Pick DeepSeek V4-Flash for exceptional value — artificial analysis intelligence index 52 at just $0.14/$0.28 per million tokens or mit-licensed open weights — free to self-host or run via a western host. Pick GLM 5.1 for long-horizon autonomous agentic engineering (up to 8-hour runs) or state-of-the-art open-weight coding (topped swe-bench pro at launch). On a tight budget at scale, DeepSeek V4-Flash is the value pick.
DeepSeek V4-Flash (DeepSeek) and GLM 5.1 (Z.ai) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. DeepSeek V4-Flash is deepSeek's MIT-licensed open-weight model — arguably the best value-per-intelligence available, scoring 52 on the independent AA Index at just $0.14/$0.28 per million tokens. GLM 5.1 is an open-weight (MIT) Chinese coding model built for long-horizon agentic engineering, topping SWE-Bench Pro at launch while running autonomously for up to 8 hours. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences
Price: DeepSeek V4-Flash is about 10× cheaper on input ($0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens vs $1.4/$4.4 per 1M tokens) — a large enough gap that at scale it can be the single biggest line item in the decision.
Context window: DeepSeek V4-Flash holds 5× more — 1M (~1,500 pages) vs 200K (~300 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
Recency: DeepSeek V4-Flash is the newer model by about 4 months (released July 31, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Specifications
Spec
DeepSeek V4-Flash
GLM 5.1
Provider
DeepSeek (China)
Z.ai (China)
Released
July 31, 2026
April 7, 2026
Context window
1M (~1,500 pages)
200K (~300 pages)
Price (in/out)
$0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens
$1.4/$4.4 per 1M tokens
Open weight?
Yes — self-hostable
Yes — self-hostable
Modalities
text, code
text, code
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
Exceptional value — Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 52 at just $0.14/$0.28 per million tokens: DeepSeek V4-Flash — At $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens it undercuts GLM 5.1 ($1.4/$4.4 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.
MIT-licensed open weights — free to self-host or run via a Western host: DeepSeek V4-Flash — DeepSeek's MIT-licensed open-weight model — arguably the best value-per-intelligence available, scoring 52 on the independent AA Index at just $0.14/$0.28 per million tokens — and it runs cheaper at $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.
1M-token context window: DeepSeek V4-Flash — Its 1M window holds about 5× more than GLM 5.1's 200K in a single prompt.
Long-horizon autonomous agentic engineering (up to 8-hour runs): GLM 5.1 — DeepSeek V4-Flash is comparatively weak here — coding/agentic figures like Terminal-Bench 82.7 are DeepSeek's own, not independently reproduced
State-of-the-art open-weight coding (topped SWE-Bench Pro at launch): GLM 5.1 — GLM 5.1 lists state-of-the-art open-weight coding (topped SWE-Bench Pro at launch) among its strengths; DeepSeek V4-Flash does not.
Sustained tool use across thousands of calls: GLM 5.1 — GLM 5.1 lists sustained tool use across thousands of calls among its strengths; DeepSeek V4-Flash does not.
Lowest cost at scale: DeepSeek V4-Flash — At $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Largest single-prompt input: DeepSeek V4-Flash — Its 1M window is about 5× larger than GLM 5.1's 200K, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume: DeepSeek V4-Flash — At $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens it undercuts GLM 5.1, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases: DeepSeek V4-Flash — Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is exceptional value — artificial analysis intelligence index 52 at just $0.14/$0.28 per million tokens: DeepSeek V4-Flash — It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is long-horizon autonomous agentic engineering (up to 8-hour runs): GLM 5.1 — That is its strongest area.
DeepSeek V4-Flash: where it fits
DeepSeek's MIT-licensed open-weight model — arguably the best value-per-intelligence available, scoring 52 on the independent AA Index at just $0.14/$0.28 per million tokens. Released July 31, 2026 by DeepSeek, it is built for exceptional value — Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 52 at just $0.14/$0.28 per million tokens, mIT-licensed open weights — free to self-host or run via a Western host, 1M-token context window, and strong coding and agentic performance for the price (DeepSeek reports 82.7 on Terminal-Bench 2.1).
