Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro for largest mainstream production context (2m) or long video and document analysis. Pick Hunyuan Hy3 for frontier-level reported reasoning and science (gpqa diamond 90.4) at low active-parameter cost or runs a 295b model at the cost of a 21b — only 21b parameters active per token. Choose Hunyuan Hy3 if you need self-hosting or data privacy; Gemini 3.1 Pro if you want a managed API.
Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google, US) and Hunyuan Hy3 (Tencent, China) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. Gemini 3.1 Pro is a 2M-token multimodal workhorse — huge breadth, but recall fades deep in the window. Hunyuan Hy3 is a 295B Apache-2.0 open MoE that reaches frontier reasoning quality while running at roughly 21B active-parameter cost. They diverge most on price, context window and open vs. closed weights — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences
Cost model: Hunyuan Hy3 ships open weights you can self-host (hardware cost only, no per-token fee), while Gemini 3.1 Pro is API-metered at $2/$12 per 1M tokens. Your choice depends on whether you want zero marginal cost at the price of running infrastructure.
Context window: Gemini 3.1 Pro holds 7.8× more — 2M (~3,000 pages) vs 256K (~384 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
Recency: Hunyuan Hy3 is the newer model by about 5 months (released July 6, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Ecosystem: this is a US-vs-China matchup — they differ in pricing philosophy, data-residency options, and tooling ecosystems, not only benchmarks.
Specifications
Spec
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Hunyuan Hy3
Provider
Google (US)
Tencent (China)
Released
February 19, 2026
July 6, 2026
Context window
2M (~3,000 pages)
256K (~384 pages)
Price (in/out)
$2/$12 per 1M tokens
Open weight (self-host / free)
Open weight?
No — API only
Yes — self-hostable
Modalities
text, image, audio, video, code
text, code
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
26.3%
Not published
Who wins what
Largest mainstream production context (2M): Gemini 3.1 Pro — A core design strength of Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Long video and document analysis: Gemini 3.1 Pro — A core design strength of Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Agentic reasoning (high ARC-AGI-2): Gemini 3.1 Pro — A core design strength of Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Frontier-level reported reasoning and science (GPQA Diamond 90.4) at low active-parameter cost: Hunyuan Hy3 — A core design strength of Hunyuan Hy3.
Runs a 295B model at the cost of a 21B — only 21B parameters active per token: Hunyuan Hy3 — A core design strength of Hunyuan Hy3.
Clean, unrestricted Apache-2.0 license with no geographic carve-out: Hunyuan Hy3 — A core design strength of Hunyuan Hy3.
Lowest cost at scale: Hunyuan Hy3 — At Open weight (self-host / free), it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Largest single-prompt input: Gemini 3.1 Pro — Its 2M window is about 7.8× larger, fitting roughly 3,000 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume: Hunyuan Hy3 — At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts Gemini 3.1 Pro, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases: Gemini 3.1 Pro — Larger 2M window fits more in one prompt.
A team with data-privacy or self-hosting needs: Hunyuan Hy3 — Open weights let you run it on your own hardware; Gemini 3.1 Pro is API-only.
Anyone whose priority is largest mainstream production context (2m): Gemini 3.1 Pro — It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is frontier-level reported reasoning and science (gpqa diamond 90.4) at low active-parameter cost: Hunyuan Hy3 — That is its strongest area.
An enterprise with regional data-residency rules: Gemini 3.1 Pro or Hunyuan Hy3 — Origin (US vs China) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.
Gemini 3.1 Pro: where it fits
A 2M-token multimodal workhorse — huge breadth, but recall fades deep in the window. Released February 19, 2026 by Google, it is built for largest mainstream production context (2M), long video and document analysis, agentic reasoning (high ARC-AGI-2), and multimodal understanding.
