Command A vs GLM 4.7

Cohere · Global  |  Z.ai · China · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Command A for enterprise rag and retrieval or strong long-context retrieval accuracy. Pick GLM 4.7 for genuinely permissive open weights — an mit-licensed 358b mixture-of-experts with no commercial restrictions or strong agentic coding for the price — 73.8% on swe-bench verified undercut most closed frontier models at launch. Choose GLM 4.7 if you need self-hosting or data privacy; Command A if you want a managed API.

Command A (Cohere) and GLM 4.7 (Z.ai) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Command A is cohere's enterprise-focused model built for retrieval-augmented and grounded workloads. GLM 4.7 is an MIT-licensed 358B open mixture-of-experts with strong 73.8% SWE-Bench Verified coding — but two generations behind GLM 5.2. They diverge most on price, context window and open vs. closed weights — each quantified below from the models' real specs.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecCommand AGLM 4.7
ProviderCohere (Global) Z.ai (China)
ReleasedMarch 2025 December 22, 2025
Context window256K (~384 pages) 200K (~304 pages)
Price (in/out)$2.5/$10 per 1M tokens $0.6/$2.2 per 1M tokens
Open weight?No — API only Yes — self-hostable
Modalitiestext, code text, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published 73.8%
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Enterprise RAG and retrieval

Command A

Cohere's enterprise-focused model built for retrieval-augmented and grounded workloads — and it carries the larger 256K context.

Strong long-context retrieval accuracy

Command A

Its 256K window holds about 1.3× more than GLM 4.7's 200K in a single prompt.

Multilingual

Command A

Command A lists multilingual among its strengths; GLM 4.7 does not.

Genuinely permissive open weights — an MIT-licensed 358B mixture-of-experts with no commercial restrictions

GLM 4.7

Open weights make this possible at all — Command A is API-only, so it cannot leave the vendor's servers.

Strong agentic coding for the price — 73.8% on SWE-Bench Verified undercut most closed frontier models at launch

GLM 4.7

At $0.6/$2.2 per 1M tokens it undercuts Command A ($2.5/$10 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.

An unusually generous 128K maximum output, which suits bulk refactors and long generation

GLM 4.7

An MIT-licensed 358B open mixture-of-experts with strong 73.8% SWE-Bench Verified coding — but two generations behind GLM 5.2 — and it runs cheaper at $0.6/$2.2 per 1M tokens.

Lowest cost at scale

GLM 4.7

At $0.6/$2.2 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.

Largest single-prompt input

Command A

Its 256K window is about 1.3× larger than GLM 4.7's 200K, fitting roughly 384 pages in one prompt.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

GLM 4.7

At $0.6/$2.2 per 1M tokens it undercuts Command A, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

Command A

Larger 256K window fits more in one prompt.

A team with data-privacy or self-hosting needs

GLM 4.7

Open weights let you run it on your own hardware; Command A is API-only.

Anyone whose priority is enterprise rag and retrieval

Command A

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is genuinely permissive open weights — an mit-licensed 358b mixture-of-experts with no commercial restrictions

GLM 4.7

That is its strongest area.

Command A: where it fits

Cohere's enterprise-focused model built for retrieval-augmented and grounded workloads. Released March 2025 by Cohere, it is built for enterprise RAG and retrieval, strong long-context retrieval accuracy, multilingual, and tool use.

Its trade-offs are real: less consumer presence, and narrower modality support. At $2.5 in / $10 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

GLM 4.7: where it fits

An MIT-licensed 358B open mixture-of-experts with strong 73.8% SWE-Bench Verified coding — but two generations behind GLM 5.2. Released December 22, 2025 by Z.ai, it is built for genuinely permissive open weights — an MIT-licensed 358B mixture-of-experts with no commercial restrictions, strong agentic coding for the price — 73.8% on SWE-Bench Verified undercut most closed frontier models at launch, an unusually generous 128K maximum output, which suits bulk refactors and long generation, and cheap long-running agent loops thanks to aggressive prompt caching.

Its trade-offs: two generations behind — GLM 5, 5.1 and 5.2 have all shipped since, and new builds should default to those, its Verified lead narrows sharply on harder evaluations like SWE-Bench Pro, and text-only with no vision, and self-hosting a 358B model is a serious hardware commitment. At $0.6 in / $2.2 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

The defining split here is open vs. closed. GLM 4.7 gives you weights you control — self-host it, fine-tune it, keep data in-house, pay only for hardware. Command A gives you a managed, always-updated API with no infrastructure to run. Teams with GPUs, privacy requirements, or huge volume often favour the open model; teams that want zero ops and the latest capabilities favour the closed one. Capability is close enough that this operational question, not the benchmark, usually decides it.

Want both Command A and GLM 4.7 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A or GLM 4.7 better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for Command A, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Command A leans toward enterprise rag and retrieval while GLM 4.7 leans toward genuinely permissive open weights — an mit-licensed 358b mixture-of-experts with no commercial restrictions, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Command A or GLM 4.7?

GLM 4.7 is open-weight, so self-hosting means no per-token fee (you pay for hardware instead), while Command A is API-metered at $2.5/$10 per 1M tokens. For most teams without GPUs, the API model is cheaper to start; at very high volume, self-hosting can win.

Which has the bigger context window?

Command A — 256K vs 200K, about 1.3× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.

Can I use both Command A and GLM 4.7 together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Command A, GLM 4.7 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Command A or GLM 4.7?

GLM 4.7 — released December 22, 2025, about 10 months after Command A.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.