DeepSeek V4 vs North Mini Code
DeepSeek · China | Cohere · Canada · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 for near-frontier coding at ~1/12 the cost or open mit-licensed weights you can self-host. Pick North Mini Code for agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks or efficient sparse moe — 3b active of 30b, runs on a single h100. On a tight budget at scale, North Mini Code is the value pick.
DeepSeek V4 (DeepSeek, China) and North Mini Code (Cohere, Canada) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. DeepSeek V4 is china's open-weight price earthquake — near-frontier capability at roughly a twelfth of GPT-5.5's cost. North Mini Code is cohere's first agentic coding model: an open-weight 30B/3B-active MoE built for real software-engineering and terminal tasks that runs on a single H100. They diverge most on price, context window and coding benchmarks — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
- ▸Context window: DeepSeek V4 holds 3.9× more — 1M (~1,500 pages) vs 256K (~384 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
- ▸Coding: DeepSeek V4 leads SWE-Bench Verified by 13.0 points (80.6% vs 67.6%) — a real edge on hard, real-world software tasks.
- ▸Recency: North Mini Code is the newer model by about 46 days (released June 9, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
- ▸Ecosystem: this is a China-vs-Canada matchup — they differ in pricing philosophy, data-residency options, and tooling ecosystems, not only benchmarks.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | DeepSeek V4 | North Mini Code |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek (China) | Cohere (Canada) |
| Released | April 24, 2026 | June 9, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M (~1,500 pages) | 256K (~384 pages) |
| Price (in/out) | $0.66/$1.98 per 1M tokens | Open weight (self-host / free) |
| Open weight? | Yes — self-hostable | Yes — self-hostable |
| Modalities | text, code | text, code |
| SWE-Bench Verified | 80.6% | 67.6% |
| MRCR v2 @ 1M | Not published | Not published |
Who wins what
Near-frontier coding at ~1/12 the cost
DeepSeek V4
It scores 80.6% on SWE-Bench Verified against North Mini Code's 67.6% — a 13-point edge on real repository work.
Open MIT-licensed weights you can self-host
DeepSeek V4
China's open-weight price earthquake — near-frontier capability at roughly a twelfth of GPT-5.5's cost — and it leads SWE-Bench Verified 80.6% to 67.6%.
No long-context surcharge
DeepSeek V4
Its 1M window holds about 3.9× more than North Mini Code's 256K in a single prompt.
Agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks
North Mini Code
DeepSeek V4 is comparatively weak here — trails the very best on hardest agentic coding
Efficient sparse MoE — 3B active of 30B, runs on a single H100
North Mini Code
Cohere's first agentic coding model: an open-weight 30B/3B-active MoE built for real software-engineering and terminal tasks that runs on a single H100 — and it is the newer of the two.
High throughput (up to 2.8x Devstral Small 2) at low latency
North Mini Code
North Mini Code lists high throughput (up to 2.8x Devstral Small 2) at low latency among its strengths; DeepSeek V4 does not.
Lowest cost at scale
North Mini Code
Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of DeepSeek V4's $0.66/$1.98 per 1M tokens.
Largest single-prompt input
DeepSeek V4
Its 1M window is about 3.9× larger than North Mini Code's 256K, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ North Mini Code
At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts DeepSeek V4, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ DeepSeek V4
Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is near-frontier coding at ~1/12 the cost
→ DeepSeek V4
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks
→ North Mini Code
That is its strongest area.
An enterprise with regional data-residency rules
→ North Mini Code or DeepSeek V4
Origin (China vs Canada) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.
DeepSeek V4: where it fits
China's open-weight price earthquake — near-frontier capability at roughly a twelfth of GPT-5.5's cost. Released April 24, 2026 by DeepSeek, it is built for near-frontier coding at ~1/12 the cost, open MIT-licensed weights you can self-host, no long-context surcharge, and highest LiveCodeBench result.
Its trade-offs are real: this generic 'V4' entry mirrors DeepSeek V4-Pro's specs - see DeepSeek V4-Pro and DeepSeek V4-Flash for DeepSeek's actual named product tiers, trails the very best on hardest agentic coding, and text/code focused, less multimodal. At $0.66 in / $1.98 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
North Mini Code: where it fits
Cohere's first agentic coding model: an open-weight 30B/3B-active MoE built for real software-engineering and terminal tasks that runs on a single H100. Released June 9, 2026 by Cohere, it is built for agentic software engineering, code generation, and terminal tasks, efficient sparse MoE — 3B active of 30B, runs on a single H100, high throughput (up to 2.8x Devstral Small 2) at low latency, and fully open weights under Apache 2.0 with fp8 and 4-bit builds.
Its trade-offs: text-only and coding-specialized — not multimodal or general-purpose, and 256K context and modest general-intelligence index trail frontier models. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.
The bottom line for this matchup
This is less "which is smarter" and more "which ecosystem fits." DeepSeek V4 (China) and North Mini Code (Canada) differ on pricing philosophy, data-residency, and tooling as much as on raw scores. North Mini Code is the cheaper option, which matters at volume. The pragmatic move is to run one real task through both and judge the outputs against your own constraints — including where your data is allowed to be processed.
Want both DeepSeek V4 and North Mini Code without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
See pricingFrequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek V4 or North Mini Code better for coding?
On SWE-Bench Verified, DeepSeek V4 scores 80.6% and North Mini Code scores 67.6% — DeepSeek V4 has the measurable edge.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 or North Mini Code?
North Mini Code is cheaper — $0.66/$1.98 per 1M tokens vs Open weight (self-host / free).
Which has the bigger context window?
DeepSeek V4 — 1M vs 256K, about 3.9× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both DeepSeek V4 and North Mini Code together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you DeepSeek V4, North Mini Code and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, DeepSeek V4 or North Mini Code?
North Mini Code — released June 9, 2026, about 46 days after DeepSeek V4.
Related comparisons
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.