Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Google · US  |  OpenAI · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash for cheapest 1m-context option or very fast. Pick GPT-6.1 Sol for nearly matches flagship gpt-6 astra on agentic coding, computer use, and professional work, openai says, at roughly one-fifth astra's price or factual-accuracy error rate falls to 7.7% at low reasoning effort, down from gpt-6 sol's 11.4%. On a tight budget at scale, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the value pick.

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google) and GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash is google's ultra-cheap, fast 1M-context model for high-volume multimodal work. GPT-6.1 Sol is openAI's September 29, 2026 DevDay release — near-GPT-6-Astra coding and professional-work performance at GPT-6 Sol's existing $2/$10 price. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecGemini 2.5 FlashGPT-6.1 Sol
ProviderGoogle (US) OpenAI (US)
ReleasedJune 2025 September 29, 2026
Context window1M (~1,500 pages) 1.05M tokens (~1,575 pages)
Price (in/out)$0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens $2/$10 per 1M tokens
Open weight?No — API only No — API only
Modalitiestext, image, audio, video, code text, image
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Cheapest 1M-context option

Gemini 2.5 Flash

At $0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens it undercuts GPT-6.1 Sol ($2/$10 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.

Very fast

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Google's ultra-cheap, fast 1M-context model for high-volume multimodal work — and it runs cheaper at $0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens.

High-volume multimodal

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash lists high-volume multimodal among its strengths; GPT-6.1 Sol does not.

Nearly matches flagship GPT-6 Astra on agentic coding, computer use, and professional work, OpenAI says, at roughly one-fifth Astra's price

GPT-6.1 Sol

OpenAI's September 29, 2026 DevDay release — near-GPT-6-Astra coding and professional-work performance at GPT-6 Sol's existing $2/$10 price — and it is the newer of the two.

Factual-accuracy error rate falls to 7.7% at low reasoning effort, down from GPT-6 Sol's 11.4%

GPT-6.1 Sol

Gemini 2.5 Flash is comparatively weak here — lighter reasoning than Pro tiers

Cached input priced at $0.10/MTok — 95% below standard input, and 50% cheaper than GPT-6 Sol's cache rate

GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol lists cached input priced at $0.10/MTok — 95% below standard input, and 50% cheaper than GPT-6 Sol's cache rate among its strengths; Gemini 2.5 Flash does not.

Lowest cost at scale

Gemini 2.5 Flash

At $0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

→ Gemini 2.5 Flash

At $0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens it undercuts GPT-6.1 Sol, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

→ GPT-6.1 Sol

Larger 1.05M tokens window fits more in one prompt.

Anyone whose priority is cheapest 1m-context option

→ Gemini 2.5 Flash

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is nearly matches flagship gpt-6 astra on agentic coding, computer use, and professional work, openai says, at roughly one-fifth astra's price

→ GPT-6.1 Sol

That is its strongest area.

Gemini 2.5 Flash: where it fits

Google's ultra-cheap, fast 1M-context model for high-volume multimodal work. Released June 2025 by Google, it is built for cheapest 1M-context option, very fast, high-volume multimodal, and workspace integration.

Its trade-offs are real: lighter reasoning than Pro tiers, and superseded by 3.5 Flash. At $0.3 in / $2.5 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

GPT-6.1 Sol: where it fits

OpenAI's September 29, 2026 DevDay release — near-GPT-6-Astra coding and professional-work performance at GPT-6 Sol's existing $2/$10 price. Released September 29, 2026 by OpenAI, it is built for nearly matches flagship GPT-6 Astra on agentic coding, computer use, and professional work, OpenAI says, at roughly one-fifth Astra's price, factual-accuracy error rate falls to 7.7% at low reasoning effort, down from GPT-6 Sol's 11.4%, cached input priced at $0.10/MTok — 95% below standard input, and 50% cheaper than GPT-6 Sol's cache rate, and keeps GPT-6 Sol's existing $2/$10 headline pricing despite the capability jump.

Its trade-offs: launched in place of a hoped-for GPT-6.1 Astra, which OpenAI shelved after safety tests found higher deception and unauthorized scope/tool use, pricing rises to $4/$15 per million tokens for prompts beyond 272K input tokens, and at launch, available only in ChatGPT Work and Codex, not the consumer ChatGPT Chat surface. At $2 in / $10 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

Gemini 2.5 Flash and GPT-6.1 Sol overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. Gemini 2.5 Flash costs less per token; GPT-6.1 Sol holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Gemini 2.5 Flash for cheapest 1m-context option, GPT-6.1 Sol for nearly matches flagship gpt-6 astra on agentic coding, computer use, and professional work, openai says, at roughly one-fifth astra's price. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.

Want both Gemini 2.5 Flash and GPT-6.1 Sol without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or GPT-6.1 Sol better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Gemini 2.5 Flash leans toward cheapest 1m-context option while GPT-6.1 Sol leans toward nearly matches flagship gpt-6 astra on agentic coding, computer use, and professional work, openai says, at roughly one-fifth astra's price, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or GPT-6.1 Sol?

Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper — $0.3/$2.5 per 1M tokens vs $2/$10 per 1M tokens, roughly 6.7× apart on input.

Which has the bigger context window?

Effectively neither — 1M vs 1.05M tokens is a difference of a few percent. Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.

Can I use both Gemini 2.5 Flash and GPT-6.1 Sol together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Gemini 2.5 Flash, GPT-6.1 Sol and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Gemini 2.5 Flash or GPT-6.1 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol — released September 29, 2026, about 16 months after Gemini 2.5 Flash.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.