Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-5.4 Mini

Anthropic · US  |  OpenAI · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 for terminal-bench 4.0 agentic coding jumps to 70.6%, up from claude sonnet 5's 10.3% or same $2/$10 per million token pricing as sonnet 5, with cache-read price cut 50% to $0.10/mtok as of october 7, 2026. Pick GPT-5.4 Mini for free for every chatgpt user or fast, low-cost general tasks. On a tight budget at scale, GPT-5.4 Mini is the value pick.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.4 Mini (OpenAI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is anthropic's September 28, 2026 mid-tier update — same $2/$10 pricing as Sonnet 5 but a large agentic-coding jump (Terminal-Bench 4.0: 70.6% vs 10.3%). GPT-5.4 Mini is openAI's free, fast workhorse — capable general AI with no subscription needed. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-5.4 Mini
ProviderAnthropic (US) OpenAI (US)
ReleasedSeptember 28, 2026 March 17, 2026
Context window1M tokens (~1,500 pages) 400K (~600 pages)
Price (in/out)$2/$10 per 1M tokens $0.75/$4.5 per 1M tokens
Open weight?No — API only No — API only
Modalitiestext, image, code text, image, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Terminal-Bench 4.0 agentic coding jumps to 70.6%, up from Claude Sonnet 5's 10.3%

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Anthropic's September 28, 2026 mid-tier update — same $2/$10 pricing as Sonnet 5 but a large agentic-coding jump (Terminal-Bench 4.0: 70.6% vs 10.3%) — and it carries the larger 1M tokens context.

Same $2/$10 per million token pricing as Sonnet 5, with cache-read price cut 50% to $0.10/MTok as of October 7, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Its 1M tokens window holds about 2.5× more than GPT-5.4 Mini's 400K in a single prompt.

Scores close to Opus 5.5 on several benchmarks (e.g. GDPval-AA v2.1 knowledge-work Elo) at a fraction of the cost

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Anthropic's September 28, 2026 mid-tier update — same $2/$10 pricing as Sonnet 5 but a large agentic-coding jump (Terminal-Bench 4.0: 70.6% vs 10.3%) — and it is the newer of the two.

Free for every ChatGPT user

GPT-5.4 Mini

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is comparatively weak here — 1M-token context isn't uniformly available across every platform/plan, consistent with the rest of the 5.5 family

Fast, low-cost general tasks

GPT-5.4 Mini

At $0.75/$4.5 per 1M tokens it undercuts Claude Sonnet 5.5 ($2/$10 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.

Subagent capabilities

GPT-5.4 Mini

OpenAI's free, fast workhorse — capable general AI with no subscription needed — and it runs cheaper at $0.75/$4.5 per 1M tokens.

Lowest cost at scale

GPT-5.4 Mini

At $0.75/$4.5 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.

Largest single-prompt input

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Its 1M tokens window is about 2.5× larger than GPT-5.4 Mini's 400K, fitting roughly 1,500 pages in one prompt.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

→ GPT-5.4 Mini

At $0.75/$4.5 per 1M tokens it undercuts Claude Sonnet 5.5, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

→ Claude Sonnet 5.5

Larger 1M tokens window fits more in one prompt.

Anyone whose priority is terminal-bench 4.0 agentic coding jumps to 70.6%, up from claude sonnet 5's 10.3%

→ Claude Sonnet 5.5

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is free for every chatgpt user

→ GPT-5.4 Mini

That is its strongest area.

Claude Sonnet 5.5: where it fits

Anthropic's September 28, 2026 mid-tier update — same $2/$10 pricing as Sonnet 5 but a large agentic-coding jump (Terminal-Bench 4.0: 70.6% vs 10.3%). Released September 28, 2026 by Anthropic, it is built for terminal-Bench 4.0 agentic coding jumps to 70.6%, up from Claude Sonnet 5's 10.3%, same $2/$10 per million token pricing as Sonnet 5, with cache-read price cut 50% to $0.10/MTok as of October 7, 2026, scores close to Opus 5.5 on several benchmarks (e.g. GDPval-AA v2.1 knowledge-work Elo) at a fraction of the cost, and anthropic highlights stronger document/slide generation, spreadsheet work, and visual chart recognition (Chartography: 61.6%).

Its trade-offs are real: anthropic is explicit that Opus 5.5 'remains clearly stronger' on complex, open-ended work requiring sustained judgment, 1M-token context isn't uniformly available across every platform/plan, consistent with the rest of the 5.5 family, and mid-tier update released a week after Opus 5.5 (Sept 22) — Haiku 5.5 followed Oct 7 to complete the family. At $2 in / $10 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

GPT-5.4 Mini: where it fits

OpenAI's free, fast workhorse — capable general AI with no subscription needed. Released March 17, 2026 by OpenAI, it is built for free for every ChatGPT user, fast, low-cost general tasks, subagent capabilities, and native multimodal reasoning.

Its trade-offs: smaller context than flagship models, and not for the hardest reasoning. At $0.75 in / $4.5 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-5.4 Mini overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. GPT-5.4 Mini costs less per token; Claude Sonnet 5.5 holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Claude Sonnet 5.5 for terminal-bench 4.0 agentic coding jumps to 70.6%, up from claude sonnet 5's 10.3%, GPT-5.4 Mini for free for every chatgpt user. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.

Want both Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-5.4 Mini without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-5.4 Mini better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for either model, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Claude Sonnet 5.5 leans toward terminal-bench 4.0 agentic coding jumps to 70.6%, up from claude sonnet 5's 10.3% while GPT-5.4 Mini leans toward free for every chatgpt user, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-5.4 Mini?

GPT-5.4 Mini is cheaper — $2/$10 per 1M tokens vs $0.75/$4.5 per 1M tokens, roughly 2.7× apart on input.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 — 1M tokens vs 400K, about 2.5× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.

Can I use both Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-5.4 Mini together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Claude Sonnet 5.5, GPT-5.4 Mini and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-5.4 Mini?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 — released September 28, 2026, about 7 months after GPT-5.4 Mini.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.