Its trade-offs are real: coding/agentic figures like Terminal-Bench 82.7 are DeepSeek's own, not independently reproduced, text and code focused — not a full multimodal model, deepSeek's own hosted API stores data in China; self-host or use a Western host for privacy, and below the top frontier models on overall intelligence. At $0.14 in / $0.28 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
GLM 5.1: where it fits
An open-weight (MIT) Chinese coding model built for long-horizon agentic engineering, topping SWE-Bench Pro at launch while running autonomously for up to 8 hours. Released April 7, 2026 by Z.ai, it is built for long-horizon autonomous agentic engineering (up to 8-hour runs), state-of-the-art open-weight coding (topped SWE-Bench Pro at launch), sustained tool use across thousands of calls, and self-hostable under a permissive MIT license.
Its trade-offs: text-only, with no image, audio, or video input, and 754B-parameter MoE demands heavy GPU resources to self-host. At $1.4 in / $4.4 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
DeepSeek V4-Flash and GLM 5.1 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. DeepSeek V4-Flash costs less per token; DeepSeek V4-Flash holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — DeepSeek V4-Flash for exceptional value — artificial analysis intelligence index 52 at just $0.14/$0.28 per million tokens, GLM 5.1 for long-horizon autonomous agentic engineering (up to 8-hour runs). Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek V4-Flash or GLM 5.1 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, DeepSeek V4-Flash leans toward exceptional value — artificial analysis intelligence index 52 at just $0.14/$0.28 per million tokens while GLM 5.1 leans toward long-horizon autonomous agentic engineering (up to 8-hour runs), and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4-Flash or GLM 5.1?
DeepSeek V4-Flash is cheaper — $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens vs $1.4/$4.4 per 1M tokens, roughly 10× apart on input.
Which has the bigger context window?
DeepSeek V4-Flash — 1M vs 200K, about 5× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both DeepSeek V4-Flash and GLM 5.1 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you DeepSeek V4-Flash, GLM 5.1 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, DeepSeek V4-Flash or GLM 5.1?
DeepSeek V4-Flash — released July 31, 2026, about 4 months after GLM 5.1.
DeepSeek V4-Flash vs GLM 5.1
DeepSeek · China | Z.ai · China · Updated June 2026
Quick verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4-Flash for exceptional value — artificial analysis intelligence index 52 at just $0.14/$0.28 per million tokens or mit-licensed open weights — free to self-host or run via a western host. Pick GLM 5.1 for long-horizon autonomous agentic engineering (up to 8-hour runs) or state-of-the-art open-weight coding (topped swe-bench pro at launch). On a tight budget at scale, DeepSeek V4-Flash is the value pick.
DeepSeek V4-Flash (DeepSeek) and GLM 5.1 (Z.ai) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. DeepSeek V4-Flash is deepSeek's MIT-licensed open-weight model — arguably the best value-per-intelligence available, scoring 52 on the independent AA Index at just $0.14/$0.28 per million tokens. GLM 5.1 is an open-weight (MIT) Chinese coding model built for long-horizon agentic engineering, topping SWE-Bench Pro at launch while running autonomously for up to 8 hours. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.
Key differences at a glance
▸Price: DeepSeek V4-Flash is about 10× cheaper on input ($0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens vs $1.4/$4.4 per 1M tokens) — a large enough gap that at scale it can be the single biggest line item in the decision.
▸Context window: DeepSeek V4-Flash holds 5× more — 1M (~1,500 pages) vs 200K (~300 pages). But effective recall usually fades long before the advertised ceiling, so the bigger number only helps if the model reasons over it.
▸Recency: DeepSeek V4-Flash is the newer model by about 4 months (released July 31, 2026), usually meaning fresher training data and capabilities.
Side-by-side specs
Spec
DeepSeek V4-Flash
GLM 5.1
Provider
DeepSeek (China)
Z.ai (China)
Released
July 31, 2026
April 7, 2026
Context window
1M (~1,500 pages)
200K (~300 pages)
Price (in/out)
$0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens
$1.4/$4.4 per 1M tokens
Open weight?
Yes — self-hostable
Yes — self-hostable
Modalities
text, code
text, code
SWE-Bench Verified
Not published
Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1M
Not published
Not published
Who wins what
Exceptional value — Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 52 at just $0.14/$0.28 per million tokens
DeepSeek V4-Flash
At $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens it undercuts GLM 5.1 ($1.4/$4.4 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.
MIT-licensed open weights — free to self-host or run via a Western host
DeepSeek V4-Flash
DeepSeek's MIT-licensed open-weight model — arguably the best value-per-intelligence available, scoring 52 on the independent AA Index at just $0.14/$0.28 per million tokens — and it runs cheaper at $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.
