume. The pragmatic move is to run one real task through both and judge the outputs against your own constraints — including where your data is allowed to be processed.

Want both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Mistral Large 4 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro or Mistral Large 4 better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Gemini 3.1 Pro leans toward full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1m-token window while Mistral Large 4 leans toward mistral's largest model to date — 1.05t total parameters, 49b active per token (granular moe), plus a 1.6b-parameter vision encoder, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4 is cheaper — $2/$12 per 1M tokens vs $0.68/$2.09 per 1M tokens, roughly 2.9× apart on input.

Which has the bigger context window?

Effectively neither — 1M vs 1M tokens is a difference of a few percent. Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.

Can I use both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Mistral Large 4 together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Gemini 3.1 Pro, Mistral Large 4 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4 — released October 6, 2026, about 8 months after Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.