Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.4

Anthropic · US  |  OpenAI · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Claude Sonnet 5 for agentic workflows that plan, use tools, and run autonomously or multi-step coding, debugging, and tool use. Pick GPT-5.4 for strong general-purpose default or coding and software engineering. On a tight budget at scale, Claude Sonnet 5 is the value pick.

Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.4 (OpenAI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Claude Sonnet 5 is anthropic's most agentic Sonnet, with near-Opus-4.8 performance at Sonnet prices; the default model on Free and Pro. GPT-5.4 is openAI's 2026 workhorse — unifies Codex and GPT into a strong default that costs half of GPT-5.5. Their biggest split is price, and the breakdown below shows exactly how that plays out for your workload.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecClaude Sonnet 5GPT-5.4
ProviderAnthropic (US) OpenAI (US)
ReleasedJune 30, 2026 March 5, 2026
Context window1M (~1,500 pages) 1M (~1,500 pages)
Price (in/out)$2/$10 per 1M tokens $2.5/$15 per 1M tokens
Open weight?No — API only No — API only
Modalitiestext, image, code text, image, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Agentic workflows that plan, use tools, and run autonomously

Claude Sonnet 5

Anthropic's most agentic Sonnet, with near-Opus-4.8 performance at Sonnet prices; the default model on Free and Pro — and it runs cheaper at $2/$10 per 1M tokens.

Multi-step coding, debugging, and tool use

Claude Sonnet 5

Anthropic's most agentic Sonnet, with near-Opus-4.8 performance at Sonnet prices; the default model on Free and Pro — and it is the newer of the two.

Everyday professional and knowledge work

Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 lists everyday professional and knowledge work among its strengths; GPT-5.4 does not.

Strong general-purpose default

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 lists strong general-purpose default among its strengths; Claude Sonnet 5 does not.

Coding and software engineering

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 lists coding and software engineering among its strengths; Claude Sonnet 5 does not.

Document understanding and tool use

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 lists document understanding and tool use among its strengths; Claude Sonnet 5 does not.

Lowest cost at scale

Claude Sonnet 5

At $2/$10 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

→ Claude Sonnet 5

At $2/$10 per 1M tokens it undercuts GPT-5.4, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Anyone whose priority is agentic workflows that plan, use tools, and run autonomously

→ Claude Sonnet 5

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is strong general-purpose default

→ GPT-5.4

That is its strongest area.

Claude Sonnet 5: where it fits

Anthropic's most agentic Sonnet, with near-Opus-4.8 performance at Sonnet prices; the default model on Free and Pro. Released June 30, 2026 by Anthropic, it is built for agentic workflows that plan, use tools, and run autonomously, multi-step coding, debugging, and tool use, everyday professional and knowledge work, and long-document analysis and reasoning.

Its trade-offs are real: lower peak accuracy than Opus 4.8 on the hardest tasks, and an updated tokenizer that can use 1.0-1.35x more tokens for the same text. At $2 in / $10 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

GPT-5.4: where it fits

OpenAI's 2026 workhorse — unifies Codex and GPT into a strong default that costs half of GPT-5.5. Released March 5, 2026 by OpenAI, it is built for strong general-purpose default, coding and software engineering, document understanding and tool use, and 1M context with good token efficiency.

Its trade-offs: topped by GPT-5.5 on the hardest tasks, and pricier than open-weight rivals. At $2.5 in / $15 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

Claude Sonnet 5 and GPT-5.4 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. Claude Sonnet 5 costs less per token; and each leads in its own area — Claude Sonnet 5 for agentic workflows that plan, use tools, and run autonomously, GPT-5.4 for strong general-purpose default. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.

Want both Claude Sonnet 5 and GPT-5.4 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5 or GPT-5.4 better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Claude Sonnet 5 leans toward agentic workflows that plan, use tools, and run autonomously while GPT-5.4 leans toward strong general-purpose default, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or GPT-5.4?

Claude Sonnet 5 is cheaper — $2/$10 per 1M tokens vs $2.5/$15 per 1M tokens, roughly 1.3× apart on input.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both advertise 1M (~1,500 pages). Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.

Can I use both Claude Sonnet 5 and GPT-5.4 together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Claude Sonnet 5, GPT-5.4 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Claude Sonnet 5 or GPT-5.4?

Claude Sonnet 5 — released June 30, 2026, about 4 months after GPT-5.4.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.