Claude Sonnet 5 vs Grok 4

Anthropic · US  |  xAI · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Claude Sonnet 5 for agentic workflows that plan, use tools, and run autonomously or multi-step coding, debugging, and tool use. Pick Grok 4 for 256k context with native tool use or real-time data via x integration.

Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic) and Grok 4 (xAI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Claude Sonnet 5 is anthropic's most agentic Sonnet, with near-Opus-4.8 performance at Sonnet prices; the default model on Free and Pro. Grok 4 is xAI's 2M-context model with live data access and strong reasoning chops. Their biggest split is context window, and the breakdown below shows exactly how that plays out for your workload.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecClaude Sonnet 5Grok 4
ProviderAnthropic (US) xAI (US)
ReleasedJune 30, 2026 July 9, 2025
Context window1M (~1,500 pages) 256K (~384 pages)
Price (in/out)$3/$15 per 1M tokens $3/$15 per 1M tokens
Open weight?No — API only No — API only
Modalitiestext, image, code text, image, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Agentic workflows that plan, use tools, and run autonomously

Claude Sonnet 5

A core design strength of Claude Sonnet 5.

Multi-step coding, debugging, and tool use

Claude Sonnet 5

A core design strength of Claude Sonnet 5.

Everyday professional and knowledge work

Claude Sonnet 5

A core design strength of Claude Sonnet 5.

256K context with native tool use

Grok 4

A core design strength of Grok 4.

Real-time data via X integration

Grok 4

A core design strength of Grok 4.

Strong academic reasoning

Grok 4

A core design strength of Grok 4.

Largest single-prompt input

Claude Sonnet 5

Its 1M window is about 3.9× larger, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.

Which should you pick?

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

Claude Sonnet 5

Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.

Anyone whose priority is agentic workflows that plan, use tools, and run autonomously

Claude Sonnet 5

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is 256k context with native tool use

Grok 4

That is its strongest area.

Claude Sonnet 5: where it fits

Anthropic's most agentic Sonnet, with near-Opus-4.8 performance at Sonnet prices; the default model on Free and Pro. Released June 30, 2026 by Anthropic, it is built for agentic workflows that plan, use tools, and run autonomously, multi-step coding, debugging, and tool use, everyday professional and knowledge work, and long-document analysis and reasoning.

Its trade-offs are real: lower peak accuracy than Opus 4.8 on the hardest tasks, and an updated tokenizer that can use 1.0-1.35x more tokens for the same text. At $3 in / $15 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

Grok 4: where it fits

XAI's 2M-context model with live data access and strong reasoning chops. Released July 9, 2025 by xAI, it is built for 256K context with native tool use, real-time data via X integration, strong academic reasoning, and no long-context surcharge.

Its trade-offs: smaller ecosystem than OpenAI/Google, and less independent benchmark coverage. At $3 in / $15 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

Claude Sonnet 5 and Grok 4 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. Claude Sonnet 5 holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Claude Sonnet 5 for agentic workflows that plan, use tools, and run autonomously, Grok 4 for 256k context with native tool use. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.

Want both Claude Sonnet 5 and Grok 4 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5 or Grok 4 better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Claude Sonnet 5 leans toward agentic workflows that plan, use tools, and run autonomously while Grok 4 leans toward 256k context with native tool use, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or Grok 4?

They are priced almost identically, so cost will not decide between them.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 5 — 1M vs 256K, about 3.9× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.

Can I use both Claude Sonnet 5 and Grok 4 together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Claude Sonnet 5, Grok 4 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Claude Sonnet 5 or Grok 4?

Claude Sonnet 5 — released June 30, 2026, about 12 months after Grok 4.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.