Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Grok 4

Anthropic · US  |  xAI · US · Updated June 2026

Quick verdict

Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 for agentic coding — 77.2% on swe-bench verified, the best score any model had posted at its launch or computer use and gui automation (61.4% osworld at launch). Pick Grok 4 for 256k context with native tool use or real-time data via x integration.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) and Grok 4 (xAI) are two of the models people most often weigh against each other in 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is september 2025's coding state of the art at $3/$15 — still supported, but 200K-capped and twice superseded. Grok 4 is xAI's 2M-context model with live data access and strong reasoning chops. Their biggest split is context window, and the breakdown below shows exactly how that plays out for your workload.

Key differences at a glance

Side-by-side specs

SpecClaude Sonnet 4.5Grok 4
ProviderAnthropic (US) xAI (US)
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025 July 9, 2025
Context window200K (~300 pages) 256K (~384 pages)
Price (in/out)$3/$15 per 1M tokens $3/$15 per 1M tokens
Open weight?No — API only No — API only
Modalitiestext, image, code text, image, code
SWE-Bench Verified77.2% Not published
MRCR v2 @ 1MNot published Not published

Who wins what

Agentic coding — 77.2% on SWE-Bench Verified, the best score any model had posted at its launch

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Grok 4 is comparatively weak here — less independent benchmark coverage

Computer use and GUI automation (61.4% OSWorld at launch)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

September 2025's coding state of the art at $3/$15 — still supported, but 200K-capped and twice superseded — and it is the newer of the two.

Long-horizon autonomy — Anthropic reported 30+ hours of sustained focus on multi-step tasks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5 lists long-horizon autonomy — Anthropic reported 30+ hours of sustained focus on multi-step tasks among its strengths; Grok 4 does not.

256K context with native tool use

Grok 4

Its 256K window holds about 1.3× more than Claude Sonnet 4.5's 200K in a single prompt.

Real-time data via X integration

Grok 4

XAI's 2M-context model with live data access and strong reasoning chops — and it carries the larger 256K context.

Strong academic reasoning

Grok 4

Grok 4 lists strong academic reasoning among its strengths; Claude Sonnet 4.5 does not.

Largest single-prompt input

Grok 4

Its 256K window is about 1.3× larger than Claude Sonnet 4.5's 200K, fitting roughly 384 pages in one prompt.

Which should you pick?

Someone analysing very long documents or codebases

Grok 4

Larger 256K window fits more in one prompt.

Anyone whose priority is agentic coding — 77.2% on swe-bench verified, the best score any model had posted at its launch

Claude Sonnet 4.5

It is specifically built for that.

Anyone whose priority is 256k context with native tool use

Grok 4

That is its strongest area.

Claude Sonnet 4.5: where it fits

September 2025's coding state of the art at $3/$15 — still supported, but 200K-capped and twice superseded. Released September 29, 2025 by Anthropic, it is built for agentic coding — 77.2% on SWE-Bench Verified, the best score any model had posted at its launch, computer use and GUI automation (61.4% OSWorld at launch), long-horizon autonomy — Anthropic reported 30+ hours of sustained focus on multi-step tasks, and tracking its own remaining token budget natively, which few models do.

Its trade-offs are real: superseded twice — Sonnet 4.6 and Sonnet 5 match or beat it at the same or lower price, capped at 200K since Anthropic retired its 1M beta in April 2026, while its successors ship 1M as standard, and missing the modern API surface: no adaptive thinking, no effort control, and half the max output of newer Sonnets. At $3 in / $15 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

Grok 4: where it fits

XAI's 2M-context model with live data access and strong reasoning chops. Released July 9, 2025 by xAI, it is built for 256K context with native tool use, real-time data via X integration, strong academic reasoning, and no long-context surcharge.

Its trade-offs: smaller ecosystem than OpenAI/Google, and less independent benchmark coverage. At $3 in / $15 out per million tokens, it sits in the mid price band.

The bottom line for this matchup

Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Grok 4 overlap enough that the right pick depends on your specific job. Grok 4 holds the larger context; and each leads in its own area — Claude Sonnet 4.5 for agentic coding — 77.2% on swe-bench verified, the best score any model had posted at its launch, Grok 4 for 256k context with native tool use. Rather than crowning one, run the same hard task through both once and let the results decide.

Want both Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Grok 4 without two subscriptions? LumiChats gives you these plus 40+ models under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day) — draft with one, cross-check with the other.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Grok 4 better for coding?

Public SWE-Bench figures are not available for Grok 4, so the honest test is your own repository — run an identical real bug through both. By design, Claude Sonnet 4.5 leans toward agentic coding — 77.2% on swe-bench verified, the best score any model had posted at its launch while Grok 4 leans toward 256k context with native tool use, and that positioning usually predicts which feels better on your codebase.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Grok 4?

They are priced almost identically, so cost will not decide between them.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4 — 256K vs 200K, about 1.3× larger. Useful only if the model actually reasons over the full window, which not all do.

Can I use both Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Grok 4 together?

Yes — a multi-model platform like LumiChats gives you Claude Sonnet 4.5, Grok 4 and 40+ others under one ₹69/day pass (about $1/day), so you can draft with one and cross-check with the other instead of buying two subscriptions.

Which is newer, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Grok 4?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 — released September 29, 2025, about 3 months after Grok 4.

Related comparisons

Specifications and benchmarks reflect publicly reported figures as of June 2026 and may change as providers release updates. Always verify on your own workload.