DeepSeek V4-Pro vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra

DeepSeek · China  |  NVIDIA · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick DeepSeek V4-Pro for open-weight 1.6t moe (~49b active) — deepseek's largest, self-hostable or 1m-token context with up to 384k output tokens. Pick NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra for the most capable open-weight model from a us lab (artificial analysis intelligence index of about 48) or fast, efficient long-horizon agentic reasoning via a hybrid mamba-transformer design. On a tight budget at scale, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is the value pick.

DeepSeek V4-Pro (DeepSeek, China) and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra (NVIDIA, US) line up two different AI ecosystems against each other — a comparison that is as much about cost philosophy and openness as raw capability. DeepSeek V4-Pro is deepSeek's 1.6-trillion-parameter open-weight model at $0.435/$0.87 — strong open-weight coding and a 1M context at a fraction of flagship prices. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is nVIDIA's open-weight reasoning flagship (about 550B total, 55B active) — the most capable open model from a US lab, built for long-running agents. Their biggest split is price, and the breakdown below shows exactly how that plays out for your workload.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecDeepSeek V4-ProNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
ProviderDeepSeek (China) NVIDIA (US)
ReleasedApril 24, 2026 June 4, 2026
Context window1M (~1,500 pages) 1M (~1,500 pages)
Price (in/out)$0.435/$0.87 per 1M tokens Open weight (self-host / free)
Open weight?Yes — self-hostable Yes — self-hostable
Modalitiestext, code text, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Open-weight 1.6T MoE (~49B active) — DeepSeek's largest, self-hostable

DeepSeek V4-Pro

DeepSeek V4-Pro lists open-weight 1.6T MoE (~49B active) — DeepSeek's largest, self-hostable among its strengths; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra does not.

1M-token context with up to 384K output tokens

DeepSeek V4-Pro

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is comparatively weak here — a 550B mixture-of-experts is heavy to self-host, and the 1M context is rarely served in full

Permanent low pricing at $0.435/$0.87 per million, set May 2026

DeepSeek V4-Pro

DeepSeek V4-Pro lists permanent low pricing at $0.435/$0.87 per million, set May 2026 among its strengths; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra does not.

The most capable open-weight model from a US lab (Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index of about 48)

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra

NVIDIA's open-weight reasoning flagship (about 550B total, 55B active) — the most capable open model from a US lab, built for long-running agents — and it is the newer of the two.

Fast, efficient long-horizon agentic reasoning via a hybrid Mamba-Transformer design

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra lists fast, efficient long-horizon agentic reasoning via a hybrid Mamba-Transformer design among its strengths; DeepSeek V4-Pro does not.

A fully open release — weights, training data, and recipes under a permissive license

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra lists a fully open release — weights, training data, and recipes under a permissive license among its strengths; DeepSeek V4-Pro does not.

Lowest cost at scale

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra

Its weights are open, so at volume you pay for your own hardware instead of DeepSeek V4-Pro's $0.435/$0.87 per 1M tokens.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra

At Open weight (self-host / free) it undercuts DeepSeek V4-Pro, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Anyone whose priority is open-weight 1.6t moe (~49b active) — deepseek's largest, self-hostable

DeepSeek V4-Pro

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is the most capable open-weight model from a us lab (artificial analysis intelligence index of about 48)

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra

That is its strongest area.

An enterprise with regional data-residency rules

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra or DeepSeek V4-Pro

Origin (China vs US) affects where data is processed and which compliance regime applies — check the provider's terms for your region.

DeepSeek V4-Pro: where it fits

DeepSeek's 1.6-trillion-parameter open-weight model at $0.435/$0.87 — strong open-weight coding and a 1M context at a fraction of flagship prices. Released April 24, 2026 by DeepSeek, it is built for open-weight 1.6T MoE (~49B active) — DeepSeek's largest, self-hostable, 1M-token context with up to 384K output tokens, permanent low pricing at $0.435/$0.87 per million, set May 2026, and sources place it near the top of open-weight coding, around 80 on SWE-Bench Verified.

Its trade-offs are real: independent SWE-Bench Verified placement is inconsistent across sources, pro and Pro-Max variants are quoted with different scores, text and code only — no image, audio or video, and overlaps DeepSeek V4 and V3.2 already in this comparison. At $0.435 in / $0.87 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra: where it fits

NVIDIA's open-weight reasoning flagship (about 550B total, 55B active) — the most capable open model from a US lab, built for long-running agents. Released June 4, 2026 by NVIDIA, it is built for the most capable open-weight model from a US lab (Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index of about 48), fast, efficient long-horizon agentic reasoning via a hybrid Mamba-Transformer design, a fully open release — weights, training data, and recipes under a permissive license, and strong coding for an open model (SWE-Bench Verified in the high 60s).

Its trade-offs: trails the best Chinese open models on overall intelligence, and a 550B mixture-of-experts is heavy to self-host, and the 1M context is rarely served in full. As an open-weight model, its running cost is your own hardware rather than a per-token fee.

The bottom line for this matchup

This is less "which is smarter" and more "which ecosystem fits." DeepSeek V4-Pro (China) and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra (US) differ on pricing philosophy, data-residency, and tooling as much as on raw scores. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is the cheaper option, which matters at volume. The pragmatic move is to run one real task through both and judge the outputs against your own constraints — including where your data is allowed to be processed.

Want both DeepSeek V4-Pro and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4-Pro or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, DeepSeek V4-Pro leans toward open-weight 1.6t moe (~49b active) — deepseek's largest, self-hostable while NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra leans toward the most capable open-weight model from a us lab (artificial analysis intelligence index of about 48), and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4-Pro or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra?

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is cheaper — $0.435/$0.87 per 1M tokens vs Open weight (self-host / free).

Which has the bigger context window?

Both advertise 1M (~1,500 pages). Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.

Can I use both DeepSeek V4-Pro and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you DeepSeek V4-Pro, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, DeepSeek V4-Pro or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra?

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra — released June 4, 2026, about 41 days after DeepSeek V4-Pro.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.