Its trade-offs are real: long-context recall drops sharply past 256K, and premium price per token. At $2 in / $12 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
Hunyuan Hy3: where it fits
A 295B Apache-2.0 open MoE that reaches frontier reasoning quality while running at roughly 21B active-parameter cost. Released July 6, 2026 by Tencent, it is built for frontier-level reported reasoning and science (GPQA Diamond 90.4) at low active-parameter cost, runs a 295B model at the cost of a 21B — only 21B parameters active per token, clean, unrestricted Apache-2.0 license with no geographic carve-out, and broad day-one ecosystem support plus an FP8 checkpoint.
Its trade-offs: benchmarks are largely self-reported, and the ultra-low hosted pricing is a limited promotion, and the hosted API is China-jurisdiction, and self-hosting a 295B MoE still needs serious hardware. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.
The bottom line for this matchup
The defining split here is open vs. closed. Hunyuan Hy3 gives you weights you control — self-host it, fine-tune it, keep data in-house, pay only for hardware. Gemini 3.1 Pro gives you a managed, always-updated API with no infrastructure to run. Teams with GPUs, privacy requirements, or huge volume often favour the open model; teams that want zero ops and the latest capabilities favour the closed one. Capability is close enough that this operational question, not the benchmark, usually decides it.
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro or Hunyuan Hy3 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Gemini 3.1 Pro leans toward largest mainstream production context (2m) while Hunyuan Hy3 leans toward frontier-level reported reasoning and science (gpqa diamond 90.4) at low active-parameter cost, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Hunyuan Hy3?
Hunyuan Hy3 is open-weight, so self-hosting means no per-token fee (you pay for hardware instead), while Gemini 3.1 Pro is API-metered at $2/$12 per 1M tokens. For most teams without GPUs, the API model is cheaper to start; at very high volume, self-hosting can win.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Pro — 2M vs 256K, about 7.8× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Hunyuan Hy3 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Gemini 3.1 Pro, Hunyuan Hy3 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Hunyuan Hy3?
Hunyuan Hy3 — released July 6, 2026, about 5 months after Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Hunyuan Hy3
Google · US | Tencent · China · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro for largest mainstream production context (2m) or long video and document analysis. Pick Hunyuan Hy3 for frontier-level reported reasoning and science (gpqa diamond 90.4) at low active-parameter cost or runs a 295b model at the cost of a 21b — only 21b parameters active per token. Choose Hunyuan Hy3 if you need self-hosting or data privacy; Gemini 3.1 Pro if you want a managed API.
Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google, US) and Hunyuan Hy3 (Tencent, China) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. Gemini 3.1 Pro is a 2M-token multimodal workhorse — huge breadth, but recall fades deep in the window. Hunyuan Hy3 is a 295B Apache-2.0 open MoE that reaches frontier reasoning quality while running at roughly 21B active-parameter cost. They diverge most on price, context window and open vs. closed weights — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
▸Cost model: Hunyuan Hy3 ships open weights you can self-host (hardware cost only, no per-token fee), while Gemini 3.1 Pro is API-metered at $2/$12 per 1M tokens. Your choice depends on whether you want zero marginal cost at the price of running infrastructure.
▸Context window: Gemini 3.1 Pro holds 7.8× more — 2M (~3,000 pages) vs 256K (~384 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
▸Recency: Hunyuan Hy3 is the newer model by about 5 months (released July 6, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
▸Ecosystem: this is a US-vs-China matchup — they differ in pricing philosophy, data-residency options, and tooling ecosystems, not only benchmarks.
Side-by-side specs
Spec
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Hunyuan Hy3
Provider
Google (US)
Tencent (China)
Released
February 19, 2026
July 6, 2026
Context window
2M (~3,000 pages)
256K (~384 pages)
Price (in/out)
$2/$12 per 1M tokens
Open weight (self-host / free)
Open weight?
