Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro for full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1m-token window or long video and document analysis. Pick Mercury 2.5 Preview for very high inference throughput (1,107 tok/s) via diffusion-based parallel token generation or coding accuracy (95.7%, 91st percentile among cost-optimized models). On a tight budget at scale, Mercury 2.5 Preview is the value pick.
Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google) and Mercury 2.5 Preview (Inception Labs) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Gemini 3.1 Pro is a 1M-token multimodal workhorse — huge breadth across text, image, audio and video, but recall fades deep in the window. Mercury 2.5 Preview is inception Labs' August 31, 2026 diffusion-based language model preview, refining tokens in parallel for roughly 10x the throughput of comparable autoregressive models at cost-optimized-tier quality. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences
Price: Mercury 2.5 Preview is about 50× cheaper on input ($0.04/$0.15 per 1M tokens vs $2/$12 per 1M tokens) — a large enough gap that at scale it can be the single biggest line item in the decision.
Context window: Gemini 3.1 Pro holds 4× more — 1M (~1,573 pages) vs 260K tokens (~390 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
Recency: Mercury 2.5 Preview is the newer model by about 6 months (released August 31, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Specifications
Spec
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Mercury 2.5 Preview
Provider
Google (US)
Inception Labs (US)
Released
February 19, 2026
August 31, 2026
Context window
1M (~1,573 pages)
260K tokens (~390 pages)
Price (in/out)
$2/$12 per 1M tokens
$0.04/$0.15 per 1M tokens
Open weight?
No — API only
No — API only
Modalities
text, image, audio, video, code
text
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
26.3%
Not published
Who wins what
Full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1M-token window: Gemini 3.1 Pro — Its 1M window holds about 4× more than Mercury 2.5 Preview's 260K tokens in a single prompt.
Long video and document analysis: Gemini 3.1 Pro — A 1M-token multimodal workhorse — huge breadth across text, image, audio and video, but recall fades deep in the window — and it carries the larger 1M context.
Agentic reasoning (high ARC-AGI-2): Gemini 3.1 Pro — Gemini 3.1 Pro lists agentic reasoning (high ARC-AGI-2) among its strengths; Mercury 2.5 Preview does not.
Very high inference throughput (1,107 tok/s) via diffusion-based parallel token generation: Mercury 2.5 Preview — Gemini 3.1 Pro is comparatively weak here — premium price per token at $2/$12
Coding accuracy (95.7%, 91st percentile among cost-optimized models): Mercury 2.5 Preview — At $0.04/$0.15 per 1M tokens it undercuts Gemini 3.1 Pro ($2/$12 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.
Mathematics accuracy (97.0%, 97th percentile): Mercury 2.5 Preview — Inception Labs' August 31, 2026 diffusion-based language model preview, refining tokens in parallel for roughly 10x the throughput of comparable autoregressive models at cost-optimized-tier quality — and it runs cheaper at $0.04/$0.15 per 1M tokens.
Lowest cost at scale: Mercury 2.5 Preview — At $0.04/$0.15 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Largest single-prompt input: Gemini 3.1 Pro — Its 1M window is about 4× larger than Mercury 2.5 Preview's 260K tokens, fitting roughly 1,573 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume: Mercury 2.5 Preview — At $0.04/$0.15 per 1M tokens it undercuts Gemini 3.1 Pro, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases: Gemini 3.1 Pro — Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1m-token window: Gemini 3.1 Pro — It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is very high inference throughput (1,107 tok/s) via diffusion-based parallel token generation: Mercury 2.5 Preview — That is its strongest area.
Gemini 3.1 Pro: where it fits
A 1M-token multimodal workhorse — huge breadth across text, image, audio and video, but recall fades deep in the window. Released February 19, 2026 by Google, it is built for full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1M-token window, long video and document analysis, agentic reasoning (high ARC-AGI-2), and broad multimodal understanding across formats.
