Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-4.1 Mini

Anthropic · US  |  OpenAI · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 for terminal-bench 4.0 agentic coding jumps to 70.6%, up from claude sonnet 5's 10.3% or same $2/$10 per million token pricing as sonnet 5, with cache-read price cut 50% to $0.10/mtok as of october 7, 2026. Pick GPT-4.1 Mini for very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens or instruction following above its weight class — 84.1% on ifeval, beating gpt-4o. On a tight budget at scale, GPT-4.1 Mini is the value pick.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-4.1 Mini (OpenAI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is anthropic's September 28, 2026 mid-tier update — same $2/$10 pricing as Sonnet 5 but a large agentic-coding jump (Terminal-Bench 4.0: 70.6% vs 10.3%). GPT-4.1 Mini is a cheap, fast 1M-context workhorse with strong instruction following but weak coding — already retired from ChatGPT. They diverge most on price and context window — each quantified below from the models' real specs.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-4.1 Mini
ProviderAnthropic (US) OpenAI (US)
ReleasedSeptember 28, 2026 April 14, 2025
Context window1M tokens (~1,500 pages) 1M (~1,571 pages)
Price (in/out)$2/$10 per 1M tokens $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens
Open weight?No — API only No — API only
Modalitiestext, image, code text, image, code
SWE-Bench VerifiedNot published 23.6%
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Terminal-Bench 4.0 agentic coding jumps to 70.6%, up from Claude Sonnet 5's 10.3%

Claude Sonnet 5.5

GPT-4.1 Mini is comparatively weak here — weak at agentic coding — its 23.6% on SWE-Bench Verified sits below GPT-4o's 33.2%

Same $2/$10 per million token pricing as Sonnet 5, with cache-read price cut 50% to $0.10/MTok as of October 7, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Anthropic's September 28, 2026 mid-tier update — same $2/$10 pricing as Sonnet 5 but a large agentic-coding jump (Terminal-Bench 4.0: 70.6% vs 10.3%) — and it is the newer of the two.

Scores close to Opus 5.5 on several benchmarks (e.g. GDPval-AA v2.1 knowledge-work Elo) at a fraction of the cost

Claude Sonnet 5.5

GPT-4.1 Mini is comparatively weak here — a June 2024 knowledge cutoff, now roughly two years stale, and no reasoning mode

Very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens

GPT-4.1 Mini

At $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens it undercuts Claude Sonnet 5.5 ($2/$10 per 1M tokens), and that gap compounds at volume.

Instruction following above its weight class — 84.1% on IFEval, beating GPT-4o

GPT-4.1 Mini

A cheap, fast 1M-context workhorse with strong instruction following but weak coding — already retired from ChatGPT — and it runs cheaper at $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens.

Multi-turn coherence for its tier — 35.8% on MultiChallenge, roughly 1.8x GPT-4o mini

GPT-4.1 Mini

GPT-4.1 Mini lists multi-turn coherence for its tier — 35.8% on MultiChallenge, roughly 1.8x GPT-4o mini among its strengths; Claude Sonnet 5.5 does not.

Lowest cost at scale

GPT-4.1 Mini

At $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens, it is the cheaper of the two — the gap dominates the bill on high-volume workloads.

Which should you pick?

A cost-sensitive startup shipping high volume

→ GPT-4.1 Mini

At $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens it undercuts Claude Sonnet 5.5, and on millions of tokens that margin decides the monthly bill.

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

→ GPT-4.1 Mini

Larger 1M window fits more in one prompt.

Anyone whose priority is terminal-bench 4.0 agentic coding jumps to 70.6%, up from claude sonnet 5's 10.3%

→ Claude Sonnet 5.5

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens

→ GPT-4.1 Mini

That is its strongest area.

Claude Sonnet 5.5: where it fits

Anthropic's September 28, 2026 mid-tier update — same $2/$10 pricing as Sonnet 5 but a large agentic-coding jump (Terminal-Bench 4.0: 70.6% vs 10.3%). Released September 28, 2026 by Anthropic, it is built for terminal-Bench 4.0 agentic coding jumps to 70.6%, up from Claude Sonnet 5's 10.3%, same $2/$10 per million token pricing as Sonnet 5, with cache-read price cut 50% to $0.10/MTok as of October 7, 2026, scores close to Opus 5.5 on several benchmarks (e.g. GDPval-AA v2.1 knowledge-work Elo) at a fraction of the cost, and anthropic highlights stronger document/slide generation, spreadsheet work, and visual chart recognition (Chartography: 61.6%).

Its trade-offs are real: anthropic is explicit that Opus 5.5 'remains clearly stronger' on complex, open-ended work requiring sustained judgment, 1M-token context isn't uniformly available across every platform/plan, consistent with the rest of the 5.5 family, and mid-tier update released a week after Opus 5.5 (Sept 22) — Haiku 5.5 followed Oct 7 to complete the family. At $2 in / $10 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

GPT-4.1 Mini: where it fits

A cheap, fast 1M-context workhorse with strong instruction following but weak coding — already retired from ChatGPT. Released April 14, 2025 by OpenAI, it is built for very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens, instruction following above its weight class — 84.1% on IFEval, beating GPT-4o, multi-turn coherence for its tier — 35.8% on MultiChallenge, roughly 1.8x GPT-4o mini, and a full 1M context at flat pricing, with no long-context premium.

Its trade-offs: weak at agentic coding — its 23.6% on SWE-Bench Verified sits below GPT-4o's 33.2%, retired from ChatGPT in February 2026, and OpenAI's own docs now point users to GPT-5 mini instead, and a June 2024 knowledge cutoff, now roughly two years stale, and no reasoning mode. At $0.4 in / $1.6 out per million tokens, it sits in the budget price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-4.1 Mini overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. GPT-4.1 Mini costs less per token; GPT-4.1 Mini holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Claude Sonnet 5.5 for terminal-bench 4.0 agentic coding jumps to 70.6%, up from claude sonnet 5's 10.3%, GPT-4.1 Mini for very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.

Want both Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-4.1 Mini without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-4.1 Mini better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for Claude Sonnet 5.5, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Claude Sonnet 5.5 leans toward terminal-bench 4.0 agentic coding jumps to 70.6%, up from claude sonnet 5's 10.3% while GPT-4.1 Mini leans toward very cheap high-volume text work at $0.40 in / $1.60 out per million tokens, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-4.1 Mini?

GPT-4.1 Mini is cheaper — $2/$10 per 1M tokens vs $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens, roughly 5× apart on input.

Which has the bigger context window?

Effectively neither — 1M tokens vs 1M is a difference of a few percent. Remember advertised ≠ usable: recall typically degrades before the ceiling.

Can I use both Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-4.1 Mini together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Claude Sonnet 5.5, GPT-4.1 Mini and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-4.1 Mini?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 — released September 28, 2026, about 18 months after GPT-4.1 Mini.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.