1M-token context window
DeepSeek V4-Flash
Its 1M window holds about 5× more than GLM 5.1's 200K in a single prompt.
Long-horizon autonomous agentic engineering (up to 8-hour runs)
GLM 5.1
DeepSeek V4-Flash is comparatively weak here — coding/agentic figures like Terminal-Bench 82.7 are DeepSeek's own, not independently reproduced
State-of-the-art open-weight coding (topped SWE-Bench Pro at launch)
GLM 5.1
GLM 5.1 lists state-of-the-art open-weight coding (topped SWE-Bench Pro at launch) among its strengths; DeepSeek V4-Flash does not.
Sustained tool use across thousands of calls
GLM 5.1
GLM 5.1 lists sustained tool use across thousands of calls among its strengths; DeepSeek V4-Flash does not.
Lowest cost at scale
DeepSeek V4-Flash
At $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.
Largest single-prompt input
DeepSeek V4-Flash
Its 1M window is about 5× larger than GLM 5.1's 200K, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.
Which should you pick?
A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume
→ DeepSeek V4-Flash
At $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens it undercuts GLM 5.1, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.
Someone analysing very long documents or codebases
→ DeepSeek V4-Flash
Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.
Anyone whose priority is exceptional value — artificial analysis intelligence index 52 at just $0.14/$0.28 per million tokens
→ DeepSeek V4-Flash
It is specifically built for that.
Anyone whose priority is long-horizon autonomous agentic engineering (up to 8-hour runs)
→ GLM 5.1
That is its strongest area.
DeepSeek V4-Flash: where it fits
DeepSeek's MIT-licensed open-weight model — arguably the best value-per-intelligence available, scoring 52 on the independent AA Index at just $0.14/$0.28 per million tokens. Released July 31, 2026 by DeepSeek, it is built for exceptional value — Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 52 at just $0.14/$0.28 per million tokens, mIT-licensed open weights — free to self-host or run via a Western host, 1M-token context window, and strong coding and agentic performance for the price (DeepSeek reports 82.7 on Terminal-Bench 2.1).
Its trade-offs are real: coding/agentic figures like Terminal-Bench 82.7 are DeepSeek's own, not independently reproduced, text and code focused — not a full multimodal model, deepSeek's own hosted API stores data in China; self-host or use a Western host for privacy, and below the top frontier models on overall intelligence. At $0.14 in / $0.28 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.
GLM 5.1: where it fits
An open-weight (MIT) Chinese coding model built for long-horizon agentic engineering, topping SWE-Bench Pro at launch while running autonomously for up to 8 hours. Released April 7, 2026 by Z.ai, it is built for long-horizon autonomous agentic engineering (up to 8-hour runs), state-of-the-art open-weight coding (topped SWE-Bench Pro at launch), sustained tool use across thousands of calls, and self-hostable under a permissive MIT license.
Its trade-offs: text-only, with no image, audio, or video input, and 754B-parameter MoE demands heavy GPU resources to self-host. At $1.4 in / $4.4 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.
The bottom line for this matchup
DeepSeek V4-Flash and GLM 5.1 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. DeepSeek V4-Flash costs less per token; DeepSeek V4-Flash holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — DeepSeek V4-Flash for exceptional value — artificial analysis intelligence index 52 at just $0.14/$0.28 per million tokens, GLM 5.1 for long-horizon autonomous agentic engineering (up to 8-hour runs). Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.
Want both DeepSeek V4-Flash and GLM 5.1 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.
Is DeepSeek V4-Flash or GLM 5.1 better for coding?
Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, DeepSeek V4-Flash leans toward exceptional value — artificial analysis intelligence index 52 at just $0.14/$0.28 per million tokens while GLM 5.1 leans toward long-horizon autonomous agentic engineering (up to 8-hour runs), and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4-Flash or GLM 5.1?
DeepSeek V4-Flash is cheaper — $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens vs $1.4/$4.4 per 1M tokens, roughly 10× apart on input.
Which has the bigger context window?
DeepSeek V4-Flash — 1M vs 200K, about 5× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.
Can I use both DeepSeek V4-Flash and GLM 5.1 together?
Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you DeepSeek V4-Flash, GLM 5.1 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.
Which is newer, DeepSeek V4-Flash or GLM 5.1?
DeepSeek V4-Flash — released July 31, 2026, about 4 months after GLM 5.1.
Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.