Its trade-offs are real: long-context recall drops sharply past 256K (26.3% on MRCR v2 at 1M), premium price per token at $2/$12, and superseded within Google's own line by the newer 3.5/3.6 Flash releases for cost-sensitive work. At $2 in / $12 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
Mercury 2.5 Preview: where it fits
Inception Labs' August 31, 2026 diffusion-based language model preview, refining tokens in parallel for roughly 10x the throughput of comparable autoregressive models at cost-optimized-tier quality. Released August 31, 2026 by Inception Labs, it is built for very high inference throughput (1,107 tok/s) via diffusion-based parallel token generation, coding accuracy (95.7%, 91st percentile among cost-optimized models), mathematics accuracy (97.0%, 97th percentile), and tunable reasoning levels with parallel tool calls and schema-aligned JSON output.
Its trade-offs: 260K context window is far shorter than frontier 1M-token models, no vision or audio modalities, positioned only against cost-optimized models (GPT-5.6 Luna Low, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite), not frontier-class, and current $0.04/$0.15 pricing includes a limited-time launch promotion on OpenRouter (list price is $0.20/$0.75, may rise after Sept 8, 2026). At $0.04 in / $0.15 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
Gemini 3.1 Pro and Mercury 2.5 Preview overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. Mercury 2.5 Preview costs less per token; Gemini 3.1 Pro holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Gemini 3.1 Pro for full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1m-token window, Mercury 2.5 Preview for very high inference throughput (1,107 tok/s) via diffusion-based parallel token generation. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro or Mercury 2.5 Preview better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Gemini 3.1 Pro leans toward full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1m-token window while Mercury 2.5 Preview leans toward very high inference throughput (1,107 tok/s) via diffusion-based parallel token generation, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Mercury 2.5 Preview?
Mercury 2.5 Preview is cheaper — $2/$12 per 1M tokens vs $0.04/$0.15 per 1M tokens, roughly 50× apart on input.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Pro — 1M vs 260K tokens, about 4× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Mercury 2.5 Preview together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Gemini 3.1 Pro, Mercury 2.5 Preview and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Mercury 2.5 Preview?
Mercury 2.5 Preview — released August 31, 2026, about 6 months after Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Mercury 2.5 Preview
Google · US | Inception Labs · US · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro for full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1m-token window or long video and document analysis. Pick Mercury 2.5 Preview for very high inference throughput (1,107 tok/s) via diffusion-based parallel token generation or coding accuracy (95.7%, 91st percentile among cost-optimized models). On a tight budget at scale, Mercury 2.5 Preview is the value pick.
Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google) and Mercury 2.5 Preview (Inception Labs) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Gemini 3.1 Pro is a 1M-token multimodal workhorse — huge breadth across text, image, audio and video, but recall fades deep in the window. Mercury 2.5 Preview is inception Labs' August 31, 2026 diffusion-based language model preview, refining tokens in parallel for roughly 10x the throughput of comparable autoregressive models at cost-optimized-tier quality. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
▸Price: Mercury 2.5 Preview is about 50× cheaper on input ($0.04/$0.15 per 1M tokens vs $2/$12 per 1M tokens) — a large enough gap that at scale it can be the single biggest line item in the decision.
▸Context window: Gemini 3.1 Pro holds 4× more — 1M (~1,573 pages) vs 260K tokens (~390 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
▸Recency: Mercury 2.5 Preview is the newer model by about 6 months (released August 31, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
Spec
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Mercury 2.5 Preview
Provider
Google (US)
Inception Labs (US)
Released
February 19, 2026
August 31, 2026
Context window
1M (~1,573 pages)
260K tokens (~390 pages)
Price (in/out)
$2/$12 per 1M tokens
$0.04/$0.15 per 1M tokens
Open weight?
No — API only
No — API only
Modalities
text, image, audio, video, code
text
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
26.3%
Not published
Who wins what
Full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1M-token window
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Its 1M window holds about 4× more than Mercury 2.5 Preview's 260K tokens in a single prompt.
Long video and document analysis
Gemini 3.1 Pro
A 1M-token multimodal workhorse — huge breadth across text, image, audio and video, but recall fades deep in the window — and it carries the larger 1M context.