No — API only
Yes — self-hostable
Modalities
text, image, audio, video, code
text, code
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
26.3%
Not published
Who wins what
Largest mainstream production context (2M)
Gemini 3.1 Pro
A core design strength of Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Long video and document analysis
Gemini 3.1 Pro
A core design strength of Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Agentic reasoning (high ARC-AGI-2)
Gemini 3.1 Pro
A core design strength of Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Frontier-level reported reasoning and science (GPQA Diamond 90.4) at low active-parameter cost
Hunyuan Hy3
A core design strength of Hunyuan Hy3.
Runs a 295B model at the cost of a 21B — only 21B parameters active per token
Hunyuan Hy3
A core design strength of Hunyuan Hy3.
Clean, unrestricted Apache-2.0 license with no geographic carve-out
Hunyuan Hy3
A core design strength of Hunyuan Hy3.
Lowest cost at scale
Hunyuan Hy3
At Open weight (self-host / free), it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Largest single-prompt input
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Its 2M window is about 7.8× larger, fitting roughly 3,000 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ Hunyuan Hy3
At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts Gemini 3.1 Pro, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ Gemini 3.1 Pro
Larger 2M window fits more in one prompt.
A team with data-privacy or self-hosting needs
→ Hunyuan Hy3
Open weights let you run it on your own hardware; Gemini 3.1 Pro is API-only.
Anyone whose priority is largest mainstream production context (2m)
→ Gemini 3.1 Pro
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is frontier-level reported reasoning and science (gpqa diamond 90.4) at low active-parameter cost
→ Hunyuan Hy3
That is its strongest area.
An enterprise with regional data-residency rules
→ Gemini 3.1 Pro or Hunyuan Hy3
Origin (US vs China) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.
Gemini 3.1 Pro: where it fits
A 2M-token multimodal workhorse — huge breadth, but recall fades deep in the window. Released February 19, 2026 by Google, it is built for largest mainstream production context (2M), long video and document analysis, agentic reasoning (high ARC-AGI-2), and multimodal understanding.
Its trade-offs are real: long-context recall drops sharply past 256K, and premium price per token. At $2 in / $12 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
Hunyuan Hy3: where it fits
A 295B Apache-2.0 open MoE that reaches frontier reasoning quality while running at roughly 21B active-parameter cost. Released July 6, 2026 by Tencent, it is built for frontier-level reported reasoning and science (GPQA Diamond 90.4) at low active-parameter cost, runs a 295B model at the cost of a 21B — only 21B parameters active per token, clean, unrestricted Apache-2.0 license with no geographic carve-out, and broad day-one ecosystem support plus an FP8 checkpoint.
Its trade-offs: benchmarks are largely self-reported, and the ultra-low hosted pricing is a limited promotion, and the hosted API is China-jurisdiction, and self-hosting a 295B MoE still needs serious hardware. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.
The bottom line for this matchup
The defining split here is open vs. closed. Hunyuan Hy3 gives you weights you control — self-host it, fine-tune it, keep data in-house, pay only for hardware. Gemini 3.1 Pro gives you a managed, always-updated API with no infrastructure to run. Teams with GPUs, privacy requirements, or huge volume often favour the open model; teams that want zero ops and the latest capabilities favour the closed one. Capability is close enough that this operational question, not the benchmark, usually decides it.
Want both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Hunyuan Hy3 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro or Hunyuan Hy3 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Gemini 3.1 Pro leans toward largest mainstream production context (2m) while Hunyuan Hy3 leans toward frontier-level reported reasoning and science (gpqa diamond 90.4) at low active-parameter cost, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Hunyuan Hy3?
Hunyuan Hy3 is open-weight, so self-hosting means no per-token fee (you pay for hardware instead), while Gemini 3.1 Pro is API-metered at $2/$12 per 1M tokens. For most teams without GPUs, the API model is cheaper to start; at very high volume, self-hosting can win.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Pro — 2M vs 256K, about 7.8× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Hunyuan Hy3 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Gemini 3.1 Pro, Hunyuan Hy3 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Hunyuan Hy3?
Hunyuan Hy3 — released July 6, 2026, about 5 months after Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.