Agentic reasoning (high ARC-AGI-2)
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro lists agentic reasoning (high ARC-AGI-2) among its strengths; Mercury 2.5 Preview does not.
Very high inference throughput (1,107 tok/s) via diffusion-based parallel token generation
Mercury 2.5 Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro is comparatively weak here — premium price per token at $2/$12
Coding accuracy (95.7%, 91st percentile among cost-optimized models)
Mercury 2.5 Preview
At $0.04/$0.15 per 1M tokens it undercuts Gemini 3.1 Pro ($2/$12 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.
Mathematics accuracy (97.0%, 97th percentile)
Mercury 2.5 Preview
Inception Labs' August 31, 2026 diffusion-based language model preview, refining tokens in parallel for roughly 10x the throughput of comparable autoregressive models at cost-optimized-tier quality — and it runs cheaper at $0.04/$0.15 per 1M tokens.
Lowest cost at scale
Mercury 2.5 Preview
At $0.04/$0.15 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Largest single-prompt input
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Its 1M window is about 4× larger than Mercury 2.5 Preview's 260K tokens, fitting roughly 1,573 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ Mercury 2.5 Preview
At $0.04/$0.15 per 1M tokens it undercuts Gemini 3.1 Pro, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ Gemini 3.1 Pro
Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1m-token window
→ Gemini 3.1 Pro
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is very high inference throughput (1,107 tok/s) via diffusion-based parallel token generation
→ Mercury 2.5 Preview
That is its strongest area.
Gemini 3.1 Pro: where it fits
A 1M-token multimodal workhorse — huge breadth across text, image, audio and video, but recall fades deep in the window. Released February 19, 2026 by Google, it is built for full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1M-token window, long video and document analysis, agentic reasoning (high ARC-AGI-2), and broad multimodal understanding across formats.
Its trade-offs are real: long-context recall drops sharply past 256K (26.3% on MRCR v2 at 1M), premium price per token at $2/$12, and superseded within Google's own line by the newer 3.5/3.6 Flash releases for cost-sensitive work. At $2 in / $12 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
Mercury 2.5 Preview: where it fits
Inception Labs' August 31, 2026 diffusion-based language model preview, refining tokens in parallel for roughly 10x the throughput of comparable autoregressive models at cost-optimized-tier quality. Released August 31, 2026 by Inception Labs, it is built for very high inference throughput (1,107 tok/s) via diffusion-based parallel token generation, coding accuracy (95.7%, 91st percentile among cost-optimized models), mathematics accuracy (97.0%, 97th percentile), and tunable reasoning levels with parallel tool calls and schema-aligned JSON output.
Its trade-offs: 260K context window is far shorter than frontier 1M-token models, no vision or audio modalities, positioned only against cost-optimized models (GPT-5.6 Luna Low, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite), not frontier-class, and current $0.04/$0.15 pricing includes a limited-time launch promotion on OpenRouter (list price is $0.20/$0.75, may rise after Sept 8, 2026). At $0.04 in / $0.15 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
Gemini 3.1 Pro and Mercury 2.5 Preview overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. Mercury 2.5 Preview costs less per token; Gemini 3.1 Pro holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Gemini 3.1 Pro for full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1m-token window, Mercury 2.5 Preview for very high inference throughput (1,107 tok/s) via diffusion-based parallel token generation. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Want both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Mercury 2.5 Preview without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro or Mercury 2.5 Preview better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Gemini 3.1 Pro leans toward full multimodal input — text, image, audio and video in one 1m-token window while Mercury 2.5 Preview leans toward very high inference throughput (1,107 tok/s) via diffusion-based parallel token generation, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Mercury 2.5 Preview?
Mercury 2.5 Preview is cheaper — $2/$12 per 1M tokens vs $0.04/$0.15 per 1M tokens, roughly 50× apart on input.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Pro — 1M vs 260K tokens, about 4× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Mercury 2.5 Preview together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Gemini 3.1 Pro, Mercury 2.5 Preview and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Mercury 2.5 Preview?
Mercury 2.5 Preview — released August 31, 2026, about 6 months after Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.